Cited by 19Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Early chronotype with metabolic syndrome favours resting and exercise fat oxidation in relation to insulin‐stimulated non‐oxidative glucose disposal

Open access
Malin, Steven K., Remchak, Mary‐Margaret E., Smith, Anthony J., Ragland, Tristan J., Heiston, Emily M., Cheema, Udeyvir·2022·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

New Findings: What is the central question of this study? Chronotype reflects differences in circadian‐mediated metabolic and hormonal profiles. But, does resting and/or exercise fuel use differ in early versus late chronotype as it relates to insulin sensitivity? What are the main finding and its importance? Early chronotypes with metabolic syndrome utilized more fat during rest and exercise independent of aerobic fitness when compared with late chronotypes. Early chronotypes were also more physically active throughout the day. Greater fat use was related to non‐oxidative glucose disposal. These findings suggest that early chronotypes have differences in fuel selection that associate with type 2 diabetes risk. Early chronotypes (ECs) are often insulin‐sensitive, in part, due to physical activity behaviour. It is unclear, however, if chronotypes differ in resting and/or exercise fuel oxidation in relation to insulin action. Using the Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), adults with metabolic syndrome (ATP III criteria) were classified as EC (MEQ = 63.7 ± 0.9, n = 24 (19F), 54.2 ± 1.2 years) or late chronotype (LC; MEQ = 47.2 ± 1.4, n = 27 (23F), 55.3 ± 1.5 years). Carbohydrate (CHO) and fat oxidation (FOX, indirect calorimetry) were determined at rest, 55% and 85% , along with heart rate and rating of perceived exertion. Physical activity patterns (accelerometers), body composition (DXA) and insulin sensitivity (clamp, 40 mU/m 2/min, 90 mg/dl) with an indirect calorimetry for non‐oxidative glucose disposal (NOGD) were also determined. While demographics were similar, ECs had higher (P = 0.02), NOGD (P < 0.001) and resting FOX (P = 0.02) than LCs. Both groups increased CHO reliance during exercise at 55% and 85% (test effect, P < 0.01) from rest, although ECs used more fat (group effect, P < 0.01). ECs had lower sedentary behaviour and more physical activity during morning/midday (both, P < 0.05). FOX at 55% correlated with (r = 0.425, P = 0.004) whereas FOX at 85% related to NOGD (r = 0.392, P = 0.022). ECs with metabolic syndrome used more fat in relation to insulin‐stimulated NOGD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/ep090613

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malin, S. K., Remchak, M. E., Smith, A. J., Ragland, T. J., Heiston, E. M., & Cheema, U.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Malin, Steven K.
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09-19
Volume
107
Issue
11
Pages
1255-1264
ISSN
  • 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-445X
OpenAlex
W4296522606
Cited by
19
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (RO1‐HL130296)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
chronotype, metabolic syndrome, fat oxidation, carbohydrate oxidation, insulin sensitivity, fuel selection, physical activity patterns, sedentary behavior, type 2 diabetes risk, circadian rhythm, glucose disposal, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Exercise, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review