Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of inspiratory muscle fatigue on exercise performance taking into account the fatigue‐induced excess respiratory drive

Wüthrich, Thomas U., Notter, Dominic A., Spengler, Christina M.·2013·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

New findings: What is the central question of this study? Inspiratory muscle fatigue (IMF) limits exercise performance and can augment ventilatory drive, which could per se impair performance due to greater respiratory muscle work. Using magnetic nerve stimulation to assess fatigue, we tested whether the IMF‐induced decrease in exercise performance results from increased respiratory muscle work alone and/or a metaboreflex‐mediated increase in quadriceps muscle fatigue. What is the main finding and its importance? We found that IMF increased quadriceps muscle fatigue and perception of exertion and reduced performance in face of similar respiratory muscle work. This impairment is likely to result from increased metaboreflex activation. These findings support a reduction in metaboreflex as the mechanism leading to improved performance after respiratory muscle training. Inspiratory muscle fatigue (IMF) is suggested to compromise exercise performance, possibly via a respiratory muscle metaboreflex that impairs blood flow to working muscles, thereby accelerating the development of fatigue in these muscles. Cycling with IMF has also been associated with an excess ventilatory response, which could per se impair performance. Therefore, the present study investigated whether prior‐induced IMF would affect subsequent cycling performance via increased quadriceps muscle fatigue alone and whether fatigue‐induced excess ventilation would contribute to this impairment. Fourteen healthy male subjects (peak oxygen uptake, 57.0 ± 5.5 ml min −1 kg −1 ) cycled to exhaustion at 85% of their maximal work output with prior‐induced IMF (PF‐EX) and without prior‐induced IMF (C‐EX). Subjects then cycled twice for the duration of PF‐EX but without prior IMF, once with spontaneous breathing (C‐ISO) and once with breathing coached to match PF‐EX ventilation (MATCH‐ISO). Inspiratory muscle ( P tw ) and quadriceps muscle contractility ( Q tw ) was assessed via magnetic nerve stimulation before and after exercise. The time to exhaustion in the PF‐EX conditions was significantly reduced by 14% compared with C‐EX. The reduction in P tw and Q tw was greater after PF‐EX ( P tw , 17.3 ± 9.7%; Q tw , 32.0 ± 10.8%) than after MATCH‐ISO ( P tw , 10.8 ± 10.3%; Q tw , 23.3 ± 15.2%; P < 0.05), which may explain the increased perception of exertion and earlier task failure with prior‐induced IMF. The augmented ventilatory drive had no effect on reductions in P tw and Q tw after MATCH‐ISO compared with C‐ISO. Thus, prior‐induced IMF reduces exercise performance, probably as a result of the increased quadriceps muscle fatigue and thus greater perception of exertion independent of the excess respiratory drive when cycling with fatigued inspiratory muscles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.073635

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518 · DOI
  2. 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.5.1710 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.045 · DOI
  4. 10.1055/s-2007-1024873 · DOI
  5. 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2001.00314.x · DOI
  6. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00668.2001 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/026404197367254 · DOI
  8. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01341.2009 · DOI
  9. 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.609 · DOI
  10. 10.1136/heart.85.2.185 · DOI
  11. 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019477 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/BF00376774 · DOI
  13. 10.1152/ajpregu.00006.2012 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/mus.10047 · DOI
  15. 10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.9907096 · DOI
  16. 10.1378/chest.100.5.1430 · DOI
  17. 10.1164/ajrccm/143.3.462 · DOI
  18. 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.5.2059 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1164/ajrccm/148.6_Pt_1.1571 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680701 · DOI
  21. 10.1152/ajpregu.00678.2007 · DOI
  22. Martin B, 1982, Exercise performance after ventilatory work, J Appl Physiol, 52, 1581, 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.6.1581 · DOI
  23. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2165/00007256-200434020-00004 · DOI
  25. O’Cain CF, 1979, Pattern and mechanism of airway response to hypocapnia in normal subjects, J Appl Physiol, 47, 8, 10.1152/jappl.1979.47.1.8 · DOI
  26. 10.1183/09041950.005s1693 · DOI
  27. 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.186767 · DOI
  28. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.099697 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.resp.2006.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.035972 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1992.tb09446.x · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.1006749107 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0277k.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1152/ajpheart.00798.2001 · DOI
  35. 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.281.3.H1040 · DOI
  36. Sliwinski P, 1996, Influence of global inspiratory muscle fatigue on breathing during exercise, J Appl Physiol, 80, 1270, 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.4.1270 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s004210050056 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00493.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00428.2007 · DOI
  40. 10.1152/ajpregu.00409.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.resp.2005.12.007 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00421-007-0491-y · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.resp.2011.01.009 · DOI
  44. 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.2.643 · DOI
  45. 10.1136/thx.39.7.535 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1064 · DOI

Cited by

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Wüthrich, T. U., Notter, D. A., & Spengler, C. M.
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-21
Volume
98
Issue
12
Pages
1705-1717
ISSN
  • 0958-0670
  • 1469-445X
Cited by
37
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.