Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 533

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining intraspecific diversity in plant secondary metabolites in an ecological context

Open access
Moore, Ben D., Andrew, Rose L., Külheim, Carsten, Foley, William J.·2014·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Plant secondary metabolites (PSM s) are ubiquitous in plants and play many ecological roles. Each compound can vary in presence and/or quantity, and the composition of the mixture of chemicals can vary, such that chemodiversity can be partitioned within and among individuals. Plant ontogeny and environmental and genetic variation are recognized as sources of chemical variation, but recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of variation may allow the future deployment of isogenic mutants to test the specific adaptive function of variation in PSM s. An important consequence of high intraspecific variation is the capacity to evolve rapidly. It is becoming increasingly clear that trait variance linked to both macro‐ and micro‐environmental variation can also evolve and may respond more strongly to selection than mean trait values. This research, which is in its infancy in plants, highlights what could be a missing piece of the picture of PSM evolution. PSM polymorphisms are probably maintained by multiple selective forces acting across many spatial and temporal scales, but convincing examples that recognize the diversity of plant population structures are rare. We describe how diversity can be inherently beneficial for plants and suggest fruitful avenues for future research to untangle the causes and consequences of intraspecific variation. Contents Summary 733 I. Introduction 733 II. PSM variation in time: ontogeny, phenology and induced defences 734 III. PSM variation through space: the role of environment 735 IV. Genes and biosynthetic pathways underlying PSM variation 735 V. Mechanisms for diversification of PSMs 735 VI. Examples of diversity from specific biosynthetic pathways 737 VII. How and why is chemical diversity maintained? 739 VIII. Evolvability of PSM variation 740 IX. Evolutionary strategies and diversity in plant chemical defence 742 X. Conclusions and future directions 744 Acknowledgements 745 References 745

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.12526

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Moore, B. D., Andrew, R. L., Külheim, C., & Foley, W. J.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10
Volume
201
Issue
3
Pages
733-750
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2172124708
Cited by
533
References
7
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.