The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cohesive Zone Models: A Critical Review of Traction-Separation Relationships Across Fracture Surfaces
Open accessAbstract
One of the fundamental aspects in cohesive zone modeling is the definition of the traction-separation relationship across fracture surfaces, which approximates the nonlinear fracture process. Cohesive traction-separation relationships may be classified as either nonpotential-based models or potential-based models. Potential-based models are of special interest in the present review article. Several potential-based models display limitations, especially for mixed-mode problems, because of the boundary conditions associated with cohesive fracture. In addition, this paper shows that most effective displacement-based models can be formulated under a single framework. These models lead to positive stiffness under certain separation paths, contrary to general cohesive fracture phenomena wherein the increase of separation generally results in the decrease of failure resistance across the fracture surface (i.e., negative stiffness). To this end, the constitutive relationship of mixed-mode cohesive fracture should be selected with great caution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
Griffith, A. A. (1921) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 · Cited by 11,052
Park, K., & Paulino, G. H. (2012) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.007 · Cited by 231
Self-citationA cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation
Ural, A., Krishnan, V. R., & Papoulia, K. D. (2009) · International Journal of Solids and Structures · doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.031 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Javili, A., Morasata, R., Oterkus, E., & Oterkus, S. (2019) · Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids · doi:10.1177/1081286518803411 · Cited by 312
Alsheghri, A. A., & Abu Al-Rub, R. K. (2016) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.06.010 · Cited by 37
Thermodynamic-based cohesive zone healing model for self-healing materials
Alsheghri, A. A., & Abu Al-Rub, R. K. (2015) · Mechanics Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2015.10.003 · Cited by 31
A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials
Giraldo-Londoño, O., Spring, D. W., Muñetón-López, R. A., & Paulino, G. H. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7528848
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, K., & Paulino, G. H.
- Venue
- Applied Mechanics Reviews
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0003-6900 (ISSN-L)
- 2379-0407
- OpenAlex
- W2110827087
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cohesive Zone Models: A Critical Review of Traction-Separation Relationships Across Fracture Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.4023110
- The paper
- Park, K., & Paulino, G. H. (2011). Cohesive Zone Models: A Critical Review of Traction-Separation Relationships Across Fracture Surfaces. Applied Mechanics Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.