Cited by 122Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Cohort effects explain the increase in autism diagnosis among children born from 1992 to 2003 in California

Open access
Keyes, Katherine M, Susser, Ezra, Cheslack-Postava, Keely, Fountain, Christine, Liu, Kayuet, Bearman, Peter S·2012·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence and prevalence of autism have dramatically increased over the last 20 years. Decomposition of autism incidence rates into age, period and cohort effects disentangle underlying domains of causal factors linked to time trends. We estimate an age-period-cohort effect model for autism diagnostic incidence overall and by level of functioning. METHODS: Data are drawn from sequential cohorts of all 6 501 262 individuals born in California from 1992 to 2003. Autism diagnoses from 1994 to 2005 were ascertained from the California Department of Development Services Client Development and Evaluation Report. RESULTS: Compared with those born in 1992, each successively younger cohort has significantly higher odds of an autism diagnosis than the previous cohort, controlling for age and period effects. For example, individuals born in 2003 have 16.6 times the odds of an autism diagnosis compared with those born in 1992 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-35.3]. The cohort effect observed in these data is stronger for high than for low-functioning children with an autism diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Autism incidence in California exhibits a robust and linear positive cohort effect that is stronger among high-functioning children with an autism diagnosis. This finding indicates that the primary drivers of the increases in autism diagnoses must be factors that: (i) have increased linearly year-to-year; (ii) aggregate in birth cohorts; and (iii) are stronger among children with higher levels of functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyr193

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gernsbacher MA, Dawson M, Goldsmith HH. Three reasons not to believe the autism epidemic. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2005;14:55-58.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keyes, K. M., Susser, E., Cheslack-Postava, K., Fountain, C., Liu, K., & Bearman, P. S.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Bearman, Peter S
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2011-12-07
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
495-503
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2159197552
Cited by
122
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003635)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041022)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autism incidence, cohort effects, age-period-cohort model, temporal trends, high-functioning autism, low-functioning autism, birth cohort, California
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Autistic Disorder, California, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Risk Factors, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review