The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dismal Harvest: The Uneven Landscapes of AI in Agriculture
Abstract
In this intervention, I examine artificial intelligence (AI) in agriculture through a political ecology lens, analysing how promises of productivity, efficiency, and sustainability take shape across uneven postcolonial landscapes. Building on feminist and critical agrarian perspectives, I focus on the material relations of farming to show that AI in agriculture, often portrayed as immaterial, relies on deeply material infrastructures—sensors, data centres, energy systems, and extractive supply chains. Tracing how AI‐driven digital agriculture and smart agriculture reconfigure relations between farmers, land, and technology, I argue that care for agroecosystems is increasingly displaced by care for digital infrastructures, with dire consequences for the social and ecological relations that sustain rural labour, land, and livelihoods. Focusing on emergent applications of AI in agriculture in the Global South, I show how these technologies consolidate corporate power, erode agrarian knowledges, and reproduce postcolonial inequalities under neoliberal capitalism. I conceptualise AI as a socioecological fix, stressing the need to re‐spatialise and historicise technological change in the context of agrarian change, by attending to its infrastructural and ecological entanglements. I situate this analysis within debates on economies of repair, arguing that understanding AI in agriculture requires attention not only to breakdown and failure but also to the everyday practices of repair—technical, ecological, and social—that sustain digital infrastructures and reveal the uneven burdens of maintaining them across agrarian worlds. This intervention contributes to the Themed Intervention, 'Geographies of Responsibility, Care and Repair in Digital Worlds of AI'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Her research examines the 'current trends towards externally controlled, intensive, monoculture megafarms', as agricultural AI is owned and pushed upon farmers by big agribusiness.”
From A Reply on Responsibility and Repair in AI : Lessons From Outer Space, Agriculture and Gay Hookup Apps (2026) · cites this paper as Cieslik 2025
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The effective delinking of the farming knowledge and decision making from the farm is both spatial and geographically grounded, as it underscores the subjugation of the places where food is produced (the Global South) to the expert data processing hubs of power and control (Global North).”
From A Reply on Responsibility and Repair in AI : Lessons From Outer Space, Agriculture and Gay Hookup Apps (2026) · cites this paper as Cieslik 2025
In the citing paper
“Paired together, Au and Cieslik draw our attention to the deep weight, havoc and damage that AI and big data, as social and physical tools of technological empire, reap havoc upon our physical environments, from the stratosphere to the farms of our planet-by which she means the farms of food and not those of servers.”
From A Reply on Responsibility and Repair in AI : Lessons From Outer Space, Agriculture and Gay Hookup Apps (2026) · cites this paper as Cieslik 2025
In the citing paper
“Cieslik poignantly argues that 'these new dimensions of care for AI introduce new forms of labour exploitation, whereby caring for the land is displaced by caring for the technology that exploits the land' (her emphasis).”
From A Reply on Responsibility and Repair in AI : Lessons From Outer Space, Agriculture and Gay Hookup Apps (2026) · cites this paper as Cieslik 2025
In the citing paper
“These violent processes fuel the decline of agricultural knowledge and experience, amp up deskilling and reproduce colonial, racist and patriarchal rule.”
From A Reply on Responsibility and Repair in AI : Lessons From Outer Space, Agriculture and Gay Hookup Apps (2026) · cites this paper as Cieslik 2025
2 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1177/0263276418818884 · DOI
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw1875 · DOI
- 10.1111/tran.70042 · DOI
- 10.1038/d41586‐023‐02447‐2 · DOI
- 10.1080/03085147.2021.1876984 · DOI
- 10.1080/13600818.2022.2039607 · DOI
- 10.1177/14649934221076580 · DOI
- 10.36643/mjrl.24.2.digital · DOI
- 10.1080/00213624.2023.2202573 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.008 · DOI
- 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/tran.12560 · DOI
- Fisher B., 1990, Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring, Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives, 7, 35
- 10.14452/MR‐052‐04‐2000‐08_4 · DOI
- 10.1080/03066150.2017.1415887 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.026 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10460-023-10493-9 · DOI
- 10.3390/plants11101297 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226447919.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7551/mitpress/11771.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10460‐005‐5867‐1 · DOI
- 10.1177/25148486231168393 · DOI · Paper page
- Iazzolino G., 2019, Harvesting Data: Who Benefits From Platformization of Agricultural Finance in Kenya, Developing Economics, 14
- 10.1080/15228916.2014.956635 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0015 · DOI
- 10.1111/joac.12468 · DOI
- 10.1038/544S21a · DOI
- 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 · DOI
- 10.1177/2394901520907707 · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432 · DOI
- Leach M., 2014, Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature, 49
- Lewis W. A., 1951, Principles of Economic Planning
- Lioutas E. D., 2019, Key Questions on the Use of Big Data in Farming: An Activity Theory Approach, NJAS ‐ Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90
- 10.1525/ctx.2004.3.4.12 · DOI
- 10.1111/dech.12347 · DOI
- 10.7490/f1000research.1115402.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/tran.70045 · DOI
- 10.14763/2019.4.1428 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100010 · DOI
- 10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/agronomy11061096 · DOI
- 10.1080/03066150.2024.2308637 · DOI
- 10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495 · DOI
- 10.1016/0306‐9192(95)00012‐4 · DOI
- 10.1177/0306312715599851 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10460-024-10668-y · DOI
- 10.1111/anti.12595 · DOI
- 10.1038/456871a · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv1bvnfk9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/508689 · DOI
- 10.1201/9781003337966-4 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.36.1.33 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0263775816633195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1596/26506 · DOI
- 10.3167/trans.2011.0102012 · DOI
- 10.1177/25148486221107221 · DOI
- 10.1111/anti.12641 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562576.2021.1985868 · DOI
- 10.1080/03085147.2014.892797 · DOI
Cited by
Stevens, N., & Gieseking, J. J. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70046 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Cieslik, K.
- Affiliations
- Global Development Institute University of Manchester Manchester UK
- ORCID
- Cieslik, Katarzyna
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-11-27
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0020-2754
- 1475-5661
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review