Cited by 113Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Revisiting the genomic hypomethylation hypothesis of aging

Open access
Unnikrishnan, Archana, Hadad, Niran, Masser, Dustin R., Jackson, Jordan, Freeman, Willard M., Richardson, Arlan·2018·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The genomic hypomethylation hypothesis of aging proposes that an overall decrease in global DNA methylation occurs with age, and it has been argued that the decrease in global DNA methylation could be an important factor in aging, resulting in the relaxation of gene expression regulation and abnormal gene expression. Since it was initially observed that DNA methylation decreased with age in 1974, 16 articles have been published describing the effect of age on global DNA methylation in various tissues from rodents and humans. We critically reviewed the publications on the effect of age on DNA methylation and the expression of the enzymes involved in DNA methylation to evaluate the validity of the hypomethylation hypothesis of aging. On the basis of the current scientific literature, we conclude that a decrease in the global methylation of the genome occurs in most if not all tissues/cells as an animal ages. However, age‐related changes in DNA methylation in specific regions or at specific sites in the genome occur even though the global DNA methylation does not change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.13533

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unnikrishnan, A., Hadad, N., Masser, D. R., Jackson, J., Freeman, W. M., & Richardson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Oklahoma City VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Arlan
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-24
Volume
1418
Issue
1
Pages
69-79
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2791213438
Cited by
113
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology (HR14‐174)
  • National Institutes of Health (AG045693)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
DNA methylation, aging, global DNA methylation, DNA methylation enzymes, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Enzymes, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, DNA Methylation, Genomics, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review