Cited by 24Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsStatistical Methods and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Inference

Sparse Reduced-Rank Regression for Exploratory Visualisation of Paired Multivariate Data

Open access
Kobak, Dmitry, Bernaerts, Yves, Weis, Marissa A., Scala, Federico, Tolias, Andreas S., Berens, Philipp·2021·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In genomics, transcriptomics, and related biological fields (collectively known as omics), combinations of experimental techniques can yield multiple sets of features for the same set of biological replicates. One example is Patch-seq, a method combining single-cell RNA sequencing with electrophysiological recordings from the same cells. Here we present a framework based on sparse reduced-rank regression (RRR) for obtaining an interpretable visualisation of the relationship between the transcriptomic and the electrophysiological data. We use elastic net regularisation that yields sparse solutions and allows for an efficient computational implementation. Using several Patch-seq datasets, we show that sparse RRR outperforms both sparse full-rank regression and non-sparse RRR, as well as previous sparse RRR approaches, in terms of predictive performance. We introduce a bibiplot visualisation in order to display the dominant factors determining the relationship between transcriptomic and electrophysiological properties of neurons. We believe that sparse RRR can provide a valuable tool for the exploration and visualisation of paired multivariate datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/rssc.12494

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The selected sparse reduced-rank regression model used 25 genes with a 5-dimensional latent space and achieved a cross-validated R2 of 0.38.

    “The selected model used 25 genes with a 5-dimensional latent space and achieved a cross-validated R2 of 0.38.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobak, D., Bernaerts, Y., Weis, M. A., Scala, F., Tolias, A. S., & Berens, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kobak, Dmitry
  • Berens, Philipp
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
Published
2021-08-01
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
980-1000
ISSN
  • 0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9876
OpenAlex
W4234232768
Cited by
24
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • German Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01GQ1601)
  • German Research Foundation (390727645, BE5601/4-1)
  • National Institutes of Health (U19MH114830)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
Patch-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing, electrophysiology, multi-omics integration, elastic net, neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review