The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Win–Win–Win: The Influence of Company‐Sponsored Volunteerism Programs on Employees, NGOs, and Business Units
Abstract
Although the number of firms adopting corporate volunteerism programs is rising steadily, very few firms are assessing the benefits of such programs on target groups, such as employees and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and identifying the conditions under which benefits to the various groups are maximized. This study addresses both by examining the conditions of employees’ corporate volunteer assignments that lead to increased employee engagement, sustainability of the volunteers’ project within the NGO, capability development for the business unit, and employees’ continuation of volunteerism. Using a longitudinal and multisource design, responses from 116 corporate volunteers from a global pharmaceutical organization are matched with responses from their NGO managers and their business unit managers at 3 points in time: at the start of the volunteer assignment, at the end of the assignment, and 6 months after the completion of the assignment. Across these outcomes, we found that employees’ volunteer assignments are most valuable when they are international, when the volunteers perceive that their projects contribute meaningfully the NGO's functioning, when volunteers have professional skills (and are able to use them), when there are opportunities for skills to be developed that can be applied in the volunteers’ regular work role, and when the NGOs have tangible resources to sustain the volunteers’ projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 1×
“In the organizational context, employees are often the creators and transmitters of knowledge in the work group, team, business unit, and organization (see, for example, Cross & Sproull, 2004; Nonaka, 1994; Nonaka & Konno, 1998; Smith, Collins, & Clark, 2005).”
BackgroundPsychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK.
Kahn, W. A. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256287 · Cited by 10,975
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268 · Cited by 4,623
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317904322915892 · Cited by 3,483
Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x · Cited by 3,154
CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL ATTRACTIVENESS TO PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES.
TURBAN, D. B., & GREENING, D. W. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257057 · Cited by 3,149
Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach.
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516 · Cited by 2,994
Cited by
Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0849 · Cited by 649
Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration
Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.004 · Cited by 560
Stahl, G. K., Brewster, C. J., Collings, D. G., & Hajro, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100708 · Cited by 502
The drivers of work engagement: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal evidence
Lesener, T., Gusy, B., Jochmann, A., & Wolter, C. (2020) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2019.1686440 · Cited by 213
Microfoundations of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility
Shea, C. T., & Hawn, O. V. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0795 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Caligiuri, P., Mencin, A., & Jiang, K.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-14
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 825-860
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2094647603
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 25.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Win–Win–Win: The Influence of Company‐Sponsored Volunteerism Programs on Employees, NGOs, and Business Units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/peps.12019
- The paper
- Caligiuri, P., Mencin, A., & Jiang, K. (2013). Win–Win–Win: The Influence of Company‐Sponsored Volunteerism Programs on Employees, NGOs, and Business Units. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
