Cited by 151Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Perceptual learning and adult cortical plasticity.

Open access
Gilbert, Charles D., Li, Wu, Piech, Valentin·2009·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The visual cortex retains the capacity for experience-dependent changes, or plasticity, of cortical function and cortical circuitry, throughout life. These changes constitute the mechanism of perceptual learning in normal visual experience and in recovery of function after CNS damage. Such plasticity can be seen at multiple stages in the visual pathway, including primary visual cortex. The manifestation of the functional changes associated with perceptual learning involve both long term modification of cortical circuits during the course of learning, and short term dynamics in the functional properties of cortical neurons. These dynamics are subject to top-down influences of attention, expectation and perceptual task. As a consequence, each cortical area is an adaptive processor, altering its function in accordance to immediate perceptual demands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.171488

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In response to the loss of vision, brain areas normally devoted to the processing of visual information are recruited to process tactile and auditory information and even cognitive functions such as verbal memory and speech processing.

    “In response to the loss of vision, brain areas normally devoted to the processing of visual information are recruited to process tactile and auditory information and even cognitive functions such as verbal memory and speech processing (Fernandez et al., 2005; Gilbert et al., 2009; Legge and Chung, 2016; Beyeler et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2018; Castaldi et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbert, C. D., Li, W., & Piech, V.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-12
Volume
587
Issue
12
Pages
2743-2751
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1841773938
Cited by
151
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
perceptual learning, visual cortex, experience-dependent plasticity, primary visual cortex, visual pathway, top-down attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Discrimination Learning, Form Perception, Humans, Learning, Neuronal Plasticity, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review