Cited by 144

The artificial pancreas: current status and future prospects in the management of diabetes

Peyser, Thomas, Dassau, Eyal, Breton, Marc, Skyler, Jay S.·2014·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent advances in insulins, insulin pumps, continuous glucose‐monitoring systems, and control algorithms have resulted in an acceleration of progress in the development of artificial pancreas devices. This review discusses progress in the development of external systems that are based on subcutaneous drug delivery and subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring. There are two major system‐level approaches to achieving closed‐loop control of blood glucose in diabetic individuals. The unihormonal approach uses insulin to reduce blood glucose and relies on complex safety mitigation algorithms to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. The bihormonal approach uses both insulin to lower blood glucose and glucagon to raise blood glucose, and also relies on complex algorithms to provide for safety of the user. There are several major strategies for the design of control algorithms and supervision control for application to the artificial pancreas: proportional–integral–derivative, model predictive control, fuzzy logic, and safety supervision designs. Advances in artificial pancreas research in the first decade of this century were based on the ongoing computer revolution and miniaturization of electronic technology. The advent of modern smartphones has created the ability to utilize smartphone technology as the engineering centerpiece of an artificial pancreas. With these advances, an artificial or bionic pancreas is within reach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.12431

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advanced device technology, including continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pumps, improves care for patients living with type 1 diabetes and has recently moved to closed-loop artificial pancreas (AP) systems.

    “Advanced device technology, including continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pumps, improves care for patients living with type 1 diabetes and has recently moved to closed-loop artificial pancreas (AP) systems.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peyser, T., Dassau, E., Breton, M., & Skyler, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Dexcom, Inc San Diego California
  • Department of Chemical Engineering and the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara California
  • Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia
  • Diabetes Research Institute University of Miami Miami Florida
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04
Volume
1311
Issue
1
Pages
102-123
ISSN
  • 0077-8923
  • 1749-6632
Cited by
144
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review