Cited by 371Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Worldwide childhood type 1 diabetes incidence–what can we learn from epidemiology?

Open access
Soltesz, G, Patterson, CC, Dahlquist, G, EURODIAB Study Group·2007·Pediatric Diabetes

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes in most part of the world, although reliable data are still unavailable in several countries. Wide variations exist between the incidence rates of different populations, incidence is lowest in China and Venezuela (0.1 per 100,000 per year) and highest in Finland and Sardinia (37 per 100,000 per year). In most populations girls and boys are equally affected. In general, the incidence increases with age, the incidence peak is at puberty. After the pubertal years, the incidence rate significantly drops in young women, but remains relatively high in young adult males up to the age 29-35 years. Prospective national and large international registries (DIAMOND and EURODIAB) demonstrated an increasing trend in incidence in most regions of the world over the last few decades and increases seem to be the highest in the youngest age group. Analytical epidemiological studies have identified environmental risk factors operating early in life which might have contributed to the increasing trend in incidence. These include enteroviral infections in pregnant women, older maternal age (39-42 years), preeclampsia, cesarean section delivery, increased birthweight, early introduction of cow's milk proteins and an increased rate of postnatal growth (weight and height). Optimal vitamin D supplementation during early life has been shown to be protective. Some of these environmental risk factors such as viruses may initiate autoimmunity toward the beta cell, other exposures may put on overload on the already affected beta cell and thus accelerate the disease process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00280.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic changes or more children being born from mothers with type 1 diabetes cannot solely explain the rapid rates of increased incidence of type 1 diabetes.

    “Genetic changes or more children being born from mothers with type 1 diabetes cannot solely explain such rapid rates of increased incidence.22”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [22]

    The 'Temporal trends in incidence' section reports rising childhood type 1 diabetes incidence, and 'Childhood type 1 diabetes' offers environmental and lifestyle factors as potential explanations. This supports the broader point that genetics alone need not explain the increase, but the paper does not address whether an increase in births to mothers with type 1 diabetes could explain it. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • On average, girls and boys are equally affected by type 1 diabetes in young populations.

    “on average girls and boys are equally affected with T1D in young populations28.”

    From Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Soltesz G, 2006, Diabetes Atlas, 153
  2. 10.1007/s001250051573 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Singh R, 2006, Diabetes Atlas, 193

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Soltesz, G., Patterson, C., Dahlquist, G., & EURODIAB Study Group
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • University of Pecs (HU)
Venue
Pediatric Diabetes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10
Volume
8
Issue
s6
Pages
6-14
ISSN
  • 1399-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5448
OpenAlex
W1975485945
Cited by
371
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 35
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, pediatric diabetes, incidence trends, sex differences in incidence, age of onset, environmental risk factors, maternal age, preeclampsia, cesarean section, birth weight, cow's milk introduction, postnatal growth, vitamin D supplementation, islet autoimmunity
MeSH terms
Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Geography, Humans, Seasons, Sex Characteristics, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Epidemiologic Studies, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review