Cited by 3Wound Healing and TreatmentsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementOral microbiology and periodontitis research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heritable Tissue‐Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The reasons for interpatient variability in chronic wound microbiome composition are thought to be complex but are poorly known. To investigate how patients' genetically regulated tissue expression may influence chronic wound bacterial composition, we performed a microbiome‐transcriptome‐wide association study. This approach involved estimating for 509 patients their tissue‐specific gene expression from DNA genotypes, followed by associating gene expression to the relative abundances of species detected in their wounds as provided on clinical reports to the physician. Comparisons to artery, blood, fibroblast, skeletal muscle, skin, subcutaneous fat, and nerve tissue resulted in 251 transcriptional differences at 109 genes significantly explaining abundances of 39 different species. Overall, these species were detected in ~63% of wounds. A similar number of associations per tissue was observed (range 31–39), and many genes were associated at multiple tissues in distinct ways. The cumulative variance across loci for species relative abundance explained ranged from ~5%–36%, depending on species. Although the same gene was almost never associated with more than one species, ~14% of enriched pathways were independently enriched for multiple species, which may reflect the diversity of ways microbes interact with partially overlapping attributes of the wound bed. Commonly enriched pathways pertained to collagen formation and modification, cell signalling, cytoskeletal dynamics, interactions with extracellular matrix, transmembrane proteins, amongst others. This work expands the new perspective that individual genetics may partially determine microbial colonisation and infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/wrr.70055

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1099800419853881 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/iwj.12404 · DOI
  4. 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup10.S33 · DOI
  5. 10.1128/mBio.01058‐16 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s41579‐024‐01035‐z · DOI
  7. 10.1111/wrr.13133 · DOI
  8. 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.2.46966 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.011 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/wrr.12370 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41579‐020‐0385‐0 · DOI
  12. 10.3390/pathogens10020144 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/pathogens10020096 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.08.003 · DOI
  15. 10.1128/mSystems.00502‐20 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.05.021 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008511 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.098 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.08.002 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103858 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.aaz1776 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41588‐019‐0385‐z · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/ng.3679 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq351 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/ng.3367 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/814350 · DOI
  29. 10.1097/JU9.0000000000000082 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1039/C5MB00663E · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 · DOI
  33. 10.7717/peerj‐cs.251 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/imt2.43 · DOI
  35. 10.7759/cureus.3210 · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.abo0693 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0142130 · DOI
  38. 10.1186/s12879‐020‐05557‐8 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/1574‐6976.12005 · DOI
  40. 10.7759/cureus.36268 · DOI
  41. 10.1128/jcm.00046‐23 · DOI
  42. 10.3390/microorganisms9020303 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/20002297.2023.2217067 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.05.002 · DOI
  45. 10.1128/msystems.00306‐24 · DOI
  46. 10.4103/jisp.jisp_154_22 · DOI
  47. 10.3390/antibiotics13020147 · DOI
  48. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1240283 · DOI
  49. 10.3390/ijms222413614 · DOI
  50. 10.3390/antibiotics13060553 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/metabo14040240 · DOI
  52. 10.1099/jmm.0.001817 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.012 · DOI
  54. 10.1083/jcb.201103148 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41419‐020‐2592‐z · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41586‐018‐0433‐3 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.039 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/19490976.2022.2038852 · DOI
  59. 10.3390/cells5030029 · DOI
  60. 10.1091/mbc.E23‐11‐0438 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s00418‐013‐1111‐z · DOI
  62. 10.3390/biomimetics7030087 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/imm.12972 · DOI
  64. 10.3390/cells10071831 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.04.021 · DOI
  66. 10.3390/molecules23040787 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.06.019 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/nar/gkac1010 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1038/s42003‐020‐01416‐z · DOI
  70. 10.1302/2046‐3758.1011.bjr‐2021‐0181.r1 · DOI
  71. 10.1128/mSystems.00158‐21 · DOI
  72. 10.26508/lsa.202302158 · DOI
  73. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003480 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.08.009 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Omeir, K., Ancira, J., Gabrilska, R., Tipton, C., Miller, C., Noe, A., Subasinghe, K., Rowe, M., Phillips, N., Wolcott, J., & Philips, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Southwest Regional Wound Care Center (US)
  • University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
  • Department of Biological Sciences Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas USA
Corresponding author
Omeir, Khalid
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-06-27
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
e70055-e70055
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W4411711838
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R15GM141973‐01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
chronic wounds, wound microbiota, tissue-specific gene expression, bacterial species abundance, interpatient variability, collagen synthesis, extracellular matrix, signal transduction, cytoskeletal dynamics, transmembrane proteins, microbial infection
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Wound Healing, Wound Infection, Wounds and Injuries, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study, Transcriptome, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review