Cited by 7Radiation Dose and ImagingAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

Establishment of diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography in two large hospitals in Oman

Bouchareb, Yassine, Al-Maimani, Amal, Al-Balushi, Al-Yaqin, Al-Kalbani, Maather, Al-Maskari, Hasina, Al-Dhuhli, Humoud, Al-Kindi, Faiza·2023·Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for the most frequent computed tomography (CT) imaging examinations to monitor and better control radiation doses delivered to patients. Seven CT imaging examinations: Head, Chest, Chest High Resolution (CHR), Abdomen Pelvis (AP), Chest Abdomen Pelvis (CAP), Kidneys Ureters Bladder (KUB) and Cardiac, were considered. CT dosimetric quantities and patient demographics were collected from data storage systems. Local typical values for DRLs were calculated for CTDIvol (mGy), dose length product (DLP) (mGy·cm) and effective doses (mSv) were estimated for each examination. The calculated DRLs were given as (median CTDIvol (mGy):median DLP (mGy·cm)): Head: 39:657; Chest: 13:451; CHR: 6:228; AP: 12:578; CAP: 20:807; KUB: 7:315, and Cardiac: 2:31. Estimated effective doses for Head, Chest, CHR, AP, CAP, KUB and Cardiac were 1.3, 12.7, 6.3, 12.5, 18.1, 5.8 and 0.8 mSv, respectively. The estimated DRLs will act as guidance doses to prevent systematic excess of patient doses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rpd/ncad225

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouchareb, Y., Al-Maimani, A., Al-Balushi, A.-Y., Al-Kalbani, M., Al-Maskari, H., Al-Dhuhli, H., & Al-Kindi, F.
Affiliations
  • Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
  • Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (OM)
  • Royal Hospital (OM)
  • Royal Hospital Radiology Department, , PO. Box 1331, Muscat , Oman
Corresponding author
Bouchareb, Yassine
Venue
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2023-08-18
Volume
199
Issue
17
Pages
2148-2155
ISSN
  • 0144-8420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-3406
OpenAlex
W4385969259
Cited by
7
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Protection Dosimetry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
diagnostic reference levels, computed tomography, radiation dose, CTDIvol, dose-length product, effective dose, head CT, chest CT, high-resolution chest CT, cardiac CT
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Reference Levels, Adult, Aged, Female, Head, Heart, Hospitals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oman, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review