Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model–data synthesis for the next generation of forest free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments

Open access
Norby, Richard J., De Kauwe, Martin G., Domingues, Tomas F., Duursma, Remko A., Ellsworth, David S., Goll, Daniel S., Lapola, David M., Luus, Kristina A., MacKenzie, A. Rob, Medlyn, Belinda E., Pavlick, Ryan, Rammig, Anja, Smith, Benjamin, Thomas, Rick, Thonicke, Kirsten, Walker, Anthony P., Yang, Xiaojuan, Zaehle, Sönke·2016·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: The first generation of forest free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments has successfully provided deeper understanding about how forests respond to an increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. Located in aggrading stands in the temperate zone, they have provided a strong foundation for testing critical assumptions in terrestrial biosphere models that are being used to project future interactions between forest productivity and the atmosphere, despite the limited inference space of these experiments with regards to the range of global ecosystems. Now, a new generation of FACE experiments in mature forests in different biomes and over a wide range of climate space and biodiversity will significantly expand the inference space. These new experiments are: Euc FACE in a mature Eucalyptus stand on highly weathered soil in subtropical Australia; Amazon FACE in a highly diverse, primary rainforest in Brazil; BIF oR‐FACE in a 150‐yr‐old deciduous woodland stand in central England; and Swed FACE proposed in a hemiboreal, Pinus sylvestris stand in Sweden. We now have a unique opportunity to initiate a model–data interaction as an integral part of experimental design and to address a set of cross‐site science questions on topics including responses of mature forests; interactions with temperature, water stress, and phosphorus limitation; and the influence of biodiversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13593

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Norby, R. J., De Kauwe, M. G., Domingues, T. F., Duursma, R. A., Ellsworth, D. S., Goll, D. S., Lapola, D. M., Luus, K. A., MacKenzie, A. R., Medlyn, B. E., Pavlick, R., Rammig, A., Smith, B., Thomas, R., Thonicke, K., Walker, A. P., Yang, X., & Zaehle, S.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-06
Volume
209
Issue
1
Pages
17-28
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2125267982
Cited by
252
References
5
FWCI
26.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model–data synthesis for the next generation of forest free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13593
The paper
Norby, R. J., De Kauwe, M. G., Domingues, T. F., Duursma, R. A., Ellsworth, D. S., Goll, D. S., Lapola, D. M., Luus, K. A., MacKenzie, A. R., Medlyn, B. E., Pavlick, R., Rammig, A., Smith, B., Thomas, R., Thonicke, K., Walker, A. P., Yang, X., & Zaehle, S. (2016). Model–data synthesis for the next generation of forest free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13593

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.