Cited by 20Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Rapid and reversible formation of spine head filopodia in response to muscarinic receptor activation in CA1 pyramidal cells

Open access
Schätzle, Philipp, Ster, Jeanne, Verbich, David, McKinney, R. Anne, Gerber, Urs, Sonderegger, Peter, María Mateos, José·2011·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Non‐technical summary Changes in the shape and number of spines on neuronal dendrites modify synaptic transmission and circuit properties, processes considered important for learning and memory. We show, in hippocampal pyramidal neurons, that brief activation of acetylcholine receptors of the muscarinic subtype induces the emergence of fine filopodia from spine heads in all CA1 pyramidal neurons examined. Experiments to test whether changes in the cytoskeleton play a role in the emergence of filopodia revealed that the extension of microtubules, but not actin polymerization, was necessary. These findings reveal a new form of structural plasticity at the subspine level where the heads of mature dendritic spines can modulate the degree of interaction with their presynaptic partners. Knowledge of how the cholinergic system in the brain affects spine morphology and physiology is important for understanding memory formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.204446

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These observations confirm that spine head filopodia induction might trigger spine switching and potentially the replacement of inefficient with more efficient synapses.

    “These observations confirm that spine head filopodia induction might trigger spine switching and potentially the replacement of inefficient with more efficient synapses41,42,53.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schätzle, P., Ster, J., Verbich, D., McKinney, R. A., Gerber, U., Sonderegger, P., & María Mateos, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Brain Research Institute, Niigata University (JP)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-30
Volume
589
Issue
17
Pages
4353-4364
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2147452663
Cited by
20
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
muscarinic receptors, CA1 pyramidal neurons, presynaptic terminals, miniature EPSCs, microtubule assembly, nocodazole, methacholine, atropine, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Synaptic Transmission, Pseudopodia, Receptors, Muscarinic, Synapses, Pyramidal Cells, Dendritic Spines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review