Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nature, nurture or nutrition? Impact of maternal nutrition on maternal care, offspring development and reproductive function

Open access
Connor, K. L., Vickers, M. H., Beltrand, J., Meaney, M. J., Sloboda, D. M.·2012·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: Maternal high fat nutrition during pregnancy and lactation significantly reduced maternal care during the early neonatal period; but reduced maternal care was not associated with an offspring phenotype. Maternal high fat nutrition resulted in maternal obesity characterized by increased fat mass, hyperleptinaemia, hyperinsulinaemia. Maternal high fat nutrition resulted in fatter offspring before puberty and advanced pubertal onset. Adult female offspring of high fat‐fed mothers have altered reproductive function, reflected in an increased likelihood of prolonged or persistent oestrus. These phenotypic effects were not related to maternal care suggesting that poor maternal nutrition, rather than inadequate maternal care, could be the primary driver of the observed alterations in offspring development and reproductive function. Abstract We have previously reported that offspring of mothers fed a high fat (HF) diet during pregnancy and lactation enter puberty early and are hyperleptinaemic, hyperinsulinaemic and obese as adults. Poor maternal care and bonding can also impact offspring development and disease risk. We therefore hypothesized that prenatal nutrition would affect maternal care and that an interaction may exist between a maternal HF diet and maternal care, subsequently impacting on offspring phenotype. Wistar rats were mated and randomized to control dams fed a control diet (CON) or dams fed a HF diet from conception until the end of lactation (HF). Maternal care was assessed by observing maternal licking and grooming of pups between postnatal day (P)3 and P8. Postweaning (P22), offspring were fed a control (–con) or HF (–hf) diet. From P27, pubertal onset was assessed. At ∼P105 oestrous cyclicity was investigated. Maternal HF diet reduced maternal care; HF‐fed mothers licked and groomed pups less than CON dams. Maternal fat:lean ratio was higher in HF dams at weaning and was associated with higher maternal plasma leptin and insulin concentrations, but there was no effect of maternal care on fat:lean ratio or maternal hormone levels. Both female and male offspring of HF dams were lighter from birth to P11 than offspring of CON dams, but by P19, HF offspring were heavier than controls. Prepubertal retroperitoneal fat mass was greater in pups from HF‐fed dams compared to CON and was associated with elevated circulating leptin concentrations in females only, but there was neither an effect of maternal care, nor an interaction between maternal diet and care on prepubertal fat mass. Pups from HF‐fed dams went into puberty early and this effect was exacerbated by a postweaning HF diet. Maternal and postweaning HF diets independently altered oestrous cyclicity in females: female offspring of HF‐fed mothers were more likely to have prolonged or persistent oestrus, whilst female offspring fed a HF diet postweaning were more likely to have irregular oestrous cycles and were more likely to have prolonged or persistent oestrus. These data indicate that maternal HF nutrition during pregnancy and lactation results in a maternal obese phenotype and has significant impact on maternal care during lactation. Maternal and postweaning nutritional signals, independent of maternal care, alter offspring body fat pre‐puberty and female reproductive function in adulthood, which may be associated with advanced ovarian ageing and altered fertility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.223305

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Connor, K. L., Vickers, M. H., Beltrand, J., Meaney, M. J., & Sloboda, D. M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-16
Volume
590
Issue
9
Pages
2167-2180
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1584985779
Cited by
164
References
8
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nature, nurture or nutrition? Impact of maternal nutrition on maternal care, offspring development and reproductive function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.223305
The paper
Connor, K. L., Vickers, M. H., Beltrand, J., Meaney, M. J., & Sloboda, D. M. (2012). Nature, nurture or nutrition? Impact of maternal nutrition on maternal care, offspring development and reproductive function. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.223305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.