Cited by 220Stress and Burnout ResearchResilience and Mental HealthStudent Stress and Coping

Coping strategies: A prospective study of patterns, stability, and relationships with psychological distress

Nielsen, Morten B., Knardahl, Stein·2014·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The aims of this article are: (1) to explore patterns (clusters) of coping strategies; (2) to examine the stability of individual coping strategies and patterns of coping over time; and (3) to establish long term associations between coping and psychological distress. Coping strategies were assessed with the Brief Cope questionnaire, whereas psychological distress was measured with the ten-item version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist, in a two-year prospective sample comprising 3,738 employees. Based on TwoStep cluster analysis of the Brief Cope, three different coping patterns were identified: low coping, engagement coping, and disengagement coping. Analyses of long-term stability indicated malleable properties for the individual coping strategies as well as the three clusters. Disengagement coping strategies in the form of self-blame and self-distraction were most strongly associated with distress at follow-up, whereas baseline distress was related to increased use of these strategies two years later. Coping patterns at baseline had no main effects on later levels of distress, but levels of distress at baseline predicted subsequent use of engagement and disengagement coping patterns. The finding that specific coping strategies are malleable suggests that it is possible to modify and develop dysfunctional strategies. The associations between disengagement coping strategies and distress indicate that this kind of coping is especially problematic with regard to mental health…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sjop.12103

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, M. B., & Knardahl, S.
Affiliations
National Institute of Occupational Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Nielsen, Morten B.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-14
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
142-150
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W1995581209
Cited by
220
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
coping strategies, coping styles, psychological distress, disengagement coping, engagement coping, self-blame, self-distraction, Brief COPE, employee mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review