Cited by 35Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes and associated disorders

Stabilization of glycemic control and improved quality of life using a shared medical appointment model in adolescents with type 1 diabetes in suboptimal control: Shared appointments in T1D youth

Open access
Floyd, Baraka D, Block, Jennifer M, Buckingham, Bruce B, Ly, Trang, Foster, Nicole, Wright, Robert, Mueller, Claudia L, Hood, Korey K +1 more·2017·Pediatric Diabetes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Declining glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D) during adolescence persists despite treatment advances. Non-adherence, peer relations, diabetes burnout, risk taking, transition to autonomy, family conflict, and poor quality of life (QOL) are recognized barriers. Shared medical appointments (SMAs) in adolescent T1D may offer benefits, but data are limited. Our objective was to determine whether SMAs, with multi-component interventions utilizing multidisciplinary teams, improve glycemic control and psychosocial outcomes in poorly controlled adolescent T1D. METHODS: SMAs focused on self-management, communication skills, goal setting, glucose pattern recognition, and peer/diabetes team support. SMAs included: individual history and physical, labs, surveys, multidisciplinary educational ice breakers, group session, and individual wrap up. Outcomes were QOL, adherence, and retrospective and prospective glycemic control. Three to six subjects and families came to 3 SMAs and 1 individual appointment every 3 months over 9 months. SUBJECTS: A total of 37 English speaking subjects, ages 12-16 yrs, with T1D ≥ 1 year, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.5-11% enrolled. Thirty-two subjects attended 75% of visits, meeting inclusion criteria. RESULTS: HbA1c worsened in the 9 months before study (ΔHbA1c= 0.7 ± 1.2; p < 0.01), but remained stable during study (ΔHbA1c = 0.01 ± 1.2; p > 0.05). There were significant improvements in overall QOL (p = 0.005), school function (p = 0.006), psychosocial function (p = 0.008), barriers (p = 0.02), adherence (p = 0.01), and communication (p = 0.02). Improvements in school function and communication reached clinical significance. CONCLUSION: SMAs are feasible replacements to individual appointments in adolescent T1D, stabilizing glycemic control and improving QOL. Randomized controlled trials with optimizations are needed to further explore and refine this intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pedi.12373

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In-school nutrition and lifestyle programs may work better when family and community are involved.

    “Such interventions may be more effective when combined with family and community involvement.1525,1532,1533”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1525]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says multicomponent diabetes interventions addressing family relationships and social support achieved greater improvements in glycemic control. The Study design describes families participating in shared medical appointments, but the paper does not assess in-school nutrition or lifestyle programs or the added effect of community involvement. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In-school nutrition and lifestyle education programs have produced inconsistent results.

    “results from in-school nutrition and lifestyle education programs have been inconsistent.1525–1531”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1525]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes differing outcomes across shared medical appointment studies, and the Abstract (page unavailable) discusses diabetes education for adolescents. Neither addresses results from in-school nutrition and lifestyle education programs. Searches for that phrase and for school-based nutrition and lifestyle interventions found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]13. Riley SB, Marshall ES. Group visits in diabetes care: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ 2010: 36: 9.
  2. [16]16. Block, JM. Shared Medical Appointments in Adolescents in Type 1 Diabetes. Thesis. San Francisco State, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floyd, B. D., Block, J. M., Buckingham, B. B., Ly, T., Foster, N., Wright, R., Mueller, C. L., Hood, K. K., & Shah, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism; Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford CA USA
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Department of Pediatric Surgery; Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford CA USA
Corresponding author
Shah, Avni C
Venue
Pediatric Diabetes
Published
2016-02-26
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
204-212
ISSN
1399-543X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2274498057
Cited by
35
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health
  • Stanford NIH-NCATS-CTSA (UL1 TR001085)
  • Child Health Research Institute of Stanford University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, adolescents, shared medical appointments, glycemic control, HbA1c, quality of life, medication adherence, self-management, multidisciplinary care, psychosocial outcomes, school function, communication skills, peer support
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Adolescent, California, Combined Modality Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diet, Diabetic, Drug Resistance, Feasibility Studies, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Patient Care Team, Patient Education as Topic, Peer Group, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review