The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP THEORY: A REASSESSMENT AFTER 10 YEARS
Abstract
A variety of assessments through 2001 discussed the striking neglect of theory related to leadership in public sector organizational settings. For example, Jerry Gabris, Bob Golembiewski, and Doug Ihrke called on the field to ‘improve on the emaciated condition of public leadership theory’. My assessment of administrative leadership soon thereafter, while trying to emphasize a recent uptick in volume, was nonetheless that ‘the needs are great and the research opportunities are manifold’. My relatively negative assessment has been widely cited and needs to be re‐evaluated a decade later since much progress has been made and the research needs have evolved substantially.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations
Longshore, J. M., & Bass, B. M. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258081 · Cited by 12,412
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS
HOOD, C. (1991) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x · Cited by 10,159
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
YUKL, G. A. (1981) · Cited by 5,266
Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector
Weiss, J. A., Osborne, D., Gaebler, T., & Review, N. P. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258896 · Cited by 4,540
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Ethical leadership: A review and future directions
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004 · Cited by 4,029
Pundt, A. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089.50.3.167 · Cited by 3,745
Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 · Cited by 3,550
Cited by
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/ed8235c8-en · Cited by 499
Public value creation through collaborative innovation
Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165 · Cited by 455
BOIN, A., & LODGE, M. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12264 · Cited by 390
Ospina, S. M. (2017) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12706 · Cited by 319
Servant leadership, trust, and the organizational commitment of public sector employees in China
MIAO, Q., NEWMAN, A., SCHWARZ, G., & XU, L. (2014) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12091 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- VAN WART, M.
- Venue
- Public Administration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-28
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 521-543
- ISSN
- 0033-3298 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9299
- OpenAlex
- W1498407994
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 50.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP THEORY: A REASSESSMENT AFTER 10 YEARS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/padm.12017
- The paper
- VAN WART, M. (2013). ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP THEORY: A REASSESSMENT AFTER 10 YEARS. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
