The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality
Open accessAbstract
In the last 25 years, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has advanced to be one of the most innovative and most successful translational optical imaging techniques, achieving substantial economic impact as well as clinical acceptance. This is largely owing to the resolution improvements by a factor of 10 to the submicron regime and to the imaging speed increase by more than half a million times to more than 5 million A-scans per second, with the latter one accomplished by the state-of-the-art swept source laser technologies that are reviewed in this article. In addition, parallelization of OCT detection, such as line-field and full-field OCT, has shortened the acquisition time even further by establishing quasi-akinetic scanning. Besides the technical improvements, several functional and contrast-enhancing OCT applications have been investigated, among which the label-free angiography shows great potential for future studies. Finally, various multimodal imaging modalities with OCT incorporated are reviewed, in that these multimodal implementations can synergistically compensate for the fundamental limitations of OCT when it is used alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Huang, D., Swanson, E. A., Lin, C. P., Schuman, J. S., Stinson, W. G., Chang, W., Hee, M. R., Flotte, T., Gregory, K., Puliafito, C. A., et al. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1957169 · Cited by 13,788
Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy
Denk, W., Strickler, J. H., & Webb, W. W. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2321027 · Cited by 9,488
A New Type of Secondary Radiation
RAMAN, C. V., & KRISHNAN, K. S. (1928) · Nature · doi:10.1038/121501c0 · Cited by 2,647
k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields
Treeby, B. E., & Cox, B. T. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.3360308 · Cited by 2,337
Performance of fourier domain vs time domain optical coherence tomography
Leitgeb, R., Hitzenberger, C., & Fercher, A. (2003) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.11.000889 · Cited by 1,854
Self-citationFunctional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging
Zhang, H. F., Maslov, K., Stoica, G., & Wang, L. V. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1220 · Cited by 1,854
Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography
Choma, M., Sarunic, M., Yang, C., & Izatt, J. (2003) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.11.002183 · Cited by 1,794
Zipfel, W. R., Williams, R. M., Christie, R., Nikitin, A. Y., Hyman, B. T., & Webb, W. W. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0832308100 · Cited by 1,676
Three-Dimensional Vibrational Imaging by Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering
Zumbusch, A., Holtom, G. R., & Xie, X. S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4142 · Cited by 1,626
Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography
Wang, L. V. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.157 · Cited by 1,400
Cited by
Optical coherence tomography (OCT): principle and technical realization
Aumann, S., Donner, S., Fischer, J., & Müller, F. (2019) · High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16638-0_3 · Cited by 449
Metadata
- Authors
- Drexler, W., Liu, M., Kumar, A., Kamali, T., Unterhuber, A., & Leitgeb, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2014-07-31
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 071412
- ISSN
- 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145258735
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 23.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.jbo.19.7.071412
- The paper
- Drexler, W., Liu, M., Kumar, A., Kamali, T., Unterhuber, A., & Leitgeb, R. A. (2014). Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality. Journal of Biomedical Optics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.19.7.071412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.