Cited by 77Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Neurodegeneration in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neurone disease associated with expansions in C9orf72 is linked to TDP‐43 pathology and not associated with aggregated forms of dipeptide repeat proteins

Open access
Davidson, Y., Robinson, A. C., Liu, X., Wu, D., Troakes, C., Rollinson, S., Masuda‐Suzukake, M., Suzuki, G. +11 more·2016·Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

Abstract

Aims: A hexanucleotide expansion in C9orf72 is the major genetic cause of inherited behavioural variant Frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and motor neurone disease (MND), although the pathological mechanism(s) underlying disease remains uncertain. Methods: Using antibodies to poly‐GA, poly‐GP, poly‐GR, poly‐AP and poly‐PR proteins, we examined sections of cerebral cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, cerebellum and spinal cord, from 20 patients with bvFTD and/or MND bearing an expansion in C9orf72 for aggregated deposits of dipeptide repeat proteins (DPR). Results: Antibodies to poly‐GA, poly‐GP and poly‐GR detected numerous rounded cytoplasmic inclusions (NCI) within granule cells of hippocampal dentate gyrus and those of the cerebellum, as well as ‘star‐burst’ shaped NCI in pyramidal neurones of CA3/4 region of hippocampus. NCI were uncommon in Purkinje cells, and only very rarely seen in anterior horn cells. Poly‐PA antibody detected occasional NCI within CA3/4 neurones alone, whereas poly‐PR antibody did not identify any NCI but immunostained the nucleus of anterior horn cells, CA3/4 neurones and Purkinje cells, in patients with or without expansion in C9orf72, as well as in normal controls. Poly‐GA antibody generally detected more DPR than poly‐GP, which in turn was greater than poly‐GR. All patients with bvFTD + MND or MND showed plentiful p62/TDP‐43 positive inclusions in remaining anterior horn cells. Conclusion: Degeneration and loss of anterior horn cells associated with expansions in C9orf72 occurs in the absence of DPR, and implies that changes involving loss of nuclear staining for and a cytoplasmic aggregation of TDP‐43 are more likely to be the cause of this.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nan.12292

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DPR inclusions rarely co-label with TARDBP pathological inclusions and are mainly found in areas of the CNS that are not pathologically affected, arguing against a direct role for DPRs in neurodegeneration.

    “On the other hand, DPR inclusions rarely co-label with TARDBP pathological inclusions and are mainly found in areas of the CNS that are not pathologically affected [171,174–177], arguing against a direct role for DPRs in neurodegeneration.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, Y., Robinson, A. C., Liu, X., Wu, D., Troakes, C., Rollinson, S., Masuda‐Suzukake, M., Suzuki, G., Nonaka, T., Shi, J., Tian, J., Hamdalla, H., Ealing, J., Richardson, A., Jones, M., Pickering‐Brown, S., Snowden, J. S., Hasegawa, M., & Mann, D. M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (JP)
  • Salford Royal Hospital (GB)
  • Clinical and Cognitive Sciences Research Group Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences University of Manchester Manchester UK
Corresponding author
Mann, D. M. A.
Venue
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-07
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
242-254
ISSN
  • 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2990
OpenAlex
W1893585873
Cited by
77
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer’s Research UK
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • Medical Research Council
  • Wellcome Trust (089701/Z/09/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
C9orf72 repeat expansion, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, motor neuron disease, dipeptide repeat proteins, TDP-43, anterior horn motor neurons, dentate gyrus, Purkinje cells, disease mechanisms
MeSH terms
C9orf72 Protein, Aged, Inclusion Bodies, Dipeptides, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Degeneration, Neurons, Proteins, Motor Neuron Disease, DNA Repeat Expansion, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review