The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Lines and Spaces printing and general understanding of imaging with dark field low-n mask
Abstract
BackgroundOne of the ways to push down resolution limits in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography is to use alternative masks. New types of absorbers are being broadly investigated for current 0.33 NA as well as for high NA of 0.55.AimWe study the imaging performance of a low-n/low-k absorber (ABS) dark field (DF) mask for lines and spaces (LS) printing at 0.33 NA.ApproachExperimentally and via simulations, we investigate the use of low-n DF masks for a metal direct print application and compare low-n mask performance with Ta-based ABS masks.ResultsCompared to a Ta-based ABS mask used nowadays, the low-n DF mask brings contrast gain for dense LS. Also, for low-n masks, we observe large best focus (BF) shifts for isolated features with respect to dense features and change of bias. Hence, strong mask critical dimensions (CD) control is needed. We demonstrate how adding assist features can align BF through pitch. In addition, placing subresolution assist features (SRAFs) significantly enhances exposure latitude for semi/iso and iso-LS and improves the overlapping process window for selected cases.ConclusionsThese investigations show that low-n DF masks can enhance the imaging of LS through pitch if SRAFs are used and a good mask CD control is achieved. Our work further adds fundamental understanding to advantages observed for a metal direct print application of alternative ABS masks for the current and future EUV tools.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To overcome the 3D mask effect, both low refractive index (low-n) and high extinction coefficient (high-k) masks have been proposed.
“To overcome the 3D mask effect, both low refractive index (low -n ) and high extinction coefficient (high -k ) masks have been proposed 10 9 -112 .”
From Extreme ultraviolet lithography (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extreme ultraviolet lithography
Kazazis, D., Santaclara, J. G., van Schoot, J., Mochi, I., & Ekinci, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00361-z · Cited by 149
Ronse, K. (2024) · IEEE Electron Devices Magazine · doi:10.1109/med.2023.3336276 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kovalevich, T., Van Look, L., Franke, J.-H., & Philipsen, V.
- Affiliations
- IMEC (BE)
- imec
- Corresponding author
- Kovalevich, Tatiana
- Venue
- Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2023-04-17
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 2708-8340 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4366088708
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced optical system design
- Keywords
- EUV lithography, assist features, exposure latitude, process window, high-NA lithography, tantalum absorber
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review