Cited by 26Skin Protection and Agingmelanin and skin pigmentationOcular and Laser Science Research

A broad spectrum high‐SPF photostable sunscreen with a high UVA‐PF can protect against cellular damage at high UV exposure doses

Cole, Curtis, Appa, Yohini, Ou‐Yang, Hao·2014·Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine

Abstract

Summary: Background: Advances in sunscreen technologies have yielded broad spectrum sunscreens at high‐sun protection factor (SPF) and ultraviolet A protection factor (UVA‐PF) levels that are photostable and powerful in protecting skin from erythema. Questions arise whether these sunscreens protect proportionally against cellular skin damage caused by high ultraviolet exposures. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate if high‐SPF sunscreen can protect skin at a cellular level under UV exposure doses [> 50 minimal erythema dose (MED)] similarly to the SPF value. Methods: Sunburn cells, Langerhans cells, thymine dimers, protein 53 (p53), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐1 and MMP‐9 endpoints were evaluated in biopsies from 12 subjects following four treatments: unprotected exposed to 0, 1 and 3 MED and sunscreen (SPF 55) protected exposed to 55 MED of UV radiation. Results: All the markers showed significantly more damage for the 3 MED‐untreated sites when compared with non‐irradiated control, and majority of the markers showed marked damage following unprotected 1 MED exposure. After 55 MEDs, sunscreen‐protected sites showed significantly less p53 and MMP‐9 (keratinocyte) staining than the 1 MED‐exposed unprotected sites, while all the other biomarkers in sunscreen protected sites showed no statistical differences from 1 MED‐exposed unprotected sites. Conclusions: A high‐SPF photostable sunscreen with high UVA‐PF can provide proportionately high protection against multiple cellular damage markers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phpp.12124

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cole, C., Appa, Y., & Ou‐Yang, H.
Affiliations
  • Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
  • Neutrogena (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ou‐Yang, Hao
Venue
Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
212-219
ISSN
  • 0905-4383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0781
OpenAlex
W1751486115
Cited by
26
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
Keywords
sunscreen, photostability, broad-spectrum UV protection, UVA protection factor, sunburn cells, Langerhans cells, thymine dimers, p53, MMP-1, MMP-9, keratinocytes, minimal erythema dose
MeSH terms
Adult, Erythema, Female, Humans, Langerhans Cells, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrimidine Dimers, Skin, Sunscreening Agents, Ultraviolet Rays, Biomarkers, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, Matrix Metalloproteinase 1, Sun Protection Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review