Cited by 62COVID-19 and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Coping profiles and their association with psychological functioning: A latent profile analysis of coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Kavčič, Tina, Avsec, Andreja, Zager Kocjan, Gaja·2022·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

While many adversities affect limited groups of people, the COVID-19 pandemic brought a range of stressors to entire populations. Using a person-centered approach, this study analyzed the most frequent combinations of coping strategies used by general population during the first wave of the pandemic in a sample of 1347 Slovenian adults. Latent profile analysis identified three coping profiles similar to those found in previous studies in specific samples and stressful circumstances: the engaged profile (active coping, planning, acceptance, positive reframing), the disengaged profile (low problem-focused coping, social support, acceptance, positive reframing), and the avoidant profile (substance use, self-blame, humor). Individuals with the engaged profile reported the highest levels of well-being and the lowest levels of ill-being. While individuals with the avoidant profile had the highest levels of anxiety and stress, those with the disengaged profile had the lowest levels of well-being, especially engagement and positive relationships. The results imply the need to distinguish between the two less adaptive coping profiles, as one is characterized by the active use of dysfunctional strategies, and the other by the low use of all strategies, suggesting that psychological interventions should be tailored to these specificities. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111287

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

9 of 25 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationown data

    The avoidant profile identified resembles the previously described avoidant profile.

    “The avoidant coping profile identified in our study resembles this profile.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Doron et al., 2014 source
    • cites Nielsen & Knardahl, 2014 source
  • Premisecitation

    Previous studies consistently reported substance use and self-blame as avoidant strategies.

    “Previous studies reported consistent results regarding substance use and self-blame as avoidant strategies (Aldridge & Roesch, 2008; Pété et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Aldridge & Roesch, 2008 source

      The Discussion identifies substance use as a maladaptive avoidant strategy and reports that avoidant copers used it. Our copy does not identify self-blame as an avoidant strategy, so the citation supports only the substance-use part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Pété et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Interpretationcitation

    The three coping profiles identified resemble profiles found in earlier studies conducted in specific samples and stressful situations.

    “similar to those found in previous studies in specific samples and stressful circumstances”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “Three of these common combinations were also identified in our research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aldridge & Roesch, 2008 source
    • cites Doron et al., 2014 source

      The Discussion and “Students’ coping profiles and health-related behaviors” sections say the study’s profiles are consistent with earlier cluster-analytic research. But the Discussion names four profiles in the present study—Low, Adaptive, High, and Avoidant Copers—not three. The “Profiles of coping and health outcomes” section describes three profiles in an earlier study. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Luszczynska et al., 2007 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The engaged profile corresponds to previously labelled engaged, adaptive, assimilative, or active copers.

    “The most extensive profile in our study, the engaged coping profile, corresponds to this combination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Nielsen & Knardahl, 2014 source
    • cites Butler et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Doron et al., 2014 source

      The ‘Profiles of Coping and Health Outcomes’ section describes an ‘Adaptive Copers’ group and a group with high levels of active coping strategies. The Discussion also characterizes Adaptive Copers by their combination of strategies. The copy does not identify an ‘engaged’ profile or establish that it corresponds to profiles labelled ‘engaged’ or ‘assimilative’; page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Differential associations between the avoidant and disengaged profiles are consistent with the dual continua model.

    “These differential associations are consistent with the dual continua model (Keyes, 2005), which posits that mental health encompasses the absence of ill-being and the presence of well-being, with the two aspects being related but independent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Keyes, 2005 source
      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • May combine two claims. 12
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Denial and behavioral disengagement are the two most central strategies of avoidant coping.

    “the two most central strategies of avoidant coping (Aldridge & Roesch, 2008; Doron et al., 2014)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Aldridge & Roesch, 2008 source

      The Discussion says avoidant copers used more denial and behavioral disengagement than the other coping groups. It does not identify them as the two most central strategies; it instead describes focusing on and venting emotions and substance use as characteristic preferences of the avoidant group. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Doron et al., 2014 source

      The Definition of Coping section lists denial and behavioral disengagement as avoidant coping strategies. It also lists self-blame and substance use, without identifying denial and behavioral disengagement as the two most central strategies. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study employed previously validated measures extensively used in coping profile and pandemic mental health research.

    “The study employed previously validated measures, extensively used in studies of coping profiles (e.g., Butler et al., 2016) and research on mental health during this pandemic (e.g., Wąsowicz et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Butler et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wąsowicz et al., 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The avoidant profile stood out for use of humor, self-blame, and especially substance use.

    “but stand out for their use of avoidant strategies, such as humor, self-blame, and especially substance use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The disengaged profile had the lowest general well-being, engagement, and relationship scores.

    “and the disengaged coping profile had the lowest scores for general well-being and for engagement and relationships.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The three-profile solution was retained as optimal based on fit indices and interpretability.

    “we opted for a three-profile solution”
    • Also stated in: § Identification of latent coping profiles · plain
      “further investigation of the theoretical interpretability and meaningfulness of the various profile solutions supported the decision to retain the three-profile solution”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Latent profile analysis of 13 coping strategies in 1347 Slovenian adults during the first COVID-19 wave identified three coping profiles: engaged, disengaged, and avoidant.

    “Latent profile analysis identified three coping profiles similar to those found in previous studies in specific samples and stressful circumstances: the engaged profile (active coping, planning, acceptance, positive reframing), the disengaged profile (low problem-focused coping, social support, acceptance, positive reframing), and the avoidant profile (substance use, self-blame, humor).”
    • Also stated in: § Identification of latent coping profiles · plain
      “we opted for a three-profile solution”
    • Also stated in: § Identification of latent coping profiles · plain
      “The patterns of coping strategies that characterize the three coping profiles are shown in Fig. 1 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Humor styles can be either adaptive or maladaptive.

    “Humor styles can be either adaptive or maladaptive (i.e., aggressive, and self-harming humor; Martin et al., 2003)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Avoidance strategies do not seem efficient in reducing ill-being symptoms, though they are somewhat more efficient than disengagement in preventing reduced well-being.

    “the chosen avoidance strategies do not seem to be efficient in reducing ill-being symptoms although they are somewhat more efficient than disengagement in preventing reduced well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Humor during the early COVID-19 pandemic could have been predominantly avoidant and maladaptive.

    “The humor during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic could have been predominantly avoidant and maladaptive, possibly reflecting the uncontrollability and uncertainty of the situation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Entropy values above 0.80 indicate classification with minimal uncertainty.

    “These values can vary between 0 and 1 with higher values representing greater accuracy of classification and values above 0.80 evidencing classification with minimal uncertainty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Celeux & Soromenho, 1996 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    PERMA Profiler alpha coefficients were 0.84 for positive emotions, 0.63 for engagement, 0.77 for relationships, 0.87 for meaning, 0.77 for accomplishment, and 0.92 for the total score.

    “The alpha coefficients were 0.84 for positive emotions, 0.63 for engagement, 0.77 for relationships, 0.87 for meaning, 0.77 for accomplishment, and 0.92 for the total score.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Avoidant individuals do cope with stress, but their coping focuses on feeling better by avoiding problems.

    “On the other hand, avoidant individuals do cope with stress, but their coping is focused on feeling better by avoiding problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    LPA does not guarantee correct assignment of respondents to classes.

    “Although LPA is a powerful statistical procedure, it does not guarantee the correct assignment of respondents to classes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The optimal LPA model was selected based on theoretical support, conceptual interpretability, and statistical indices.

    “The optimal model was selected based on the theoretical support and conceptual interpretability of the profiles, as well as on a review of several statistical indices”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study examined a brief snapshot of the pandemic, whose coping may have changed over time.

    “Finally, this study examined a brief snapshot of the COVID-19 pandemic, which represents a persistent and evolving stressor for respondents whose coping may have changed over the course of the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    DASS-21 alpha coefficients were 0.90 for depression, 0.83 for anxiety, 0.91 for stress, and 0.94 for the total score.

    “The alpha coefficients were 0.90 for depression, 0.83 for anxiety, 0.91 for stress, and 0.94 for the total score.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Brief COPE's two items per coping strategy limit the results.

    “The results are also limited by the nature of the Brief COPE, which measures coping strategies with only two items each.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Excluding the self-distraction subscale due to low internal consistency limits comparability with previous studies.

    “In addition, the self-distraction subscale was excluded from the present study due to low internal consistency, further limiting the comparability of our results with previous studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Higher stress and anxiety could promote use of avoidance strategies.

    “Then again, higher levels of experienced stress and anxiety could promote the use of avoidance strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Results for humor are mixed, with humor sometimes grouped with problem-focused or engaged coping and sometimes with avoidance.

    “Conversely, results for humor are mixed as it is sometimes grouped with problem-focused or engaged coping strategies (Butler et al., 2016; Pété et al., 2021) and sometimes with avoidance strategies (Wu & Chan, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Butler et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Pété et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wu & Chan, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Disengagement from coping with the pandemic relates to the most reduced well-being but is less detrimental in ill-being symptoms than relying on avoidance strategies.

    “It appears that disengagement from coping with the pandemic relates to the most reduced well-being but is less detrimental in terms of ill-being symptoms than relying on a combination of avoidance strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Alpha coefficients for Brief-COPE subscales ranged from 0.59 to 0.93, except self-distraction, which was excluded due to alpha 0.26.

    “Alpha coefficients ranged from 0.59 to 0.93, except for the self-distraction subscale, which was excluded from further analyses due to unacceptable alpha (0.26).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A combination of acceptance and approach-oriented coping could foster well-being and prevent ill-being by enabling management of controllable pandemic aspects and acceptance of uncontrollable ones.

    “In our opinion, a combination of acceptance and approach-oriented coping could foster well-being and prevent ill-being by enabling individuals to effectively manage aspects of the pandemic that can be”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
      “coping could foster well-being and prevent ill-being by enabling individuals to effectively manage aspects of the pandemic that can be controlled (e.g., making sure one has necessary supplies at home) and accept those that cannot.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The BCH method is preferred for continuous and categorical distal outcomes because it accounts for measurement error and individual uncertainty in profile classification.

    “which is a preferred method for continuous and categorical distal outcomes, as it uses observation weights that reflect the measurement error of the latent class variable and in this way accounts for individual uncertainty in profile classification (Asparouhov & Muthén, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bakk et al., 2013 source
    • cites Asparouhov & Muthén, 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The COVID-19 pandemic exposed entire populations to a range of stressors.

    “the COVID-19 pandemic brought a range of stressors to entire populations”
    “the COVID-19 outbreak brought on a series of stressors for entire populations”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many pandemic-related stressors were universal and shared by people around the world.

    “many stressors associated with the pandemic were universal and shared by people around the world”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pandemic was an unprecedented stressful situation.

    “the pandemic was an unprecedented stressful situation”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pandemic circumstances were uncertain and uncontrollable.

    “the uncertainty and uncontrollability of the pandemic circumstances”
    “possibly reflecting the uncontrollability and uncertainty of the situation”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coping profiles are sensitive to the type of stressors and the number and types of strategies measured.

    “Although coping profiles are sensitive to the type of stressors, and the number and types of strategies measured, several studies reported similar combinations of coping strategies within individuals.”
5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Asparouhov, 2021, Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model, Mplus web notes, 21
  2. Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2017). Mplus User's Guide. Eighth Edition. Muthén & Muthén.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavčič, T., Avsec, A., & Zager Kocjan, G.
Affiliations
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Kavčič, Tina
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
185
Pages
111287
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201750576
Cited by
62
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio de Patentes de la Universidad de Almería (Universidad de Almería) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (P5-0062, P5-0110)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
coping strategies, COVID-19 pandemic, coping profiles, person-centered approach, active coping, avoidance coping, substance use, self-blame

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review