Cited by 88Public Policy and Administration ResearchRegulation and Compliance StudiesTaxation and Compliance Studies

Can Transparency Foster More Understanding and Compliant Citizens?

Porumbescu, Gregory A., Lindeman, Meghan I. H., Ceka, Erica, Cucciniello, Maria·2017·Public Administration Review

Abstract

Voluntary policy compliance is an important yet rarely studied topic in public administration. To address the paucity of research, this article proposes and empirically tests a conceptual framework that ties policy transparency and policy understanding to voluntary policy compliance intentions. The reasoning is that the extent to which citizens understand a policy contributes to their intentions to comply with that policy. Further, the authors argue that policy transparency indirectly influences voluntary policy compliance intentions through a positive effect on citizens’ levels of policy understanding. To enhance the validity of the findings, the authors assess these relationships across two policy domains. The findings reflect an indirect positive effect of transparency on voluntary compliance occurring through policy understanding. However, this emerged only for one policy domain. These results suggest that the effects of policy transparency on policy understanding and voluntary policy compliance intentions may depend on the policy domain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/puar.12790

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparency's effects on trust appear contingent on policy domain, prior attitudes, and presentation format.

    “Effects appear to be contingent on policy domain (de Fine Licht, 2014), prior attitudes (Grimmelikhuijsen & Meijer, 2014), and even presentation format (Porumbescu et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porumbescu, G. A., Lindeman, M. I. H., Ceka, E., & Cucciniello, M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
  • Bocconi University (IT)
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-09
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
840-850
ISSN
  • 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6210
OpenAlex
W2729182503
Cited by
88
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Taxation and Compliance Studies
Keywords
policy transparency, policy understanding, compliance intention, citizen compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review