The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prebiotics as functional ingredients: focus on Mediterranean fish aquaculture
Abstract
The increased demand for food fish, together with the banning of antibiotics for fish growth promotion and the greater public awareness for healthy fish production, led to an increased interest in the potential of functional feeds as health promoters. Prebiotics are functional ingredients that are used in fish, being reported to be associated with improvements in growth, feed efficiency, gut microbiota, digestive enzyme activities, gut morphology, immune status, disease resistance, intermediary metabolism, and stress responses. Those benefits may be related with the increase in gut beneficial bacteria, bacteria end‐products of prebiotic fermentation, or the interaction between prebiotics and pattern recognition receptors. Due to the reported prebiotic‐related positive effects in fish, a large amount of studies have been published in the last years, mainly focusing on prebiotics’ benefits to fish. Thus, the present review focuses on prebiotics’ potential as functional ingredients, focusing on their mechanisms of action. In addition, this review summarizes prebiotic effects in Mediterranean aquaculture fish, whose production has greatly increased in the last years. Finally, topics that deserve to be further explored, such as prebiotic effects related with fish age and size, and timing and duration of administration are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antioxidant potential of ferulic acid
Graf, E. (1992) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(92)90184-i · Cited by 1,115
Fish Matters: Importance of Aquatic Foods in Human Nutrition and Global Food Supply
Tacon, A. G. J., & Metian, M. (2013) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/10641262.2012.753405 · Cited by 675
Probiotics and prebiotics associated with aquaculture: A review
Akhter, N., Wu, B., Memon, A. M., & Mohsin, M. (2015) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2015.05.038 · Cited by 548
Acetic Acid Activates Hepatic AMPK and Reduces Hyperglycemia in Diabetic KK-A (y) Mice
Sakakibara, S., Yamauchi, T., Oshima, Y., Tsukamoto, Y., & Kadowaki, T. (2006) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.176 · Cited by 263
Frost, G. S., Brynes, A. E., Dhillo, W. S., Bloom, S. R., & McBurney, M. I. (2003) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601520 · Cited by 142
Cerezuela, R., Meseguer, J., & Esteban, M. Á. (2013) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2012.12.026 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Sustainable aquaculture requires environmental‐friendly treatment strategies for fish diseases
Lieke, T., Meinelt, T., Hoseinifar, S. H., Pan, B., Straus, D. L., & Steinberg, C. E. W. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12365 · Cited by 363
Józefiak, A., Nogales-Mérida, S., Rawski, M., Kierończyk, B., & Mazurkiewicz, J. (2019) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-019-2070-y · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerreiro, I., Oliva‐Teles, A., & Enes, P.
- Venue
- Reviews in Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-06-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 800-832
- ISSN
- 1753-5123 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-5131
- OpenAlex
- W2695763334
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prebiotics as functional ingredients: focus on Mediterranean fish aquaculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/raq.12201
- The paper
- Guerreiro, I., Oliva‐Teles, A., & Enes, P. (2018). Prebiotics as functional ingredients: focus on Mediterranean fish aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.