Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Dismal Harvest: The Uneven Landscapes of AI in Agriculture

Cieslik, Katarzyna·2026·Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers

Abstract

In this intervention, I examine artificial intelligence (AI) in agriculture through a political ecology lens, analysing how promises of productivity, efficiency, and sustainability take shape across uneven postcolonial landscapes. Building on feminist and critical agrarian perspectives, I focus on the material relations of farming to show that AI in agriculture, often portrayed as immaterial, relies on deeply material infrastructures—sensors, data centres, energy systems, and extractive supply chains. Tracing how AI‐driven digital agriculture and smart agriculture reconfigure relations between farmers, land, and technology, I argue that care for agroecosystems is increasingly displaced by care for digital infrastructures, with dire consequences for the social and ecological relations that sustain rural labour, land, and livelihoods. Focusing on emergent applications of AI in agriculture in the Global South, I show how these technologies consolidate corporate power, erode agrarian knowledges, and reproduce postcolonial inequalities under neoliberal capitalism. I conceptualise AI as a socioecological fix, stressing the need to re‐spatialise and historicise technological change in the context of agrarian change, by attending to its infrastructural and ecological entanglements. I situate this analysis within debates on economies of repair, arguing that understanding AI in agriculture requires attention not only to breakdown and failure but also to the everyday practices of repair—technical, ecological, and social—that sustain digital infrastructures and reveal the uneven burdens of maintaining them across agrarian worlds. This intervention contributes to the Themed Intervention, 'Geographies of Responsibility, Care and Repair in Digital Worlds of AI'.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tran.70043

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

2 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1177/0263276418818884 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw1875 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/tran.70042 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/d41586‐023‐02447‐2 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/03085147.2021.1876984 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/13600818.2022.2039607 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/14649934221076580 · DOI
  8. 10.36643/mjrl.24.2.digital · DOI
  9. 10.1080/00213624.2023.2202573 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.008 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/tran.12560 · DOI
  13. Fisher B., 1990, Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring, Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives, 7, 35
  14. 10.14452/MR‐052‐04‐2000‐08_4 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/03066150.2017.1415887 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.027 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.010 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.026 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s10460-023-10493-9 · DOI
  20. 10.3390/plants11101297 · DOI
  21. 10.7208/chicago/9780226447919.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.7551/mitpress/11771.001.0001 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s10460‐005‐5867‐1 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/25148486231168393 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Iazzolino G., 2019, Harvesting Data: Who Benefits From Platformization of Agricultural Finance in Kenya, Developing Economics, 14
  26. 10.1080/15228916.2014.956635 · DOI
  27. 10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0015 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/joac.12468 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/544S21a · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/2394901520907707 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432 · DOI
  33. Leach M., 2014, Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature, 49
  34. Lewis W. A., 1951, Principles of Economic Planning
  35. Lioutas E. D., 2019, Key Questions on the Use of Big Data in Farming: An Activity Theory Approach, NJAS ‐ Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90
  36. 10.1525/ctx.2004.3.4.12 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/dech.12347 · DOI
  38. 10.7490/f1000research.1115402.1 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/tran.70045 · DOI
  40. 10.14763/2019.4.1428 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100010 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.3390/agronomy11061096 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/03066150.2024.2308637 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0306‐9192(95)00012‐4 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/0306312715599851 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s10460-024-10668-y · DOI
  49. 10.1111/anti.12595 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/456871a · DOI
  51. 10.2307/j.ctv1bvnfk9 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1086/508689 · DOI
  53. 10.1201/9781003337966-4 · DOI
  54. 10.1257/jep.36.1.33 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1177/0263775816633195 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1596/26506 · DOI
  59. 10.3167/trans.2011.0102012 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/25148486221107221 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/anti.12641 · DOI
  62. 10.1080/13562576.2021.1985868 · DOI
  63. 10.1080/03085147.2014.892797 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cieslik, K.
Affiliations
Global Development Institute University of Manchester Manchester UK
Venue
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-11-27
Volume
51
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0020-2754
  • 1475-5661
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review