The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition
Open accessAbstract
International restoration standardsThe Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) is an international non-profit organization with members in 70 countries.SER advances the science, practice and policy of ecological restoration to sustain biodiversity, improve resilience in a changing climate, and re-establish an ecologically healthy relationship between nature and culture.SER is a dynamic global network, linking researchers, practitioners, land managers, community leaders and decision-makers to restore ecosystems and the human communities that depend on them.Via its members, publications, conferences, policy work, and outreach, SER defines and delivers excellence in the field of ecological restoration. Document development. International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration (the Standards)was developed through consultation with professionals within the Society for Ecological Restoration and their peers in the global scientific and conservation communities.The first edition was launched in 2016 at the United Nations Biodiversity Conference in Cancún, Mexico.This event brought together key stakeholders from across the international policy arena, many of whom had been instrumental in driving the global initiatives to implement large-scale environmental restoration programs.Because the Standards were written as a living document to be modified and expanded through consultation and use by stakeholders, the launch included an open invitation for stakeholder input, to both improve the document and promote broad use.Subsequently, over a multi-year consultation period, SER invited input and review from a diverse spectrum of people and organizations contributing to ecological restoration.Key stakeholders contacted for comment included the secretariats of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) including its Science-Policy Interface, Global Environment Facility, the World Bank, and members of the Global Partnership on Forest Landscape Restoration (GPFLR).In 2017, SER partnered with the IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management to deliver an invited Forum on Biodiversity and Global Forest Restoration at which the SER Standards were reviewed (SER and IUCN-CEM 2018).SER also organized a symposium on the SER Standards and an open Knowledge Café at the 2017 SER World Conference on Ecological Restoration.Additional input was received at other events, including the 9 th Ecosystem Services Partnership World Conference in Shenzhen, China in 2017.To capture the perspectives of the SER community, SER invited online feedback via its website and sent an online survey to SER members, affiliates, and stakeholders.SER has also considered and responded to feedback from published critiques in its journal, Restoration Ecology.All comments received during the consultative review process were considered in the revision process.The second edition of the Standards was approved by the SER Science and Policy Committee, and the SER Board of Directors on 18 June 2019.As with the first edition, this version will be revised and improved as the discipline evolves through science, practice, and adaptive management.The Standards are compatible with and expand on the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation (Conservation Measures Partnership 2013) and complement the REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards (REDD+ SES 2012), and other conservation standards and guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recovery and Management Options for Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon in the Columbia River Basin
Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & McClure, M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5493.977 · Cited by 347
Clewell, A. F., & Aronson, J. (2013) · doi:10.5822/978-1-59726-323-8 · Cited by 180
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 88
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9781315685977 · doi:10.4324/9781315685977
- 10.1111/rec.12011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.10.en · DOI
- 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.17.en · DOI
- Besseau P, 2018, Restoring forests and landscapes: the key to a sustainable future
- 10.1111/emr.12000 · doi:10.1111/emr.12000
- 10.2307/2403372 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00045.x · DOI · Paper page
- Cairns J, 1977, Recovery and restoration of damaged ecosystems
- 10.1111/rec.12704 · doi:10.1111/rec.12704
- 10.1007/s00442-003-1311-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.017 · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.017
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Chazdon RL, 2017, Partnering with nature: the case for natural regeneration in forest and landscape restoration
- 10.1111/btp.12381 · DOI · Paper page
- Clewell A, 2005, Guidelines for developing and managing ecological restoration projects
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/15-0075 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10584-007-9373-x · doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9373-x
- Doyle M, 2012, Large‐scale ecosystem restoration: five case studies from the United States
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Egan D, 2001, The historical ecology handbook. A restorationist's guide to reference ecosystems
- 10.3389/fpls.2014.00200 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-019-00772-4 · DOI
- Gann G, 2006, Ecological restoration: a means of conserving biodiversity and sustaining livelihoods
- 10.1111/eva.12379 · DOI
- 10.1111/rec.12408 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecocom.2004.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-009-4822-8_3 · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4822-8_3
- 10.1111/rec.12899 · DOI
- Hanson C, 2015, The restoration diagnostic v. 1.0
- 10.3375/043.035.0116 · DOI
- Hobbs RJ, 2004, Assembly rules and restoration ecology: bridging the gap between theory and practice, 72
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0491:LRMFGT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1365-2664.12814 · DOI
- 10.1111/avsc.12394 · doi:10.1111/avsc.12394
- 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11104-009-0068-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05271.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1365-2664.12275 · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12275
- IUCN and WRI(2014) A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub‐national level. Working Paper (Road‐test edition). IUCN Gland Switzerland
- 10.1111/rec.12060 · doi:10.1111/rec.12060
- Kaye TN, 2001, Native plant propagation and restoration strategies, 5
- Keenleyside KA, 2012, Ecological restoration for protected areas: principles, guidelines and best practices
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/rec.12636 · doi:10.1111/rec.12636
- 10.1038/s41893-019-0229-y · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0229-y
- 10.1111/rec.12462 · DOI
- Liu J, 2017, Management of ecological rehabilitation projects
- 10.5751/ES-01987-120105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ldr.3014 · DOI
- 10.1111/btp.12382 · DOI
- Matthews JA, 1999, Ecosystems of disturbed ground, 17
- 10.3368/er.18.1.10 · DOI
- 10.1111/rec.12359 · DOI · Paper page
- McDonald T, 2016, International standards for the practice of ecological restoration ‐ including principles and key concepts
- McDonaldT JonsonJ DixonKW(2018) National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia. 2nd edition. Standards Reference Group Society for Ecological Restoration Australasiawww.seraustralasia.com(accessed 20 May 2019)
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.006 · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.006
- O'Beirn FX, 2000, Toward design criteria in constructed oyster reefs: oyster recruitment as a function of substrate type and tidal height, Journal of Shellfish Research, 19, 387
- 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5822/978-1-61091-698-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Perry D, 1994, Forest ecosystems, 302
- 10.3354/meps08164 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00412.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/avsc.12064 · DOI
- 10.3389/fevo.2015.00065 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/070057 · DOI · Paper page
- Rogers DL, 2004, Genetically appropriate choices for plant materials to maintain biological diversity
- 10.1111/emr.12214 · DOI
- 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2014.10.052 · doi:10.5154/r.rchscfa.2014.10.052
- 10.1007/s10592-004-7829-3 · doi:10.1007/s10592-004-7829-3
- 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00192-0 · DOI
- Seddon S, 2004, Seagrass rehabilitation in metropolitan Adelaide. II. Preliminary draft donor bed independent methods progress report
- Society for Ecological Restoration, 2004, The SER international primer on ecological restoration
- Suding KN, 2006, Foundations of restoration ecology, 190
- 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1189:AHEUTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Temperton VM, 2004, Ecological filters, thresholds, and gradients in resistance to ecosystem reassembly
- 10.1002/9781118223130 · DOI · Paper page
- Vander Zanden MJ, 2006, Foundations of restoration ecology, 165
- 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02238.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00572 · DOI
- 10.2307/1307321 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss3art2 · DOI
Cited by
The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches
Hua, F., Bruijnzeel, L. A., Meli, P., Martin, P. A., Zhang, J., Nakagawa, S., Miao, X., Wang, W., McEvoy, C., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl4649 · Cited by 831
Self-citationMangrove Rehabilitation and Restoration as Experimental Adaptive Management
Ellison, A. M., Felson, A. J., & Friess, D. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00327 · Cited by 259
Protecting and restoring habitats to benefit freshwater biodiversity
Piczak, M. L., Perry, D., Cooke, S. J., Harrison, I., Benitez, S., Koning, A., Peng, L., Limbu, P., Smokorowski, K. E., Salinas-Rodriguez, S., et al. (2024) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/er-2023-0034 · Cited by 68
Piczak, M. L., Anderton, R., Cartwright, L. A., Little, D., MacPherson, G., Matos, L., McDonald, K., Portiss, R., Riehl, M., Sciscione, T., et al. (2022) · Ecological Solutions and Evidence · doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12187 · Cited by 14
Evaluation on the Restoration Effects in the River Restoration Projects Practiced in South Korea
An, J. H., Lim, B. S., Seol, J., Kim, A. R., Lim, C. H., Moon, J. S., & Lee, C. S. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14172739 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J., Nelson, C. R., Jonson, J., Hallett, J. G., Eisenberg, C., Guariguata, M. R., Liu, J., Hua, F., Echeverría, C., Gonzales, E., Shaw, N., Decleer, K., & Dixon, K. W.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- S1
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W2971398159
- Cited by
- 1,488
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 77.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41625001)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20060402)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/rec.13035
- The paper
- Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J., Nelson, C. R., Jonson, J., Hallett, J. G., Eisenberg, C., Guariguata, M. R., Liu, J., Hua, F., Echeverría, C., Gonzales, E., Shaw, N., Decleer, K., & Dixon, K. W. (2019). International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.