Cited by 147Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Multimodal profiling of single-cell morphology, electrophysiology, and gene expression using Patch-seq

Open access
Cadwell, Cathryn R, Scala, Federico, Li, Shuang, Livrizzi, Giulia, Shen, Shan, Sandberg, Rickard, Jiang, Xiaolong, Tolias, Andreas S·2017·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Neurons exhibit a rich diversity of morphological phenotypes, electrophysiological properties, and gene-expression patterns. Understanding how these different characteristics are interrelated at the single-cell level has been difficult because of the lack of techniques for multimodal profiling of individual cells. We recently developed Patch-seq, a technique that combines whole-cell patch-clamp recording, immunohistochemistry, and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) to comprehensively profile single neurons from mouse brain slices. Here, we present a detailed step-by-step protocol, including modifications to the patching mechanics and recording procedure, reagents and recipes, procedures for immunohistochemistry, and other tips to assist researchers in obtaining high-quality morphological, electrophysiological, and transcriptomic data from single neurons. Successful implementation of Patch-seq allows researchers to explore the multidimensional phenotypic variability among neurons and to correlate gene expression with phenotype at the level of single cells. The entire procedure can be completed in ∼2 weeks through the combined efforts of a skilled electrophysiologist, molecular biologist, and biostatistician.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2017.120

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study used Patch-seq to describe the morpho-electric phenotypes for most of the t-types in MOp.

    “We used the Patch-seq technique8,17–19 to describe the morpho-electric phenotypes for most of the t-types in MOp20.”
  • The RNA extraction process may have interfered with biocytin diffusion and MOp is quite thick, making it difficult to recover complete morphologies of some groups of neurons, such as deep L5 Martinotti cells.

    “Second, as the RNA extraction process may have interfered with biocytin diffusion17 and as MOp is quite thick, it was difficult to recover complete morphologies of some groups of neurons, such as deep L5 Martinotti cells with thin long axons that reach all the way to L1.”
  • The addition of the RNase inhibitor resulted in an increase in osmolarity to the desired value of 315-320 mOSM without a further dilution.

    “The addition of the inhibitor resulted in an increase in osmolarity to the desired value of 315–320 mOSM without a further dilution17.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cadwell CR & Tolias AS (2016) Correlating cellular morphology, physiology, and gene expression using Patch-Seq. In: Using single-cell genomics to analyze neurons, glia, and circuits. (McCarroll S, ed) pp. 41– 51. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience.
  2. [24]Cadwell CR, Electrophysiological, transcriptomic and morphologic profiling of single neurons using Patch-seq. Nature biotechnology 34, 199– 203 (2016). PMC4840019 26689543
  3. [29]Herman J, paper presented at the Boston Single-Cell Network Single-Cell Genomics Workshop, Boston, MA, Nov 3–4 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cadwell, C. R., Scala, F., Li, S., Livrizzi, G., Shen, S., Sandberg, R., Jiang, X., & Tolias, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Sandberg, Rickard
  • Jiang, Xiaolong
  • Tolias, Andreas S
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2017-11-16
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
2531-2553
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2769765726
Cited by
147
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp1od008301-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F30MH095440, R01MH103108)
  • National Eye Institute (DP1EY023176, P30EY002520, T32EY007001)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007330)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB006350)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
Patch-seq, single neurons, neuronal morphology, neuronal electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, whole-cell patch-clamp recording, immunohistochemistry, mouse brain slices
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Immunohistochemistry, Neurons, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review