Cited by 740Skin Protection and AgingProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsTGF-β signaling in diseases

Matrix-Degrading Metalloproteinases in Photoaging

Open access
Quan, Taihao, Qin, Zhaoping, Xia, Wei, Shao, Yuan, Voorhees, John J., Fisher, Gary J.·2009·Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings

Abstract

UV radiation from the sun impacts skin health adversely through complex, multiple molecular pathways. Premature skin aging (photoaging) is among the most widely appreciated harmful effects of chronic exposure to solar UV radiation. Extensive damage to the dermal connective tissue is a hallmark of photoaged skin. Disruption of the normal architecture of skin connective tissue impairs skin function and causes it to look aged. UV irradiation induces expression of certain members of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family, which degrade collagen and other extracellular matrix proteins that comprise the dermal connective tissue. Although the critical role of MMPs in photoaging is undeniable, important questions remain. This article summarizes our current understanding of the role of MMPs in the photoaging process and presents new data that (1) describe the expression and regulation by UV irradiation of all members of the MMP family in human skin in vivo and (2) quantify the relative contributions of epidermis and dermis to the expression of UV irradiation-induced MMPs in human skin in vivo.Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings (2009) 14, 20-24; doi:10.1038/jidsymp.2009.8.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jidsymp.2009.8

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different MMPs generally have distinct effects and may participate in both inflammation initiation and resolution.

    “Different MMPs generally have distinct effects and may participate in both inflammation initiation and resolution ( 37 )”

    From Photorepair of Either CPD or 6-4PP DNA Lesions in Basal Keratinocytes Attenuates Ultraviolet-Induced Skin Effects in Nucleotide Excision Repair Deficient Mice (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

    The section on MMP gene expression in human skin distinguishes MMPs by substrate specificity and describes different roles for MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9 in collagen degradation. It lists inflammation among processes involving MMPs, but does not say they initiate or resolve inflammation. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MMPs are a group of enzymes activated by UV radiation that contribute significantly to the degradation of collagen and other structural proteins in the dermis, leading to visible signs of photoaging such as wrinkles, laxity, and uneven texture.

    “MMPs are a group of enzymes activated by UV radiation that contribute significantly to the degradation of collagen and other structural proteins in the dermis, leading to visible signs of photoaging such as wrinkles, laxity, and uneven texture.”

    From A Comprehensive Review of the Role of UV Radiation in Photoaging Processes Between Different Types of Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • UV-induced oxidative stress upregulates MMPs, particularly MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9, which break down type I and III collagen fibers in the skin.

    “UV-induced oxidative stress upregulates MMPs, particularly MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9, which break down type I and III collagen fibers in the skin [68].”

    From A Comprehensive Review of the Role of UV Radiation in Photoaging Processes Between Different Types of Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    The section on MMP gene expression in UV-irradiated human skin (page unavailable) reports that UV induces MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9; MMP-1 cleaves type I and III collagen, which MMP-3 and MMP-9 can further degrade. It describes UV-induced AP-1 activation but does not establish oxidative stress as the mechanism of MMP upregulation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One mechanism responsible for increased protein degradation in photoageing results from activation of proteases such as matrix metalloproteinases.

    “One of the mechanisms responsible for increased protein degradation in photoageing results from the activation of proteases such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [25, 51, 52].”

    From Elastin structure and its involvement in skin photoageing (2017) · cites this paper as [52]

  • Photoprotection strategies, including broad-spectrum sunscreens and antioxidant-enriched skincare, have been shown to mitigate MMP activation and preserve dermal integrity.

    “Photoprotection strategies, including broad-spectrum sunscreens and antioxidant-enriched skincare, have been shown to mitigate MMP activation and preserve dermal integrity.”

    From A Comprehensive Review of the Role of UV Radiation in Photoaging Processes Between Different Types of Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Introduction and the section on MMP gene expression explain that UV exposure induces MMPs that damage dermal collagen. Our copy does not report that broad-spectrum sunscreens or antioxidant-enriched skincare reduce MMP activation or preserve dermal integrity; searches for “sunscreen” and “antioxidant” found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kaminer MS Gilchrest BA Photodamage: magnitude of the problem Photodamage 1995 Cambridge Blackwell Science 1 11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quan, T., Qin, Z., Xia, W., Shao, Y., Voorhees, J. J., & Fisher, G. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Gary J.
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
20-24
ISSN
1087-0024 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024837178
Cited by
740
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 30
FWCI
45.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG025186)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
photoaging, matrix metalloproteinases, ultraviolet radiation, skin aging, dermal connective tissue, collagen degradation, extracellular matrix, epidermis, dermis
MeSH terms
Epidermis, Humans, RNA, Messenger, Skin, Ultraviolet Rays, Skin Aging, Gene Expression, Matrix Metalloproteinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review