The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heritable Tissue‐Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The reasons for interpatient variability in chronic wound microbiome composition are thought to be complex but are poorly known. To investigate how patients' genetically regulated tissue expression may influence chronic wound bacterial composition, we performed a microbiome‐transcriptome‐wide association study. This approach involved estimating for 509 patients their tissue‐specific gene expression from DNA genotypes, followed by associating gene expression to the relative abundances of species detected in their wounds as provided on clinical reports to the physician. Comparisons to artery, blood, fibroblast, skeletal muscle, skin, subcutaneous fat, and nerve tissue resulted in 251 transcriptional differences at 109 genes significantly explaining abundances of 39 different species. Overall, these species were detected in ~63% of wounds. A similar number of associations per tissue was observed (range 31–39), and many genes were associated at multiple tissues in distinct ways. The cumulative variance across loci for species relative abundance explained ranged from ~5%–36%, depending on species. Although the same gene was almost never associated with more than one species, ~14% of enriched pathways were independently enriched for multiple species, which may reflect the diversity of ways microbes interact with partially overlapping attributes of the wound bed. Commonly enriched pathways pertained to collagen formation and modification, cell signalling, cytoskeletal dynamics, interactions with extracellular matrix, transmembrane proteins, amongst others. This work expands the new perspective that individual genetics may partially determine microbial colonisation and infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Varadi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1177/1099800419853881 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.12404 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup10.S33 · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.01058‐16 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41579‐024‐01035‐z · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.13133 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.2.46966 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12370 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41579‐020‐0385‐0 · DOI
- 10.3390/pathogens10020144 · DOI
- 10.3390/pathogens10020096 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1128/mSystems.00502‐20 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.05.021 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008511 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.098 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103858 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaz1776 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41588‐019‐0385‐z · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.3679 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq351 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.3367 · DOI
- 10.1101/814350 · DOI
- 10.1097/JU9.0000000000000082 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/C5MB00663E · DOI
- 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj‐cs.251 · DOI
- 10.1002/imt2.43 · DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.3210 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abo0693 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0142130 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12879‐020‐05557‐8 · DOI
- 10.1111/1574‐6976.12005 · DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.36268 · DOI
- 10.1128/jcm.00046‐23 · DOI
- 10.3390/microorganisms9020303 · DOI
- 10.1080/20002297.2023.2217067 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1128/msystems.00306‐24 · DOI
- 10.4103/jisp.jisp_154_22 · DOI
- 10.3390/antibiotics13020147 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1240283 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms222413614 · DOI
- 10.3390/antibiotics13060553 · DOI
- 10.3390/metabo14040240 · DOI
- 10.1099/jmm.0.001817 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.012 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201103148 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41419‐020‐2592‐z · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586‐018‐0433‐3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.039 · DOI
- 10.1080/19490976.2022.2038852 · DOI
- 10.3390/cells5030029 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E23‐11‐0438 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00418‐013‐1111‐z · DOI
- 10.3390/biomimetics7030087 · DOI
- 10.1111/imm.12972 · DOI
- 10.3390/cells10071831 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.04.021 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules23040787 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.06.019 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42003‐020‐01416‐z · DOI
- 10.1302/2046‐3758.1011.bjr‐2021‐0181.r1 · DOI
- 10.1128/mSystems.00158‐21 · DOI
- 10.26508/lsa.202302158 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003480 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jid.2016.08.009 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Omeir, K., Ancira, J., Gabrilska, R., Tipton, C., Miller, C., Noe, A., Subasinghe, K., Rowe, M., Phillips, N., Wolcott, J., & Philips, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
- Southwest Regional Wound Care Center (US)
- University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
- Department of Biological Sciences Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas USA
- Corresponding author
- Omeir, Khalid
- ORCID
- Venue
- Wound Repair and Regeneration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-06-27
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e70055-e70055
- ISSN
- 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-475X
- PMC
- PMC12203766
- OpenAlex
- W4411711838
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R15GM141973‐01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Keywords
- chronic wounds, wound microbiota, tissue-specific gene expression, bacterial species abundance, interpatient variability, collagen synthesis, extracellular matrix, signal transduction, cytoskeletal dynamics, transmembrane proteins, microbial infection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Wound Healing, Wound Infection, Wounds and Injuries, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study, Transcriptome, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review