Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationships between soil and leaf mineral composition are element‐specific, environment‐dependent and geographically structured in the emerging model Arabidopsis halleri

Open access
Stein, Ricardo J., Höreth, Stephan, de Melo, J. Romário F., Syllwasschy, Lara, Lee, Gwonjin, Garbin, Mário L., Clemens, Stephan, Krämer, Ute·2017·New Phytologist
DOI 10.1111/nph.14219
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: Leaf mineral composition, the leaf ionome, reflects the complex interaction between a plant and its environment including local soil composition, an influential factor that can limit species distribution and plant productivity. Here we addressed within‐species variation in plant–soil interactions and edaphic adaptation using Arabidopsis halleri, a well‐suited model species as a facultative metallophyte and metal hyperaccumulator. We conducted multi‐element analysis of 1972 paired leaf and soil samples from 165 European populations of A. halleri, at individual resolution to accommodate soil heterogeneity. Results were further confirmed under standardized conditions upon cultivation of 105 field‐collected genotypes on an artificially metal‐contaminated soil in growth chamber experiments. Soil‐independent between‐ and within‐population variation set apart leaf accumulation of zinc, cadmium and lead from all other nutrient and nonessential elements, concurring with differential hypothesized ecological roles in either biotic interaction or nutrition. For these metals, soil–leaf relationships were element‐specific, differed between metalliferous and nonmetalliferous soils and were geographically structured both in the field and under standardized growth conditions, implicating complex scenarios of recent ecological adaptation. Our study provides an example and a reference for future related work and will serve as a basis for the molecular–genetic dissection and ecological analysis of the observed phenotypic variation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.14219

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Alloway BJ, 2008, Zinc in soils and crop nutrition
  2. 10.1126/science.268.5219.1894 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1534/g3.116.026914 · DOI
  4. Baker AJM, 1989, Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements – a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry, Biorecovery, 1, 81
  5. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.1219992 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035121 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0804175105 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bernhardt A, 2015, World's worst pollution problems – the new top six toxic threats: a priority list for remediation
  10. 10.1007/s11104-007-9240-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Boyd RS, 1992, The vegetation of ultramafic (Serpentine) soils, 279
  12. 10.1021/es990279n · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01996.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Brooks RR, 1987, Serpentine and its vegetation – a multi‐disciplinary approach
  15. 10.1073/pnas.1117851109 · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002923 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1073/pnas.1218042110 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03977.x · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s11104-012-1287-3 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/s00049-016-0209-x · DOI
  22. Ernst WHO, 1974, Schwermetallvegetationen der Erde
  23. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002887 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001093 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/1574-6976.12004 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02285.x · DOI
  28. Hendershot WH, 2007, Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 175
  29. 10.1111/eea.12333 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/nph.12663 · DOI
  31. 10.1073/pnas.0701338104 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02699.x · DOI
  33. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112156 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.7554/eLife.06100 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/2419082 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030730 · DOI
  37. Marschner H, 1995, Mineral nutrition of higher plants
  38. 10.1128/AEM.03359-14 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/3391949 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02739.x · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04003.x · DOI
  42. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1007/s10534-015-9829-9 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002814 · DOI
  46. R Core Team, 2013, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  47. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092942 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1126/science.1193954 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1038/nbt1382 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Tan ZX, 2005, Global soil nutrient depletion and yield reduction, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 26, 123
  52. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02748.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1890/08-0127.1 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02078.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/nbt907 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Stein, R. J., Höreth, S., de Melo, J. R. F., Syllwasschy, L., Lee, G., Garbin, M. L., Clemens, S., & Krämer, U.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-13
Volume
213
Issue
3
Pages
1274-1286
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
DOI
10.1111/nph.14219
OpenAlex
W2530246678
Cited by
186
References
11
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1529, Kr1967/10‐1,‐2, Cl152/9‐1,‐2, Kr1967/10-1,-2, Cl152/9-1,-2)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.