Cited by 33Insects and Parasite InteractionsMosquito-borne diseases and controlDengue and Mosquito Control Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entomological studies of on-site sanitation systems in Botswana and Tanzania

Curtis, C.F., Hawkins, P.M.·1982·Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

A survey of various types of on-site sanitation systems in Dar es Salaam and Gaborone showed that many were infested with larvae of flies (mainly Chrysomya putoria) and Culex mosquitoes (mainly Cx quinquefasciatus). The mosquitoes only occurred where the pit contents had a free water surface but the flies were found in both wet and scum covered pits. The infestation rate was much higher where the latrine vent pipe had no insect-proof screen. Exit traps were placed on the vent pipes and drop holes to determine by which route the emerging flies and mosquitoes left the pit. Provided that the latrine door was kept closed (thus producing a relatively greater light intensity in the vent pipe), over 90% of flies went up the vent pipe. In most cases about 80% of Cx quinquefasciatus did the same, but in two pits very dense mosquito infestations were found and over 1000 mosquitoes per night were caught leaving the pit through the drop hole. In such cases traps on the drop holes might be used as a semi-permanent control method. Entry traps were placed on the vent pipe and drop hole to catch females attempting to enter to lay eggs. All the flies and the majority of the mosquitoes caught were trying to enter the vent pipe which indicates that odour from this source is attractive to these insects. Various possible modifications to the methods of using latrines to minimize associated insect problems are discussed; the simplest and most important is to ensure that all vent pipes are effectively screened.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90031-1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. England, 1970, The incidence of filarial infection in East Africa: a review of the literature from 1955, 82

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Curtis, C. F., & Hawkins, P. M.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Venue
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1982-01
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
99-108
ISSN
0035-9203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049385478
Cited by
33
References
7
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Insects and Parasite Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
Keywords
on-site sanitation, latrines, Chrysomya putoria, Culex quinquefasciatus, fly infestation, mosquito infestation, Dar es Salaam, Gaborone
MeSH terms
Animals, Botswana, Diptera, Female, Male, Culicidae, Movement, Population Dynamics, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Tanzania, Toilet Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review