The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity and integration in a visual pathway for circadian entrainment in the hamster (Mesocricetus auratus).
Open accessAbstract
1. Light‐induced phase shifts of the circadian rhythm of wheel‐running activity were used to measure the photic sensitivity of a circadian pacemaker and the visual pathway that conveys light information to it in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). The sensitivity to stimulus irradiance and duration was assessed by measuring the magnitude of phase‐shift responses to photic stimuli of different irradiance and duration. The visual sensitivity was also measured at three different phases of the circadian rhythm. 2. The stimulus‐response curves measured at different circadian phases suggest that the maximum phase‐shift is the only aspect of visual responsivity to change as a function of the circadian day. The half‐saturation constants (sigma) for the stimulus‐response curves are not significantly different over the three circadian phases tested. The photic sensitivity to irradiance (1/sigma) appears to remain constant over the circadian day. 3. The hamster circadian pacemaker and the photoreceptive system that subserves it are more sensitive to the irradiance of longer‐duration stimuli than to irradiance of briefer stimuli. The system is maximally sensitive to the irradiance of stimuli of 300 s and longer in duration. A quantitative model is presented to explain the changes that occur in the stimulus‐response curves as a function of photic stimulus duration. 4. The threshold for photic stimulation of the hamster circadian pacemaker is also quite high. The threshold irradiance (the minimum irradiance necessary to induce statistically significant responses) is approximately 10(11) photons cm‐2 s‐1 for optimal stimulus durations. This threshold is equivalent to a luminance at the cornea of 0.1 cd m‐2. 5. We also measured the sensitivity of this visual pathway to the total number of photons in a stimulus. This system is maximally sensitive to photons in stimuli between 30 and 3600 s in duration. The maximum quantum efficiency of photic integration occurs in 300 s stimuli. 6. These results suggest that the visual pathways that convey light information to the mammalian circadian pacemaker possess several unique characteristics. These pathways are relatively insensitive to light irradiance and also integrate light inputs over relatively long durations. This visual system, therefore, possesses an optimal sensitivity of ‘tuning’ to total photons delivered in stimuli of several minutes in duration. Together these characteristics may make this visual system unresponsive to environmental ‘noise’ that would interfere with the entrainment of circadian rhythms to light‐dark cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLean, A., Munson, P. J., & Rodbard, D. (1978) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1978.235.2.e97 · Cited by 2,374
Neural regulation of circadian rhythms.
Rusak, B., & Zucker, I. (1979) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1979.59.3.449 · Cited by 1,402
Circadian Rhythms and the Circadian Organization of Living Systems
Pittendrigh, C. S. (1960) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1960.025.01.015 · Cited by 1,393
Neurophysiology of the suprachiasmatic circadian pacemaker in rodents
Meijer, J. H., & Rietveld, W. J. (1989) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1989.69.3.671 · Cited by 735
Moore, R. Y. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 683
S‐potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae)
Naka, K. I., & Rushton, W. A. H. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008003 · Cited by 631
Takahashi, J. S., DeCoursey, P. J., Bauman, L., & Menaker, M. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/308186a0 · Cited by 528
Self-citationDifferential effect of the rd mutation on rods and cones in the mouse retina.
Carter‐Dawson, L. D., LaVail, M. M., & Sidman, R. L. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 495
Retinohypothalamic projection in mammals: a comparative study
Moore, R. Y. (1973) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(73)90431-9 · Cited by 477
Visual Adaptation in Monkey Cones: Recordings of Late Receptor Potentials
Boynton, R. M., & Whitten, D. N. (1970) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.170.3965.1423 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock
Berson, D. M., Dunn, F. A., & Takao, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067262 · Cited by 3,629
Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms
Reppert, S. M., & Weaver, D. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.647 · Cited by 1,444
Zeitzer, J. M., Dijk, D., Kronauer, R. E., Brown, E. N., & Czeisler, C. A. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00695.x · Cited by 1,175
Cajochen, C., Zeitzer, J. M., Czeisler, C. A., & Dijk, D.-J. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00236-9 · Cited by 653
Cajochen, C. (2007) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.009 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, D. E., & Takahashi, J. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-145
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2168431489
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity and integration in a visual pathway for circadian entrainment in the hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018660
- The paper
- Nelson, D. E., & Takahashi, J. S. (1991). Sensitivity and integration in a visual pathway for circadian entrainment in the hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.