The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adhesion and collapse of extreme ultraviolet photoresists and the role of underlayers
Abstract
Pattern collapse and photoresist scumming are major limiting factors to achieve a failure-free process window in extreme ultraviolet lithography. Previous works on this topic have empirically proven the importance of matching photoresist and underlayer surface energy, and the role played by developer liquid in wet development. In this work, we extend those concepts and formulate a figure of merit for the free energy at the exposed and unexposed photoresist-underlayer-developer interfaces. This figure of merit provides a tool to optimize the underlayer surface energy components that best match a given photoresist and developer process. The model is tested against experimental patterning of a chemically amplified resist at pitch 32 nm and pitch 80-nm line spaces, successfully predicting the likelihood of pattern collapse and photoresist scumming. Moreover, we write a quantitative expression for the peeling force acting on photoresist lines owing to unbalanced capillary forces and the threshold energy at which film delamination onsets. It is shown that adhesion and scumming are two manifestations of the same phenomenon at these interfaces.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proper choice of underlayer materials is crucial because they are used as etch masks, increase resist adhesion and prevent pattern collapse, and impact the required exposure dose.
“The proper choice of underlayer materials is crucial because these materials are not only used as etch masks. They also have an important role during the lithographic process, first by increasing resist adhesion and preventing pattern collapse 91 , 92 , and second by having an impact on the required exposure dose 91 , 93 .”
From Extreme ultraviolet lithography (2024) · cites this paper as [92]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1117/12.2572932 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2551684 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2551471 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.915431 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2257933 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.879513 · DOI
- 10.2494/photopolymer.26.765 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.3498751 · DOI
- 10.2494/photopolymer.32.321 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2013363 · DOI
- 10.1080/0021846708544582 · DOI
- 10.1002/app.1969.070130815 · DOI
- 10.1006/jcis.1996.0598 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.proche.2009.07.193 · DOI
- 10.1021/ie50660a008 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspa.1971.0141 · DOI
- 10.1002/polc.5070340105 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms131012773 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2613437 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2583771 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150901 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00072-4 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2585004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.12.009 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extreme ultraviolet lithography
Kazazis, D., Santaclara, J. G., van Schoot, J., Mochi, I., & Ekinci, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00361-z · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Fallica, R., Chen, S., De Simone, D., & Suh, H. S.
- Affiliations
- IMEC (BE)
- imec
- Corresponding author
- Fallica, Roberto
- Venue
- Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2022-07-25
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 2708-8340 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4287010457
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
- Keywords
- EUV lithography, photoresist adhesion, pattern collapse, free energy, chemically amplified resists, capillary forces, film delamination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review