Cited by 57Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health via Writing

Experiencing and Resisting Nonsuicidal Self‐injury Thoughts and Urges in Everyday Life

Turner, Brianna J., Baglole, J. Sebastian, Chapman, Alexander L., Gratz, Kim L.·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

Objective We used a daily diary to examine (1) the frequency of three types of NSSI thoughts and urges (fleeting thoughts, persistent thoughts, and intense urges), (2) the correlates of NSSI thought and urges within and across days, (3) strategies that aid in resisting NSSI thoughts and urges, and (4) the prospective association of daily NSSI thoughts and urges with NSSI behavior over 12 months. Method Sixty adults (aged 18-35) completed a two-week daily diary and follow-ups every 3 months for one year. Results Fleeting NSSI thoughts were reported on 48% of days, whereas persistent thoughts (11%) and intense urges (17%) were less common. Within days, earlier stress predicted more persistent NSSI thoughts, whereas earlier perceived support predicted less intense NSSI urges. Furthermore, NSSI thoughts and urges were positively associated with same-day stress and avoidant coping. Problem-focused coping was associated with greater success resisting same-day fleeting thoughts and intense urges, as well as success resisting next-day persistent thoughts. Perceived support was associated with less intense same-day urges, but also less success resisting these urges. Over the follow-up, persistent thoughts predicted less frequent NSSI, whereas intense urges predicted more frequent NSSI. Conclusions NSSI thoughts and urges are commonly experienced and deserve further attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12510

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These urges are less commonly experienced than the more frequent fleeting thoughts of self-harm suggested in previous literature.

    “The findings indicate participant urges to self-harm lasted from 3-4 hrs to 3 days, indicating persistent and intense experiences, which are less commonly experienced than the more frequent fleeting thoughts of self-harm suggested in previous literature (Turner et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, B. J., Baglole, J. S., Chapman, A. L., & Gratz, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Toledo (US)
Corresponding author
Turner, Brianna J.
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-26
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
1332-1346
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2888778556
Cited by
57
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, self-injurious thoughts, stress, perceived social support, avoidance coping, problem-focused coping, daily fluctuations
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Psychosocial Support Systems, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Prospective Studies, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review