Cited by 130Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Identifying Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder at 18 Months in a General Population Sample

Open access
Stenberg, Nina, Bresnahan, Michaeline, Gunnes, Nina, Hirtz, Deborah, Hornig, Mady, Lie, Kari Kveim, Lipkin, W. Ian, Lord, Catherine +9 more·2014·Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Abstract

Background: Previous research on clinical and high‐risk samples suggests that signs of autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) can be detected between 1 and 2 years of age. We investigated signs of ASD at 18 months in a population‐based sample and the association with later ASD diagnosis. Methods: The study sample includes 52 026 children born 2003 through 2008 and is a subset of children that participated in the N orwegian Mother and Child Cohort ( MoBa ), a population‐based longitudinal study, and the Autism Birth Cohort ( ABC ), a sub‐study on ASD . Parents completed all 23 items from the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers ( M‐CHAT ) at 18 months. Results: The M‐CHAT 6‐critical‐item criterion and the 23‐item criterion had a specificity of 97.9% and 92.7% and a sensitivity of 20.8% and 34.1%, respectively. In the 173 children diagnosed with ASD to date, 60 children (34.7%) scored above the cut‐off on either of the screening criteria. The items with the highest likelihood ratios were ‘interest in other children’, ‘show objects to others’ and ‘response to name’. Conclusion: Even though one‐third of the children who later received an ASD diagnosis were identified through M‐CHAT items, the majority scored below cut‐off on the screening criteria at 18 months. The results imply that it might not be possible to detect all children with ASD at this age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ppe.12114

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Screening often identifies children with broader developmental difficulties as well as those with ASD.

    “Screening also often identifies children with broader developmental difficulties as well as those with ASD 149”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [149]

  • These principles also apply in low-income and middle-income countries in which testing for ASD and other neurodevelopmental disabilities has only just begun to be developed.

    “These principles also apply in low-income and middle-income countries in which testing for ASD and other neurodevelopmental disabilities has only just begun to be developed 149”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [149]

    The Strengths and Limitations section discusses screening in Norway and says the authors could not assess the impact of social and cultural factors on their results (page unavailable). Our copy does not address whether the study’s principles apply in low- or middle-income countries or whether testing for ASD and other neurodevelopmental disabilities is only beginning there; searches for those settings and cross-country applicability found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stenberg, N., Bresnahan, M., Gunnes, N., Hirtz, D., Hornig, M., Lie, K. K., Lipkin, W. I., Lord, C., Magnus, P., Reichborn‐Kjennerud, T., Schjølberg, S., Surén, P., Susser, E., Svendsen, B. K., von Tetzchner, S., Øyen, A., & Stoltenberg, C.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus (NO)
  • Institute of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Corresponding author
Stenberg, Nina
Venue
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-18
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
255-262
ISSN
  • 0269-5022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3016
OpenAlex
W1540039746
Cited by
130
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS47537)
  • The Research Council of Norway (196452)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, early detection, toddlers, autism screening, M-CHAT, sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, parent report
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mass Screening, Maternal Age, Norway, Parents, Play and Playthings, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Social Behavior, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review