Cited by 236Tactile and Sensory InteractionsIon Channels and ReceptorsMotor Control and Adaptation

Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects.

Open access
Vallbo, A B, Olausson, H, Wessberg, J, Kakuda, N·1995·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Impulses in single nerve fibres from the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve were recorded using the microneurography technique in human subjects. 2. In a sample of fifty‐five mechanoreceptive units with fast‐conducting nerve fibres, five types were identified, i.e. SAI (slowly adapting type I, Merkel), SAII (slowly adapting type II, Ruffini), hair units, field units and Pacinian‐type units. The latter three unit types were all rapidly adapting. 3. The detailed structure of thirty‐five receptive fields of SAI, SAII, hair and field units was explored with a method which was objective and independent of the experimenter's skill and experience. A lightweight probe was used to scan the receptive field area in a series of tracks 0.23 mm apart while single‐unit activity was recorded. 4. SAI fields were small and composed of two to four well‐separated high‐sensitivity spots and often, in addition, one minor spot of lower sensitivity. SAII units typically fired spontaneously at a low and regular rate. Most fields consisted of one single spot of high sensitivity with diffuse borders. The hair units innervated ten to thirty‐three (or more) hairs, which were evenly distributed over a large area. The field units were characterized by a number of small and closely packed high‐sensitivity spots with diffuse borders. A conservative estimate indicated eleven spots per unit. 5. The findings indicate that the sheet of mechanoreceptors on the skin of the forearm is distinctly different from that on the dorsum of the hand and in the face. It seems reasonable to assume that the former is more representative for the hairy skin covering the main parts of the body.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020622

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three different types of FA afferents have been identified in hairy skin: hair units, field units, and FAII units.

    “Instead, three different types of FA afferents have been identified in the hairy skin: hair units, field units, and FAII units (Vallbo et al. 1995).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Vallbo et al. 1995

  • Each hair unit is estimated to innervate around 25 individual hair follicles in the forearm.

    “Each hair unit is estimated to innervate around 25 individual hair follicles in the forearm (Vallbo et al. 1995).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Vallbo et al. 1995

  • The presence of FAII afferents has been demonstrated both in electrophysiological recordings and psychophysically, though Pacinian corpuscles appear to be extremely rare in hairy skin.

    “The presence of FAII afferents has been demonstrated both in electrophysiological recordings (Vallbo et al. 1995) and psychophysically (Verrillo 1966), though Pacinian corpuscles appear to be extremely rare in hairy skin.”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Vallbo et al. 1995

  • The estimates imply that each FA hair fiber innervates, on average, 25 hair follicles (range 15-52), in strong agreement with earlier estimates for the forearm.

    “Our estimates imply that each FA hair fiber innervates, on average, 25 hair follicles (range: 15-52), in strong agreement with earlier estimates for the forearm (Vallbo et al. 1995).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Vallbo et al. 1995

  • Receptive fields of type I afferents are not uniform but contain several individual subfields or hot spots in both glabrous and hairy skin.

    “The reasoning above ignores the fact that receptive fields of type I afferents are not uniform but contain several individual subfields or hot spots, as demonstrated in both glabrous (Johansson 1978;Pruszynski and Johansson 2014) and hairy skin (Vallbo et al. 1995).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Vallbo et al. 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vallbo, A. B., Olausson, H., Wessberg, J., & Kakuda, N.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-03-15
Volume
483
Issue
3
Pages
783-795
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2038093917
Cited by
236
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
receptive fields, mechanoreceptors, hairy skin, myelinated afferents, Merkel cells, Ruffini endings, Pacinian corpuscles, field units, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, single-unit recording, forearm skin
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Forearm, Hair, Humans, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neurons, Afferent, Skin, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review