Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingThermoregulation and physiological responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of transdermal nicotine administration on exercise endurance in men

Mündel, Toby, Jones, David A.·2006·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

Nicotine is widely reported to increase alertness, improve co‐ordination and enhance cognitive performance; however, to our knowledge there have been no attempts to replicate these findings in relation to exercise endurance. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects nicotine might have on cycling endurance, perception of exertion and a range of physiological variables. With local ethics committee approval and having obtained informed consent, 12 healthy, non‐smoking men (22 ± 3 years; maximal O 2 uptake, 56 ± 6 ml kg−1 min−1, mean ±s.d.) cycled to exhaustion at 18°C and 65% of their peak aerobic power, wearing either a 7 mg transdermal nicotine patch (NIC) or a colour‐matched placebo (PLA) in a randomized cross‐over design; water was available ad libitum. Subjects were exercising at approximately 75% of their maximal O 2 uptake with no differences in cadence between trials. Ten out of 12 subjects cycled for longer with NIC administration, and this resulted in a significant 17 ± 7% improvement in performance (P < 0.05). No differences were observed for perceived exertion, heart rate or ventilation. There were no differences in concentrations of plasma glucose, lactate or circulating fatty acids. In the absence of any effect on peripheral markers, we conclude that nicotine prolongs endurance by a central mechanism. Possible modes of action are suggested.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.033373

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bridge MW, 2000, The action of caffeine and perception of exertion during prolonged exercise, J Physiol, 523, 224P

Cited by

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Mündel, T., & Jones, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-20
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
705-713
ISSN
  • 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-445X
OpenAlex
W2099923301
Cited by
41
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
nicotine, nicotine patch, exercise endurance, cycling to exhaustion, perceived exertion, heart rate, ventilation, plasma glucose, blood lactate, circulating fatty acids
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Humans, Male, Nicotine, Physical Endurance, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.