Cited by 32Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A Theory-Driven Investigation of the Association Between Emotion Dysregulation and Suicide Risk in a Clinical Adolescent Sample

Eaddy, Michael, Zullo, Lucas, Horton, Sarah E., Hughes, Jennifer L., Kennard, Betsy, Diederich, Andrew, Emslie, Graham J., Schuster, Lisa +1 more·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Emotion dysregulation has been consistently linked to suicide ideation and attempt, but an explanatory model for this relationship has not been adequately investigated in adolescents. This study examined the concurrent relationship among emotion dysregulation, variables from the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide (IPTS), and suicide risk (operationalized as a continuous variable that increases in intensity from nonspecific to active suicide ideation to suicide ideation with a plan) in a clinical adolescent sample. METHOD: A total of 151 adolescents (aged 12-17) were recruited from an inpatient psychiatry unit. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to determine whether the relationship between emotion dysregulation and suicide risk was explained by the variables of perceived burdensomeness (PB), thwarted belongingness, and capability for suicide, as proposed by the IPTS. RESULTS: As hypothesized, the relationship between emotion dysregulation and suicide risk was explained by PB and capability for suicide. Depressive symptoms had an independent relationship with suicide risk after controlling for IPTS variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study suggest that effective treatment strategies that reduce negative cognition tied to PB and depressive symptoms would address the most proximal variables related to suicide risk in adolescents. Enhancing emotion management would serve to maintain low levels of proximal influences on risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12472

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eaddy, M., Zullo, L., Horton, S. E., Hughes, J. L., Kennard, B., Diederich, A., Emslie, G. J., Schuster, L., & Stewart, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Children's Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Sunita M.
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-10
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
928-940
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2800099026
Cited by
32
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotional dysregulation, suicide risk, adolescents, interpersonal theory of suicide, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, depressive symptoms, emotional management
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psychological Theory, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review