Cited by 0Polar Research and EcologyHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling Potential Environmental Impacts of Science Activity in Antarctica

Open access
O'Sullivan, David, Morgan, Fraser J.·2026·Transactions in GIS

Abstract

We use GPS data collected on science expeditions in Antarctica to estimate hiking functions for the speed at which humans traverse terrain differentiated by slope and by ground cover (moraines and rock). We use the estimated hiking functions to build weighted directed graphs as a representation of specific environments in Antarctica. From these we estimate, using a variety of graph metrics, particularly betweenness centrality, the relative potential for human environmental impacts arising from scientific activities in those environments. We also suggest a simple approach to planning science expeditions that might allow for reduced impacts in these environments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tgis.70369

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Benninghoff W. S., 1985, Man's Impact on the Antarctic Environment: A Procedure for Evaluating Impacts From Scientific and Logistic Activities
  2. Campbell I. B., 1987, Antarctica: Soils, Weathering Processes, and Environment, Developments in Soil Science 16
  3. Csárdi G., 2006, The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research, Interjournal Complex Systems, 1695, 1
  4. Deutscher und Östereichischer Alpenverein, 2011, Wegehandbuch des Alpenvereins
  5. Herzog I., 2010, CAA’2010 Fusion of Cultures: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 375
  6. Imhof E., 1950, Gelände und Karte
  7. Langmuir E., 1984, Mountaincraft and Leadership: A Handbook for Mountaineers and Hillwalking Leaders in the British Isles
  8. Naismith W. W., 1892, Excursions: Cruach Ardran, Stobinian, and Ben More, Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal, 2, 133
  9. Rogers S. R., 2015, Across Space and Time, 261
  10. Tejedo P., 2024, Tourism in Antarctica: Facts, Concerns, and Challenges
  11. Tobler W. R., 1993, Three Presentations on Geographical Analysis and Modeling: Non‐Isotropic Geographic Modeling; Speculations on the Geometry of Geography; and Global Spatial Analysis
  12. Winkler K., 2010, Bergsport Sommer: Technik, Taktik, Sicherheit

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
O'Sullivan, D., & Morgan, F. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
  • Bioeconomy Science Institute (NZ)
Venue
Transactions in GIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-08
Volume
30
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1361-1682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9671
OpenAlex
W7202195595
Cited by
0
References
39
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Transactions in GIS (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (C09X1413)
  • Te Pūnaha Matatini
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Polar Research and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
GPS data, terrain slope, ground cover, moraines, weighted directed graphs, betweenness centrality, expedition planning, human impact assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review