Cited by 983Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIRegulation and Compliance Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation

Open access

Yeung, Karen·2018·Regulation & Governance

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Innovations in networked digital communications technologies, including the rise of “Big Data,” ubiquitous computing, and cloud storage systems, may be giving rise to a new system of social ordering known as algorithmic regulation. Algorithmic regulation refers to decisionmaking systems that regulate a domain of activity in order to manage risk or alter behavior through continual computational generation of knowledge by systematically collecting data (in real time on a continuous basis) emitted directly from numerous dynamic components pertaining to the regulated environment in order to identify and, if necessary, automatically refine (or prompt refinement of) the system's operations to attain a pre‐specified goal. This study provides a descriptive analysis of algorithmic regulation, classifying these decisionmaking systems as either reactive or pre‐emptive, and offers a taxonomy that identifies eight different forms of algorithmic regulation based on their configuration at each of the three stages of the cybernetic process: notably, at the level of standard setting (adaptive vs. fixed behavioral standards), information‐gathering and monitoring (historic data vs. predictions based on inferred data), and at the level of sanction and behavioral change (automatic execution vs. recommender systems). It maps the contours of several emerging debates surrounding algorithmic regulation, drawing upon insights from regulatory governance studies, legal critiques, surveillance studies, and critical data studies to highlight various concerns about the legitimacy of algorithmic regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/rego.12158

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Power: A Radical View
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
Pasquale, F. (2015) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674736061 · Cited by 3,796
Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization
Zuboff, S. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5 · Cited by 3,205
Traffic Flow Prediction With Big Data: A Deep Learning Approach
Lv, Y., Duan, Y., Kang, W., Li, Z., & Wang, F.-Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2014.2345663 · Cited by 3,000
Responsive Regulation
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. B. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195070705.001.0001 · Cited by 2,480
Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts
Kitchin, R. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714528481 · Cited by 2,355
Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology
Van Dijck, J. (2014) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776 · Cited by 2,203
The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x · Cited by 2,109
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1465 · Cited by 1,879

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 93 references

1 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

Carr N, 2015, The Glass Cage: Where Automation is Taking Us
Cohen JE, 2014, Information, Freedom and Property: The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology, 57
Craig PP, 2012, Administrative Law
Executive Office of the President, 2014, Big Data: Seizing Opportunities
Executive Office of the President, 2016, Big Data: A Report on Algorithmic Systems, Opportunity, and Civil Rights
Feely M, 1994, The Futures of Criminology, 173
Gandy OH, 1993, The Panoptic Sort
Gillespie T, 2016, Critical Algorithm Studies: A Reading List, Social Media Collective Research Blog
IliadisA RussoF(eds.) (2016)Big Data & Society Special Issue on Critical Data Studies. [Last accessed 11 Nov 2016.] Available from URL:http://bds.sagepub.com/content/critical‐data‐studies
Mayer‐Schonberger V, 2013, Big Data
Oliver D, 1994, Public Law, 238
O'Reilly T, 2013, Beyond Transparency: Open Data and the Future of Civic Innovation, 289
Williamson OE, 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization
World Economic Forum, 2011, Personal Data – The Emergence of a New Asset Class

Sorted by citations

Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account
Busuioc, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13293 · Cited by 652
“…important concerns about meaningful oversight and accountability (Bullock 2019; Diakopoulos 2014; European Parliament Study 2019; Pasquale 2015; Yeung 2018; Yeung and Lodge 2019; Young, Bullock, and Lecy 2019) and the need to identify and diagnose where the potential for accountability…”
Background
Fairness in machine learning: A survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3616865 · Cited by 646
Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making: “Automation Bias” and “Selective Adherence” to Algorithmic Advice
Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2023) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muac007 · Cited by 469
AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas
Birkstedt, T., Minkkinen, M., Tandon, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2022-0042 · Cited by 469
Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data: Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation
Stahl, B. C., & Wright, D. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701164 · Cited by 374
Algorithmic governance
Katzenbach, C., & Ulbricht, L. (2019) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2019.4.1424 · Cited by 359
What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability
Wieringa, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372833 · Cited by 321
Administration by Algorithm?
Veale, M., & Brass, I. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0006 · Cited by 329
Agricultural policy in the era of digitalisation
Ehlers, M., Huber, R., & Finger, R. (2021) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102019 · Cited by 233
Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law
Hildebrandt, M. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0355 · Cited by 222
Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach
Gritsenko, D., & Wood, M. (2020) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12367 · Cited by 238
Dissecting the Algorithmic Leviathan: On the Socio-Political Anatomy of Algorithmic Governance
König, P. D. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00363-w · Cited by 191
Development and Validation of an Algorithm Literacy Scale for Internet Users
Dogruel, L., Masur, P., & Joeckel, S. (2022) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2021.1968361 · Cited by 177
Algorithmization of Bureaucratic Organizations: Using a Practice Lens to Study How Context Shapes Predictive Policing Systems
Meijer, A., Lorenz, L., & Wessels, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13391 · Cited by 174
Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and ‘big data’
Andrews, L. (2019) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12534 · Cited by 172
Algorithmic Censorship by Social Platforms: Power and Resistance
Cobbe, J. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00429-0 · Cited by 183
The Biography of an Algorithm: Performing algorithmic technologies in organizations
Glaser, V., Pollock, N., & D’Adderio, L. (2021) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877211004609 · Cited by 158
Algorithmic Governance and the International Politics of Big Tech
Srivastava, S. (2021) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721003145 · Cited by 157
Fairness in Graph Mining: A Survey
Dong, Y., Ma, J., Wang, S., Chen, C., & Li, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3265598 · Cited by 161
Human Judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated decision‐making
Binns, R. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12358 · Cited by 134
Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector
Levy, K. E. C., Chasalow, K. E., & Riley, S. (2021) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041221-023808 · Cited by 165
In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making
Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.276 · Cited by 133
Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale
Quijano, P. R. (2022) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437221099612 · Cited by 157
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04053 · Cited by 646
Algorithmic regulation: A maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms
Ulbricht, L., & Yeung, K. (2021) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12437 · Cited by 125
Self-citation
Artificial intelligence of things for synergizing smarter eco-city brain, metabolism, and platform: Pioneering data-driven environmental governance
Bibri, S. E., Huang, J., & Krogstie, J. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105516 · Cited by 135
Digital Domination: Social Media and Contestatory Democracy
Aytaç, U. (2022) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217221096564 · Cited by 130
Governing Fintech and Fintech as Governance: The Regulatory Sandbox, Riskwashing, and Disruptive Social Classification
Brown, E., & Piroska, D. (2021) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645 · Cited by 112
The Rise of Algorithmic Management and Implications for Work and Organisations
Zhang, M. M., Cooke, F. L., Ahlström, D., & McNeil, N. (2025) · New Technology Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12343 · Cited by 130
Opportunity for renewal or disruptive force? How artificial intelligence alters democratic politics
König, P. D., & Wenzelburger, G. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101489 · Cited by 123
The algorithmic regulation of security: An infrastructural perspective
Bellanova, R., & de Goede, M. (2020) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12338 · Cited by 104
New Spaces of Disruption? The Failures of Bitcoin and the Rhetorical Power of Algorithmic Governance
Zook, M., & Blankenship, J. (2018) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.023 · Cited by 104
Big data governance and algorithmic management in sharing economy platforms: A case of ridesharing in emerging markets
Basukie, J., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120310 · Cited by 102
Administrative exclusion in the infrastructure‐level bureaucracy: The case of the Dutch daycare benefit scandal
Peeters, R., & Widlak, A. C. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13615 · Cited by 101
Suing the algorithm: the mundanization of automated decision-making in public services through litigation
Kaun, A. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1924827 · Cited by 97
How to regulate algorithmic decision-making: A framework of regulatory requirements for different applications
Krafft, T. D., Zweig, K. A., & König, P. D. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12369 · Cited by 95
Digital Administrative Burdens: An Agenda for Analyzing the Citizen Experience of Digital Bureaucratic Encounters
Peeters, R. (2022) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvac024 · Cited by 93
Algorithmic state surveillance: Challenging the notion of agency in human rights
Kosta, E. (2020) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12331 · Cited by 90
Datafied child welfare services: unpacking politics, economics and power
Redden, J., Dencik, L., & Warne, H. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724928 · Cited by 89
The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it
König, P. D., & Wenzelburger, G. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101688 · Cited by 87
Toward a Critique of Algorithmic Violence
Bellanova, R., Irion, K., Jacobsen, K. L., Ragazzi, F., Saugmann, R., & Suchman, L. A. (2021) · International Political Sociology · doi:10.1093/ips/olab003 · Cited by 94
An Eye for Artificial Intelligence: Insights Into the Governance of Artificial Intelligence and Vision for Future Research
Chhillar, D., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503221080959 · Cited by 96
Policy initiatives for Artificial Intelligence-enabled government: An analysis of national strategies in Europe
van Noordt, C., Medaglia, R., & Tangi, L. (2023) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767231198411 · Cited by 84
Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities
(2023) · Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3 · Cited by 82
A model of online misinformation
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Siderius, J. (2024) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdad111 · Cited by 82
Uncertainty, risk and the use of algorithms in policy decisions: a case study on criminal justice in the USA
Hartmann, K., & Wenzelburger, G. (2021) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-020-09414-y · Cited by 88
Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks
Lewis, J. E., Whaanga, H., & Yolgörmez, C. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02099-4 · Cited by 80
Do citizens trust trustworthy artificial intelligence? Experimental evidence on the limits of ethical AI measures in government
Kleizen, B., Van Dooren, W., Verhoest, K., & Tan, E. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101834 · Cited by 80
Plattform-Regulierung. Koordination von Märkten und Kuratierung von Sozialität im Internet
Dolata, U. (2019) · Berliner Journal für Soziologie · doi:10.1007/s11609-020-00403-9 · Cited by 93
The agency of algorithms: Understanding human-algorithm interaction in administrative decision-making
Peeters, R. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200253 · Cited by 78
The underuse of AI in the health sector: Opportunity costs, success stories, risks and recommendations
Pagallo, U., O’Sullivan, S., Nevejans, N., Holzinger, A., Friebe, M., Jeanquartier, F., Jean-Quartier, C., & Miernik, A. J. (2023) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-023-00806-7 · Cited by 81
Fullest COLREGs Evaluation Using Fuzzy Logic for Collaborative Decision-Making Analysis of Autonomous Ships in Complex Situations
Bakdi, A., & Vanem, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3151826 · Cited by 76
The state’s role in governing artificial intelligence: development, control, and promotion through national strategies
Papyshev, G., & Yarime, M. (2023) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2022.2162252 · Cited by 88
Enhanced self-regulation: The case of Facebook’s content governance
Medzini, R. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444821989352 · Cited by 75
Why and how does the regulation of emerging technologies occur? Explaining the adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation using the multiple streams framework
Goyal, N., Howlett, M. P., & Taeihagh, A. (2021) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12387 · Cited by 75
How do citizens perceive the use of Artificial Intelligence in public sector decisions?
Haesevoets, T., Verschuere, B., Van Severen, R., & Roets, A. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101906 · Cited by 74
Artificial Intelligence as a Challenge for Law and Regulation
Hoffmann‐Riem, W. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_1 · Cited by 72
RegTech – Potential benefits and challenges for businesses
Teichmann, F. M. J., Boticiu, S. R., & Sergi, B. S. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102150 · Cited by 69
Regulatory Technology: Replacing Law with Computer Code
Micheler, E., & Whaley, A. (2019) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-019-00151-1 · Cited by 67
Fraud prediction using machine learning: The case of investment advisors in Canada
Lokanan, M. E., & Sharma, K. (2022) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100269 · Cited by 65
The turn to regulation in digital communication: the ACCC’s digital platforms inquiry and Australian media policy
Flew, T., & Wilding, D. (2020) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443720926044 · Cited by 62
Algorithms for a new season? Mapping a decade of research on the artificial intelligence-driven digital transformation of public administration
Chandra, Y., & Feng, N. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2450680 · Cited by 70
Virtual state, where are you? A literature review, framework and agenda for failed digital transformation
Kempeneer, S., & Heylen, F. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231160528 · Cited by 67
The New Public Analytics as an Emerging Paradigm in Public Sector Administration
Yeung, K. (2023) · Tilburg Law Review · doi:10.5334/tilr.303 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
The Metaverse as a Virtual Model of Platform Urbanism: Its Converging AIoT, XReality, Neurotech, and Nanobiotech and Their Applications, Challenges, and Risks
Bibri, S. E. (2023) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities6030065 · Cited by 62
Scraping the demos. Digitalization, web scraping and the democratic project
Ulbricht, L. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1714595 · Cited by 60
Seven HCI Grand Challenges Revisited: Five-Year Progress
Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Duffy, V. G., Gao, Q., Karwowski, W., Konomi, S., Nah, F. F., Ntoa, S., Rau, P. P., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2450411 · Cited by 60
A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life
Latzer, M., & Festic, N. (2019) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2019.2.1415 · Cited by 51
Towards a responsible integration of artificial intelligence technology in the construction sector
Pillai, V. S., & Matus, K. (2020) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa073 · Cited by 49
What is algorithmic governance?
Issar, S., & Aneesh, A. (2021) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12955 · Cited by 59
Los algoritmos son reglamentos
Palop, A. B. (2020) · Revista de Derecho Público Teoría y método · doi:10.37417/rpd/vol_1_2020_33 · Cited by 49
The sovereignty-internationalism paradox in AI governance: digital federalism and global algorithmic control
Ishkhanyan, A. M. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00374-x · Cited by 48
Why Worry about Decision-Making by Machine?
Yeung, K. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0002 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Extending the framework of algorithmic regulation. The Uber case
Eyert, F., Irgmaier, F., & Ulbricht, L. (2020) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12371 · Cited by 56
Regulating Recommending: Motivations, Considerations, and PrinciplesPreprint
Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. P. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3371830 · Cited by 47
Bias does not equal bias: a socio-technical typology of bias in data-based algorithmic systems
Lopez, P. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.4.1598 · Cited by 55
Algorithmic Harms in Child Welfare: Uncertainties in Practice, Organization, and Street-level Decision-making
Saxena, D., & Guha, S. (2022) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3616473 · Cited by 62
Where are we? Using Scopus to map the literature at the intersection between artificial intelligence and research on crime
Campedelli, G. M. (2020) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00082-9 · Cited by 49
The right to contest automated decisions under the General Data Protection Regulation : Beyond the so‐called “right to explanation”
Bayamlıoğlu, E. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12391 · Cited by 44
Artificial intelligence and its ‘slow violence’ to human rights
Teo, S. A. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00547-x · Cited by 53
A big data state of mind: Epistemological challenges to accountability and transparency in data-driven regulation
Kempeneer, S. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101578 · Cited by 48
Exploring the social, ethical, legal, and responsibility dimensions of artificial intelligence for health – a new column in Intelligent Medicine
Rosemann, A., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Intelligent Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.imed.2021.12.002 · Cited by 46
Towards a Data-Driven Public Administration: An Empirical Analysis of Nascent Phase Implementation
Broomfield, H., & Reutter, L. M. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.58235/sjpa.v25i2.7117 · Cited by 47
Digital Threats to Democratic Elections: How Foreign Actors Use Digital Techniques to Undermine DemocracyPreprint
Tenove, C., Buffie, J., McKay, S., & Moscrop, D. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3235819 · Cited by 50
When Big Data Meet Securitization. Algorithmic Regulation with Passenger Name Records
Ulbricht, L. (2018) · European Journal for Security Research · doi:10.1007/s41125-018-0030-3 · Cited by 42
What Are We Actually Talking About? Conceptualizing Data as a Governable Object in Overlapping Jurisdictions
Obendiek, A. S. (2021) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqab080 · Cited by 41
‘Solving for X?’ Towards a problem-finding framework to ground long-term governance strategies for artificial intelligence
Liu, H.-Y., & Maas, M. M. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102672 · Cited by 43
Same, same, but different! Qualitative evidence on how algorithmic selection applications govern different life domains
Festic, N. (2020) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12333 · Cited by 40
Platform Architectures. The Structuration of Platform Companies on the Internet
Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (2022) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-022-00826-7 · Cited by 40
Traceability in global governance
Muirhead, J., & Porter, T. (2019) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12237 · Cited by 39
Platform companies on the internet as a new organizational form. A sociological perspective
Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (2023) · Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research · doi:10.1080/13511610.2023.2182217 · Cited by 39
Algorithmic Regulation in Media and Cultural Policy: A Framework to Evaluate Barriers to Accountability
Hunt, R. L., & McKelvey, F. R. (2019) · Journal of Information Policy · doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0307 · Cited by 49
The algocracy as a new ideal type for government organizations: Predictive policing in Berlin as an empirical case
Lorenz, L., Meijer, A. J., & Schuppan, T. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200279 · Cited by 39
Digitalizing environmental governance for smallholder participation in food systems
Kruk, S. R. L., Kloppenburg, S., Toonen, H., & Bush, S. R. (2021) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100125 · Cited by 39
On Chances and Risks of Security Related Algorithmic Decision Making Systems
Zweig, K. A., Wenzelburger, G., & Krafft, T. D. (2018) · European Journal for Security Research · doi:10.1007/s41125-018-0031-2 · Cited by 41
On social machines for algorithmic regulation
Cristianini, N., & Scantamburlo, T. (2019) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00917-8 · Cited by 37
Data Jurisdictions and Rival Regimes of Algorithmic Regulation
Johns, F., & Compton, C. (2019) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12296 · Cited by 37
Transparency for Whom? Assessing Discriminatory Artificial Intelligence
van Nuenen, T., Ferrer, X., Such, J. M., & Coté, M. (2020) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2020.3002181 · Cited by 38
What rules? Framing the governance of artificial agency
Gahnberg, C. (2021) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2021.1929729 · Cited by 35
Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms?
Gellert, R. (2018) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12349 · Cited by 35

Authors: Yeung, K.
Affiliations: The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author: Yeung, Karen
ORCID: Yeung, Karen
Venue: Regulation & Governance
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2017-07-31
Volume: 12
Issue: 4
Pages: 505-523
ISSN: 1748-5983 (ISSN-L)
1748-5991
DOI: 10.1111/rego.12158
OpenAlex: W2619503097
Cited by: 842
References: 93
Citations by year: 2026: 313 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI: 321.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
papers.ssrn.com
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Regulation & Governance (publishedVersion)
SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Regulation and Compliance Studies
Keywords: algorithmic regulation, regulatory governance, predictive policing, surveillance, recommender systems, regulatory legitimacy, big data, cloud computing, ubiquitous computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks