Cited by 12Insect behavior and control techniquesInsects and Parasite InteractionsForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies

Preliminary studies developing methods for the control of C hrysomya putoria, the A frican latrine fly, in pit latrines in The G ambia

Open access
Lindsay, T. C., Jawara, M., D'Alessandro, U., Pinder, M., Lindsay, S. W.·2013·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Objective: To explore ways of controlling C hrysomya putoria, the A frican latrine fly, in pit latrines. As pit latrines are a major source of these flies, eliminating these important breeding sites is likely to reduce village fly populations, and may reduce the spread of diarrhoeal pathogens. Methods: We treated 24 latrines in a G ambian village: six each with (i) pyriproxyfen, an insect juvenile hormone mimic formulated as S umilarv® 0.5G, a 0.5% pyriproxyfen granule, (ii) expanded polystyrene beads (EPB), (iii) local soap or (iv) no treatment as controls. Flies were collected using exit traps placed over the drop holes, weekly for five weeks. In a separate study, we tested whether latrines also function as efficient flytraps using the faecal odours as attractants. We constructed six pit latrines each with a built‐in flytrap and tested their catching efficiency compared to six fish‐baited box traps positioned 10 m from the latrine. Focus group discussions conducted afterwards assessed the acceptability of the flytrap latrines. Results: Numbers of emerging C. putoria were reduced by 96.0% (95% CI s: 94.5–97.2%) 4–5 weeks after treatment with pyriproxyfen; by 64.2% (95% CI s: 51.8–73.5%) after treatment with local soap; by 41.3% (95% CI s = 24.0–54.7%) after treatment with EPB 3–5 weeks after treatment. Flytraps placed on latrines collected C. putoria and were deemed acceptable to local communities. Conclusions: Sumilarv 0.5G shows promise as a chemical control agent, whilst odour‐baited latrine traps may prove a useful method of non‐chemical fly control. Both methods warrant further development to reduce fly production from pit latrines. A combination of interventions may prove effective for the control of latrine flies and the diseases they transmit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tmi.12033

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pyriproxyfen, an insect juvenile hormone, and local soap have been found to reduce flies in pit latrines.

    “Pyriproxyfen, an insect juvenile hormone, and local soap have been found to reduce flies in pit latrines [92].”

    From Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances (2015) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Results (Latrine interventions) report that both pyriproxyfen and local soap reduced flies emerging from treated pit latrines. The Abstract (Methods), however, identifies pyriproxyfen as an insect juvenile hormone mimic, not a juvenile hormone itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindsay, T. C., Jawara, M., D'Alessandro, U., Pinder, M., & Lindsay, S. W.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • MRC Unit the Gambia (GM)
  • Medical Research Council Unit Fajara The Gambia
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lindsay, S. W.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-30
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
159-165
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2001664930
Cited by
12
References
27
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Insects and Parasite Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Keywords
Chrysomya putoria, pit latrines, fly control, pyriproxyfen, juvenile hormone analogs, expanded polystyrene beads, vector breeding sites, community acceptability, Gambia
MeSH terms
Animals, Diarrhea, Diptera, Equipment Design, Gambia, Humans, Insect Control, Insect Vectors, Insecticides, Juvenile Hormones, Larva, Polystyrenes, Pupa, Pyridines, Sanitation, Soaps, Toilet Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review