Cited by 8Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy for borderline personality disorder: Utilizing a withdrawal experimental design to improve sensitivity to abandonment

Open access
Kellett, Stephen, Gausden, Joe, Gaskell, Chris·2021·Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

Abstract

Objectives: A primary methodological weakness of the single‐case experimental design (SCED) outcome studies conducted of the treatment of personality disorder with cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) is that they have failed to employ a withdrawal phase or cross‐over design and so are deemed quasi‐experimental. This study sought to implement a withdrawal design, in order to improve the internal validity of the study to make it a true SCED, and also in order to enable the patient to explore abandonment dynamics. Design: The study employed an A 1 /B 1 /A 2 /B 2 with extended follow‐up SCED with a female patient treated with CAT meeting diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Following the 6‐week baseline period ‘A 1 ’, treatment occurred in two phases (21 sessions ‘B 1 ’ and 24 sessions ‘B 2 ’) sandwiching a 12‐week treatment withdrawal phase (‘A 2 ’) and a 24‐week structured follow‐up phase. Seven idiographic daily measures were collected that created a N = 698 day timeline. Nomothetic outcome measures were collected at baseline and at the end of each phase of the study, and the Session Impact Scale was completed after each treatment session. Results: There was a significant increase in the task focus of treatment sessions. Ideographically, CAT was an effective treatment for improving the participant’s self‐to‐self relationship, as their self‐hate reduced and their sense‐of‐self increased. There was a broad pattern of deterioration during the second treatment phase (B 2 ) and follow‐up phase across the ideographic measures, and CAT was ineffective for BPD ideographic emotional or self‐to‐other measures. Reliable change occurred on the primary BPD nomothetic outcome measure from baseline to end of first treatment phase. Conclusions: The study suggests that the CAT intervention was partially successful and that it is possible to integrate good research practice with clinical innovation. The methodological strengths and limitations of the design and the clinical implications of the results are discussed. Practitioner points: Cognitive analytic therapy was partially effective in the treatment of BPD in a case that had been unresponsive to other psychological interventions. Therapists need to complete lengthy and structured follow‐up to capture any emerging relapse. Therapists need to discuss the patient’s thoughts and feelings about termination regularly in a relationally informed manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papt.12278

Cites

73 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring and procedure manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
  2. Ryle, A., Beard, H., & Marlowe, M. J. (1995). Cognitive analytic therapy of borderline personality disorder: Theory, practice and the clinical and research uses of the self-states sequential diagram. International Journal of Short-Term Psychotherapy, 10,21-34.
  3. Wirth-Cauchon, J. (2001). Women and borderline personality disorder. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kellett, S., Gausden, J., & Gaskell, C.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Kellett, Stephen
Venue
Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-12
Volume
94
Issue
S1
Pages
96-119
ISSN
  • 1476-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8341
OpenAlex
W3026011603
Cited by
8
References
78
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
cognitive analytic therapy, borderline personality disorder, single-case experimental design, internal validity, self-hatred, selfhood, relapse, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Borderline Personality Disorder, Cognition, Female, Humans, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review