Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,488

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition

Open access
Gann, George D., McDonald, Tein, Walder, Bethanie, Aronson, James, Nelson, Cara R., Jonson, Justin, Hallett, James G., Eisenberg, Cristina, Guariguata, Manuel R., Liu, Junguo, Hua, Fangyuan, Echeverría, Cristian, Gonzales, Emily, Shaw, Nancy, Decleer, Kris, Dixon, Kingsley W.·2019·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

International restoration standardsThe Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) is an international non-profit organization with members in 70 countries.SER advances the science, practice and policy of ecological restoration to sustain biodiversity, improve resilience in a changing climate, and re-establish an ecologically healthy relationship between nature and culture.SER is a dynamic global network, linking researchers, practitioners, land managers, community leaders and decision-makers to restore ecosystems and the human communities that depend on them.Via its members, publications, conferences, policy work, and outreach, SER defines and delivers excellence in the field of ecological restoration. Document development. International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration (the Standards)was developed through consultation with professionals within the Society for Ecological Restoration and their peers in the global scientific and conservation communities.The first edition was launched in 2016 at the United Nations Biodiversity Conference in Cancún, Mexico.This event brought together key stakeholders from across the international policy arena, many of whom had been instrumental in driving the global initiatives to implement large-scale environmental restoration programs.Because the Standards were written as a living document to be modified and expanded through consultation and use by stakeholders, the launch included an open invitation for stakeholder input, to both improve the document and promote broad use.Subsequently, over a multi-year consultation period, SER invited input and review from a diverse spectrum of people and organizations contributing to ecological restoration.Key stakeholders contacted for comment included the secretariats of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) including its Science-Policy Interface, Global Environment Facility, the World Bank, and members of the Global Partnership on Forest Landscape Restoration (GPFLR).In 2017, SER partnered with the IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management to deliver an invited Forum on Biodiversity and Global Forest Restoration at which the SER Standards were reviewed (SER and IUCN-CEM 2018).SER also organized a symposium on the SER Standards and an open Knowledge Café at the 2017 SER World Conference on Ecological Restoration.Additional input was received at other events, including the 9 th Ecosystem Services Partnership World Conference in Shenzhen, China in 2017.To capture the perspectives of the SER community, SER invited online feedback via its website and sent an online survey to SER members, affiliates, and stakeholders.SER has also considered and responded to feedback from published critiques in its journal, Restoration Ecology.All comments received during the consultative review process were considered in the revision process.The second edition of the Standards was approved by the SER Science and Policy Committee, and the SER Board of Directors on 18 June 2019.As with the first edition, this version will be revised and improved as the discipline evolves through science, practice, and adaptive management.The Standards are compatible with and expand on the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation (Conservation Measures Partnership 2013) and complement the REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards (REDD+ SES 2012), and other conservation standards and guidelines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/rec.13035

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.044 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.4324/9781315685977 · doi:10.4324/9781315685977
  3. 10.1111/rec.12011 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.10.en · DOI
  5. 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.17.en · DOI
  6. Besseau P, 2018, Restoring forests and landscapes: the key to a sustainable future
  7. 10.1111/emr.12000 · doi:10.1111/emr.12000
  8. 10.2307/2403372 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00045.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cairns J, 1977, Recovery and restoration of damaged ecosystems
  12. 10.1111/rec.12704 · doi:10.1111/rec.12704
  13. 10.1007/s00442-003-1311-7 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.017 · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.017
  15. 10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Chazdon RL, 2017, Partnering with nature: the case for natural regeneration in forest and landscape restoration
  17. 10.1111/btp.12381 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Clewell A, 2005, Guidelines for developing and managing ecological restoration projects
  19. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1890/15-0075 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s10584-007-9373-x · doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9373-x
  22. Doyle M, 2012, Large‐scale ecosystem restoration: five case studies from the United States
  23. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Egan D, 2001, The historical ecology handbook. A restorationist's guide to reference ecosystems
  25. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00200 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s10980-019-00772-4 · DOI
  27. Gann G, 2006, Ecological restoration: a means of conserving biodiversity and sustaining livelihoods
  28. 10.1111/eva.12379 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/rec.12408 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2004.11.006 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/978-94-009-4822-8_3 · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4822-8_3
  32. 10.1111/rec.12899 · DOI
  33. Hanson C, 2015, The restoration diagnostic v. 1.0
  34. 10.3375/043.035.0116 · DOI
  35. Hobbs RJ, 2004, Assembly rules and restoration ecology: bridging the gap between theory and practice, 72
  36. 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0491:LRMFGT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/1365-2664.12814 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/avsc.12394 · doi:10.1111/avsc.12394
  39. 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/s11104-009-0068-0 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05271.x · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/1365-2664.12275 · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12275
  44. IUCN and WRI(2014) A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub‐national level. Working Paper (Road‐test edition). IUCN Gland Switzerland
  45. 10.1111/rec.12060 · doi:10.1111/rec.12060
  46. Kaye TN, 2001, Native plant propagation and restoration strategies, 5
  47. Keenleyside KA, 2012, Ecological restoration for protected areas: principles, guidelines and best practices
  48. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1111/rec.12636 · doi:10.1111/rec.12636
  50. 10.1038/s41893-019-0229-y · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0229-y
  51. 10.1111/rec.12462 · DOI
  52. Liu J, 2017, Management of ecological rehabilitation projects
  53. 10.5751/ES-01987-120105 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1002/ldr.3014 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/btp.12382 · DOI
  56. Matthews JA, 1999, Ecosystems of disturbed ground, 17
  57. 10.3368/er.18.1.10 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/rec.12359 · DOI · Paper page
  59. McDonald T, 2016, International standards for the practice of ecological restoration ‐ including principles and key concepts
  60. McDonaldT JonsonJ DixonKW(2018) National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia. 2nd edition. Standards Reference Group Society for Ecological Restoration Australasiawww.seraustralasia.com(accessed 20 May 2019)
  61. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.006 · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.006
  62. O'Beirn FX, 2000, Toward design criteria in constructed oyster reefs: oyster recruitment as a function of substrate type and tidal height, Journal of Shellfish Research, 19, 387
  63. 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.5822/978-1-61091-698-1 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Perry D, 1994, Forest ecosystems, 302
  66. 10.3354/meps08164 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00412.x · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1111/avsc.12064 · DOI
  69. 10.3389/fevo.2015.00065 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1890/070057 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Rogers DL, 2004, Genetically appropriate choices for plant materials to maintain biological diversity
  72. 10.1111/emr.12214 · DOI
  73. 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2014.10.052 · doi:10.5154/r.rchscfa.2014.10.052
  74. 10.1007/s10592-004-7829-3 · doi:10.1007/s10592-004-7829-3
  75. 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00192-0 · DOI
  76. Seddon S, 2004, Seagrass rehabilitation in metropolitan Adelaide. II. Preliminary draft donor bed independent methods progress report
  77. Society for Ecological Restoration, 2004, The SER international primer on ecological restoration
  78. Suding KN, 2006, Foundations of restoration ecology, 190
  79. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1189:AHEUTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Temperton VM, 2004, Ecological filters, thresholds, and gradients in resistance to ecosystem reassembly
  81. 10.1002/9781118223130 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Vander Zanden MJ, 2006, Foundations of restoration ecology, 165
  83. 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02238.x · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00572 · DOI
  85. 10.2307/1307321 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.012 · DOI
  87. 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss3art2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,488

Metadata

Authors
Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J., Nelson, C. R., Jonson, J., Hallett, J. G., Eisenberg, C., Guariguata, M. R., Liu, J., Hua, F., Echeverría, C., Gonzales, E., Shaw, N., Decleer, K., & Dixon, K. W.
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09
Volume
27
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W2971398159
Cited by
1,488
References
2
FWCI
77.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41625001)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20060402)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/rec.13035
The paper
Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J., Nelson, C. R., Jonson, J., Hallett, J. G., Eisenberg, C., Guariguata, M. R., Liu, J., Hua, F., Echeverría, C., Gonzales, E., Shaw, N., Decleer, K., & Dixon, K. W. (2019). International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.