Security intrusion detection using quantum machine learning techniques
Open accessAbstract
Conventional machine learning approaches applied for the security intrusion detection degrades in case of big data input ( $$10^6$$ and more samples in a dataset). Model training and computing by traditional machine learning executed on big data at a common computing environment may produce accurate outputs but take a long time, or produce poor accuracy by quick training, both disparate to malicious activity. The paper observes the quantum machine learning (QML) methods overcoming the barriers of big data and the computing abilities of common hardware for the purpose of high performance intrusion detection. Quantum support vector machine (QSVM) and quantum convolution neural network (QCNN) as concurrent methods are discussed and evaluated comparing to the conventional intrusion detectors running on the traditional computer. The QML-based intrusion detection utilizes our own dataset that implements the grouping of the network packets into the input streams eatable for the QML. We have developed the software solution that encodes the network traffic streams ready to the quantum computing. Experimental results show the ability of the QML-based intrusion detection for processing big data inputs with high accuracy (98%) providing a twice faster speed comparing to the conventional machine learning algorithms utilized for the same task.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
11 of 21 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Quantum computers can provide quadratic or exponential acceleration over conventional ML for large dataset processing.
“Processing a huge dataset input, the quantum computer offers quadratic and even exponential acceleration against the conventional ML as proposed in [14–16].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [14] Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., Petruccione, F.: An introduction to quantum machine learning. Contemp. Phys. 56(2), 172–185 (2015) source
Section 3.1 (p. 8) reports a claimed quadratic speed-up over classical algorithms for a specific quantum inner-product method. Section 2.2 (p. 5) frames processing growing amounts of information as a future expectation; the cited passages do not establish exponential acceleration or a general speed-up for huge datasets. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [15] Adcock, J., Allen, E., Day, M., Frick, S., Hinchliff, J., Johnson, M., Morley-Short, S., Pallister, S., Price, A., Stanisic, S.: Advances in quantum machine learning. Science (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16] Bisio, A., Dariano, G.M., Perinotti, P., Sedlák, M.: Quantum learning algorithms for quantum measurements. Phys. Lett. Sect. A Gen. Atomic Solid State Phys. 375(39), 3425–3434 (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Theoretically, training a binary classifier can be exponentially accelerated if the classification algorithm runs on a quantum computer.
“Thus, theoretically, the training process of a binary classifier can be exponentially accelerated if the described classification algorithm is run on a quantum computer [29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Nawaz, S.J., Sharma, S.K., Wyne, S., Patwary, M.N., Asaduzzaman, M.: Quantum machine learning for 6g communication networks: state-of-the-art and vision for the future. IEEE Access 7, 46317–46350 (2019) source
- Findingown data
QSVM classified network streams with 98% accuracy.
“Using QSVM, the classification was done with accuracy of 98%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In experiments with traditional SVM on big data, only HTTP Flooding and Port Scanning attacks were detected with high accuracy.
“When using the conventional SVM, only HTTP Flooding and Port Scanning attacks are detected with high accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For most remaining attack classes, conventional SVM accuracy was between 0.4 and 0.8.
“The accuracy of most of the remaining classes is in the range from 0.4 to 0.8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Conventional SVM practically did not detect ACK Flooding attack streams.
“The network streams containing the ACK Flooding attack were practically undefined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The QML classifiers QSVM and QCNN achieved 98% classification accuracy.
“Comparison of the conventional ML classifiers and the QML classifiers on huge stream datasets has shown significant superiority of the quantum approach (e.g., QSVM and QCNN classification accuracy is 98%).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Experimental results show the ability of the QML-based intrusion detection for processing big data inputs with high accuracy (98%) providing a twice faster speed comparing to the conventional machine learning algorithms utilized for the same task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
QCNN detected normal packets with 98% accuracy.
“According to the confusion matrix, the detection accuracy of normal packets is, like in case with the QSVM, 98%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
QCNN performed better than QSVM according to ROC curves.
“Looking at the ROC curves, it can be noted that QCNN performs better than QSVM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Conventional machine-learning intrusion detectors lose performance when the input data volume is large.
“Any ML-based classification done on a big data input significantly degrades the IDS’s performance on the training and testing stages [5, 6]”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“In case of big data inputs (that contain more than samples in datasets), even the advanced ML-based detectors degrade in quality and performance [12]:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Lavrova, D., Poltavtseva, M., Shtyrkina, A.: Security analysis of cyber-physical systems network infrastructure. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems, pp. 818–823 (2018) source
- cites [6] Pan, S., Morris, T., Adhikari, U.: Developing a hybrid intrusion detection system using data mining for power systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6, 3104–3113 (2015) source
- cites [12] Kalinin, M., Zegzhda, P.: AI-based Security for the Smart Networks. (2020) source
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
New intrusions in smart networks include polymorphic attacks with mutations that can evade ML-based detectors.
“new intrusions specific to smart networks (e.g., the forced power consumption, the dynamic topology re-building) have a wide class of polymorphic attacks that have mutations, namely, local differences, omissions, blank spaces in the operational sequences. New attacks dynamically adjust to changing work conditions and protection environments, and thus can avoid the ML-based detectors [7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Kalinin, M., Krundyshev, V., Sinyapkin, B.: Development of the intrusion detection system for the internet of things based on a sequence alignment algorithm. Autom. Control. Comput. Sci. 54(8), 991–998 (2020)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
QML methods overcome barriers of big data and the computing abilities of common hardware for high-performance intrusion detection.
“The paper observes the quantum machine learning (QML) methods overcoming the barriers of big data and the computing abilities of common hardware for the purpose of high performance intrusion detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
QML-based intrusion detection is more efficient than traditional ML for protecting large-scale networks with big security-relevant data.
“When we have a large-scale network with a big volume of security-relevant data, the QML-based intrusion detection makes the protection more efficient than a traditional ML approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The authors' stream dataset is representative of large-scale network environments to which the QML intrusion detection results are generalized.
- May combine two claims. 12
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQSVM is effective for large data, does not overfit, gives high accuracy with big feature maps, and allows use of the kernel trick.
“Among the above listed methods, QSVM is an effective computing model in case of working with a large amount of data – it does not tend to overfit, provides high accuracy when working with a big feature map, and allows use of the kernel trick [39, 40].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995) source
The paper studies classical support-vector networks, not QSVM. Section 4 describes kernel-based feature-space calculations, and Sections 6.2–6.2.2 report strong accuracy on digit datasets, including one with 60,000 training patterns; Section 6.2.1 says increasing feature-space dimensionality showed no overfitting problems in those experiments. These findings do not establish that QSVM has the stated properties or that it generally does not overfit. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40] Havlicek, V., Corcoles, A.D., Temme, K., Harrow, A.W., Kandala, A., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M.: Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature 567(7747), 209–212 (2019) source
The SVM discussion (p. 11) explains how kernels permit high-dimensional feature maps, and the experimental results (p. 5) report high classification success on small, constructed datasets. Those passages do not establish high accuracy specifically with large feature maps or effectiveness on large datasets. The discussion of VC-dimension bounds (p. 5) also does not establish that QSVM does not tend to overfit. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQCNN hyperparameters such as the number of convolution and subsampling layers are fixed, and the unitaries themselves are learned.
“As in a classical CNN, the QCNN hyperparameters such as the number of convolution and subsampling layers are fixed, and the unitaries themselves are learned [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Cong, I., Choi, S., Lukin, M.D.: Quantum convolutional neural networks. Nat. Phys. 15(12), 1273–1278 (2019) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExisting network intrusion datasets contain packets of two classes, but packet-level classification has drawbacks: many packets are not malicious in content, some attacks spread payload across packets, and staged attacks make packet classification ineffective.
“However, in practice, the approach of classifying the individual packages has a few significant drawbacks:many packets from the available datasets are not malicious in terms of their content.”
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of a stream dataset for the quantum classifiers · plain
“there is a class of attacks that can spread the payload across different packets;many attacks are carried out in stages, and an IDS based on a packet classification is ineffective in this case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [54] Kang, H., Ahn, D.H., G.M., L., Yoo, J.D., K.H., P., H.K., K.: IoT network intrusion dataset. http://ieee-dataport.org/open-access/iot-network-intrusion-dataset (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [55] Garcia, S., Parmisano, A., Erquiaga, M.J.: IoT-23: A labeled dataset with malicious and benign IoT network traffic (Version 1.0.0). www.stratosphereips.org/datasets-iot23 (2020)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [56] Koroniotis, N., Moustafa, N., Sitnikova, E., Turnbull, B.: Towards the Development of Realistic Botnet Dataset in the Internet of Things for Network Forensic Analytics: Bot-IoT Dataset. (2018). arXiv:1811.00701 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of a stream dataset for the quantum classifiers · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior work has reviewed QSVM for DDoS detection and experimentally studied QSVM on NSL-KDD and NB-15 datasets, showing readiness for intrusion detection.
“For example, [17] reviews a quantum support vector machine (QSVM) constructed to detect DDoS attacks. [18] presents the experimental study of the QSVM running with conventional NSL-KDD and NB-15 datasets, that denotes the QSVM’s readiness to the intrusion detection on common attack datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Payares, E., Martinez-Santos, J.C.: Quantum machine learning for intrusion detection of distributed denial of service attacks: a comparative overview. In: Proceedings of SPIE Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation, p. 47 (2021) source
- cites [18] Gouveia, A., Correia, M.: Towards quantum-enhanced machine learning for network intrusion detection. In: 2020 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications, pp. 1–8 (2020) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQCNN is specified by parameters, corresponds to a double exponential reduction compared to a generic quantum circuit-based classifier, and promises efficient training and implementation.
“To classify N-qubit input states, a QCNN is thus specified by parameters. This corresponds to a double exponential reduction comparing to a generic quantum circuit-based classifier and promises efficient training and implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Cong, I., Choi, S., Lukin, M.D.: Quantum convolutional neural networks. Nat. Phys. 15(12), 1273–1278 (2019) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationQML methods generalize ML methods so that quantum advantages can be used.
“The QML methods generalize the ML methods in such a way that quantum advantages can be used [28, 29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Ezhov, A.A., Ventura, D.: Quantum neural networks, pp. 213–235 (2000) source
- cites [29] Nawaz, S.J., Sharma, S.K., Wyne, S., Patwary, M.N., Asaduzzaman, M.: Quantum machine learning for 6g communication networks: state-of-the-art and vision for the future. IEEE Access 7, 46317–46350 (2019) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQCNN has exponential storage capacity, resistance to noise in input data, and high performance.
“QCNN has exponential storage capacity, resistance to noise in input data and high performance [41].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Kerenidis, I., Landman, J., Prakash, A.: Quantum algorithms for deep convolutional neural networks. (2020). arXiv:1911.01117 source
The Conclusions (p. 33) report potential speedups and MNIST accuracy similar to a classical CNN, supporting a qualified performance claim. Numerical Simulations (p. 32) show learning despite noise introduced during the algorithm, not resistance to noise in the input data. Quantum Preliminaries (p. 8) describes encoding a vector in a logarithmic number of qubits, but does not establish the claimed exponential storage capacity for the QCNN. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuantum computing technology is one of the most promising tools in the ML area.
“Instantaneous processing of huge datasets and solving the optimization task make the quantum computing technology one of the most promising tools in the ML area [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Zhaokai, L., Xiaomei, L., Nanyang, X., Jiangfeng, D.: Experimental realization of quantum artificial intelligence. (2014). arXiv:1410.1054 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors' stream dataset contains more than 10 million records and 58 fields.
“As a result, the stream dataset has been developed containing over 10 million records, consisting of 58 fields.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“The stream dataset has been developed to improve the QML processing; it contains 58 parameters such as average flag values, minimal, maximal, mean values of packet length and standard deviation, bandwidth bytes/sec, number of packages, flow duration, minimal, maximal, mean interval between bursts and standard deviation, packets per second Layer 4 protocol, stream category.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataQSVM and QCNN can be trained approximately twice as fast as conventional ML on large inputs, and this speed advantage grows with input volume.
“QSVM and QCNN can be trained approximately twice faster on a big input, and this priority keeps growing if the input data volume enlarges more.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“Due to the QML, the training time has been reduced by more than twice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenQCNN can select the most significant features with higher probability, reducing method complexity.
“The QCNN makes it possible to select the most significant features with a higher probability, which reduces the complexity of the method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningQCNN is more promising than QSVM despite QSVM being faster.
“Comparing the QSVM and QCNN detectors, we have concluded that the QCNN is more promising, despite the fact that the QSVM is faster.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataQML-based methods surpassed conventional ML implementations in both accuracy and performance.
“The QML-based methods have surpassed the ML-based implementations both in accuracy and performance.”
- Also stated in: § The experimental study · boosted
“The results of the experiments have demonstrated abilities of the QML against the conventional ML-based detectors when classifying the big volumes of input data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § The experimental study · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningQiskit and Tensorflow Quantum are the most promising platforms and frameworks for implementing quantum computing and QML.
“Analysis of platforms and frameworks for implementing the quantum computing has shown that the most promising are Qiskit platform and Tensorflow Quantum framework.”
- Also stated in: § Platforms and software frameworks supporting the QML · plain
“The most promising kit is Qiskit, which allows us to manage the resources and adapt the developed ML applications for the specific quantum computers.”
- Also stated in: § Platforms and software frameworks supporting the QML · plain
“Tensorflow Quantum library was selected for its main advantages: flexibility, ready-to-use ML models, box application packages, scalability in hardware and software, large online community, and compatibility with Keras library.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Platforms and software frameworks supporting the QML · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenQCNN can vary the number of layers and core sizes to solve classification tasks.
“Another advantage of the QCNN is its ability to vary the number of layers and the size of the cores to solve the classification task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The stream dataset and its encoding preserve the attack-relevant information needed for accurate intrusion detection.
“To bypass these issues, we introduce the converting a dataset containing attack types and normal traffic into a stream dataset. The fields in the stream are the transformed fields of the packets entering that stream.”
“To train a QML model on real data, one needs to be able to translate data from a bit representation to a qubit one. For this purpose, the encoder has been developed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The emulated quantum circuits used in the experiments accurately represent the performance of real quantum hardware.
“Cirq library executes the quantum circuits;NVidia Cuda provides the faster emulation for quantum circuits;”
“Tensorflow Quantum contains the framework structures for the QML such as qubits, gates, schematics, and measurement operators.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The labels in the existing and generated network traffic datasets are correct.
“For large-scale experiments, additional traffic was generated using the nmap and hping programs; packet capture was carried out using the Wireshark program.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The authors' stream dataset is representative of large-scale network environments to which the QML intrusion detection results are generalized.
“When we have a large-scale network with a big volume of security-relevant data, the QML-based intrusion detection makes the protection more efficient than a traditional ML approach.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conclusion calls QCNN a conventional detector
MinorThe conclusion lists QCNN among the conventional detectors, but the experimental section identifies QCNN as the quantum implementation of CNN.
“Comparison of the QML detectors built on the QSVM and QCNN classifiers against the conventional SVM and QCNN detectors has shown the promise of the quantum apparatus on big data inputs.”
“Figures 7 and 8 show the results of the experiments with the conventional CNN and its quantum implementation – QCNN.”
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421 · see citing works
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601 · see citing works
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713 · see citing works
The Theory of Open Quantum Systems
Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001 · Cited by 5,938 · see citing works
Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23474 · Cited by 4,779 · see citing works
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597 · see citing works
Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 · Cited by 4,306 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The most famous quantum algorithms we know today are the decomposition of a number with the quantum Fourier transform (the Shor’s algorithm [26]) and the unordered database search (the Grover’s algorithm [27]).”
MethodThe theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system
Feynman, R. P., & Vernon, F. L. (1963) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(63)90068-x · Cited by 2,861 · see citing works
Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces
Havlíček, V., Córcoles, A. D., Temme, K., Harrow, A. W., Kandala, A., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2 · Cited by 2,572 · see citing works
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100 · see citing works
Koroniotis, N., Moustafa, N., Sitnikova, E., & Turnbull, B. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.05.041 · Cited by 1,983 · see citing works
Quantum Support Vector Machine for Big Data Classification
Rebentrost, P., Mohseni, M., & Lloyd, S. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.130503 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
DDoS in the IoT: Mirai and Other Botnets
Kolias, C., Kambourakis, G., Stavrou, A., & Voas, J. (2017) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2017.201 · Cited by 1,892 · see citing works
Quantum annealing with manufactured spins
Johnson, M. W., Amin, M. H. S., Gildert, S., Lanting, T., Hamze, F., Dickson, N., Harris, R., Berkley, A. J., Johansson, J., Bunyk, P., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10012 · Cited by 1,891 · see citing works
Quantum convolutional neural networks
Cong, I., Choi, S., & Lukin, M. D. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0648-8 · Cited by 1,517 · see citing works
An introduction to quantum machine learning
Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2015) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2014.964942 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
On the Power of Quantum Computation
Simon, D. R. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539796298637 · Cited by 1,295 · see citing works
A fully programmable 100-spin coherent Ising machine with all-to-all connections
McMahon, P. L., Marandi, A., Haribara, Y., Hamerly, R., Langrock, C., Tamate, S., Inagaki, T., Takesue, H., Utsunomiya, S., Aihara, K., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah5178 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future
Nawaz, S. J., Sharma, S. K., Wyne, S., Patwary, M. N., & Asaduzzaman, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2909490 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm for Data Fitting
Wiebe, N., Braun, D., & Lloyd, S. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.050505 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Amin, M. H., Andriyash, E., Rolfe, J., Kulchytskyy, B., & Melko, R. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021050 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Developing a Hybrid Intrusion Detection System Using Data Mining for Power Systems
Pan, S., Morris, T., & Adhikari, U. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2409775 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Quantum computation in brain microtubules: decoherence and biological feasibility
Hagan, S., Hameroff, S. R., & Tuszyński, J. A. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.65.061901 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Quantum generalisation of feedforward neural networks
Wan, K. H., Dahlsten, O., Kristjánsson, H., Gardner, R., & Kim, M. S. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0032-4 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Large-scale Ising spin network based on degenerate optical parametric oscillators
Inagaki, T., Inaba, K., Hamerly, R., Inoue, K., Yamamoto, Y., & Takesue, H. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.68 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Experimental Realization of Quantum Artificial Intelligence
Zhaokai, L., Xiaomei, L., Nanyang, X., & jiangfeng, D. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.1054 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Kak, S. C. (1995) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(94)00095-s · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Ezhov, A. A., & Ventura, D. (2000) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-1856-7_11 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithms for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Kerenidis, I., Landman, J., & Prakash, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.01117 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Towards Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection
Gouveia, A., & Correia, M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) · doi:10.1109/nca51143.2020.9306691 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Quantum walks on graphs representing the firing patterns of a quantum neural network
Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.032333 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Classical and superposed learning for quantum weightless neural networks
da Silva, A. J., de Oliveira, W. R., & Ludermir, T. B. (2011) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.03.055 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Payares, E., & Martinez-Santos, J. C. (2021) · Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation · doi:10.1117/12.2593297 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
All-optical neural network with inhibitory neurons
(1989) · doi:10.1364/ol.14.000485 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Zhou, R., Qin, L., & Jiang, N. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11840817_68 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Security analysis of cyber-physical systems network infrastructure
Lavrova, D., Poltavtseva, M., & Shtyrkina, A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS) · doi:10.1109/icphys.2018.8390812 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Quantum learning algorithms for quantum measurements
Bisio, A., D’Ariano, G. M., Perinotti, P., & Sedlák, M. (2011) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.08.002 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
AI-based Security for the Smart Networks
Kalinin, M., & Zegzhda, P. (2020) · 13th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks · doi:10.1145/3433174.3433593 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationThe IBM Quantum Computer and the IBM Quantum ExperiencePreprint
Santos, A. C. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.06980 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Towards Prediction of Financial Crashes with a D-Wave Quantum Computer
Ding, Y., Gonzalez-Conde, J., Lamata, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.05808
Kalinin, M. O., Krundyshev, V. M., & Sinyapkin, B. G. (2020) · Automatic Control and Computer Sciences · doi:10.3103/s0146411620080155
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Nokia: Nokia catalyzes the next chapter of the internet; innovations deliver massive performance and heightened security needed for cloud and machine era. www.nokia.com/about-us/news/releases/2017/06/14/nokia-catalyzes-the-next-chapter-of-the-internet-innovations-deliver-massive-performance-and-heightened-security-needed-for-cloud-and-machine-era (2021)
- Zegzhda, D.P., Stepanova, T.V.: Efficiency estimation of the protection software for neutralization and elimination of botnets. Nonlinear Phenomena Complex Syst. 17(3), 290–295 (2014)
- Wiebe, N., Kapoor, A., Svore, K.M.: Quantum Perceptron Models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4006–4014 (2016)
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y.: Convolutional Networks for Images, Speech, and Time Series, pp. 276–279 (2003)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Securing massive IoT in 6G: Recent solutions, architectures, future directions
Alotaibi, A. I., & Barnawi, A. (2023) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2023.100715 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives
Lamichhane, P., & Rawat, D. B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3573244 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
QML-IDS: Quantum Machine Learning Intrusion Detection System
Abreu, D. M. D., Rothenberg, C. E., & Abelém, A. (2024) · IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) · doi:10.1109/iscc61673.2024.10733655 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Network Anomaly Detection Using Quantum Neural Networks on Noisy Quantum Computers
Kukliansky, A., Orescanin, M., Bollmann, C. A., & Huffmire, T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3359574 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Rishiwal, V., Agarwal, U., Yadav, M., Tanwar, S., Garg, D., & Guizani, M. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3535414 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Detection of malicious URLs using machine learning
(2024) · doi:10.1007/s11276-024-03700-w · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Houda, Z. A. E., Moudoud, H., Brik, B., & Adil, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3458985 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Quantum intrusion detection system using outlier analysis
Kim, T. H., & Madhavi, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78389-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Quantum‐Neural Network Model for Platform Independent Ddos Attack Classification in Cyber Security
Küçükkara, M. Y., Atban, F., & Bayılmış, C. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400084 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
QuIDS: A Quantum Support Vector machine-based Intrusion Detection System for IoT networks
Kumar, R., & Swarnkar, M. (2024) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104072 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Arnob, A. K. B., Chowdhury, R. R., Chaiti, N. A., Saha, S. K., & Roy, A. (2025) · Journal of Edge Computing · doi:10.55056/jec.885 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection Systems, a Systematic Literature Review
Nicesio, O. K., Leal, A. G., & Gava, V. L. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC) · doi:10.1109/icaic57335.2023.10044125 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Quantum Computing in Telecommunication—A Survey
Phillipson, F. (2023) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math11153423 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bellante, A., Fioravanti, T., Carminati, M., Zanero, S., & Luongo, A. (2025) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2025.104341 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning for Cybersecurity: Evaluating Malicious URL Detection
Eze, L., Chaudhry, U. B., & Jahankhani, H. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14091827 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ogab, M., Zaidi, S., Bourouis, A., & Calafate, C. T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3575236 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
QuantumNetSec: Quantum Machine Learning for Network Security
Abreu, D. M. D., Moura, D., Rothenberg, C. E., & Abelém, A. (2025) · International Journal of Network Management · doi:10.1002/nem.70018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Cardona, L. F., Luna, J. A. G., & Restrepo-Carmona, J. A. (2024) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm17080352 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Quantum Clustering for Cybersecurity
Maouaki, W. E., Innan, N., Marchisio, A., Said, T., Bennai, M., & Shafique, M. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.10243 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Survey on Unified Threat Management (UTM) Systems for Home Networks
Siddiqui, A., Rimal, B. P., Martin Reisslein, B., & Wang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3382470 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Cyber-Physical System for Industrial Automation Using Quantum Deep Learning
Rajawat, A. S., Goyal, S. B., Bedi, P., Constantin, N. B., Raboacă, M. S., & Verma, C. (2022) · International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) · doi:10.1109/smart55829.2022.10047730 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
MetaWatch: Trends, Challenges, and Future of Network Intrusion Detection in the Metaverse
Nkoro, E. C., Njoku, J. N., Nwakanma, C. I., Lee, J., & Kim, D. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3568477 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Han, H., Yao, J. P., Wu, Y., et al. (2024) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11082-023-06185-7 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
RetractedQuantum Machine Learning in Intrusion Detection Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study
Faker, O., & Çağıltay, N. E. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7886-1_9 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
PETRAK: A solution against DDoS attacks in vehicular networks
Verma, A., Saha, R., Kumar, G., & Conti, M. (2024) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2024.04.025 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Network attack traffic detection with hybrid quantum-enhanced convolution neural network
Wang, Z., Fok, K. W., & Thing, V. L. L. (2025) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-025-00278-0 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
One Dimensional Conv-BiLSTM Network with Attention Mechanism for IoT Intrusion Detection
Omarov, B., Sailaukyzy, Z., BIGALIYEVA, A., Kereyev, A., Naizabayeva, L., & Dautbayeva, A. (2023) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2023.042469 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A hybrid quantum-neural network for heart disease classification
Verdone, A., Succetti, F., Ceschini, A., Rosato, A., Fioravanti, A., & Panella, M. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.109185 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Survey of Quantum Machine Learning in IoT Application Field
Pradhan, M. (2024) · International Conference on IoT Based Control Networks and Intelligent Systems (ICICNIS) · doi:10.1109/icicnis64247.2024.10823197 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
AIoT and Its Trust Models to Enhance Societal Applications Using Intelligent Technologies
Barik, K., Misra, S., Mohan, R., & Mishra, B. (2024) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53433-1_16 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kaissar, A., Nassif, A. B., & Bouridane, A. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18050234 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Bhuvaneshwari, B., Balusamy, B., Dhanaraj, R. K., & Ravi, V. (2023) · International Journal of Communication Systems · doi:10.1002/dac.5571 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Quantum Exploration in Ransomware Detection with Conventional Machine Learning Approaches
Kaur, M., Jain, K., Singla, A., & Kadian, K. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Communications (InC4) · doi:10.1109/inc460750.2024.10649082 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
qIDS: Sistema de Detecção de Ataques baseado em Aprendizado de Máquina Quântico Híbrido
Abreu, D. M. D., Rothenberg, C. R. E., & Abelém, A. (2024) · doi:10.5753/sbrc.2024.1353 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Reddy, N. R., Dalton, G. A., Swathi, K., Subrahmanyam, D. V. S. S., Lakshmi Kranthi, G., & Nagaraju, G. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-41015-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Comparison Between Classical and Quantum Machine Learning for Mobile App Traffic Classification
Spadari, V., Guarino, I., Ciuonzo, D., & Pescapè, A. (2024) · IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) · doi:10.1109/sec62691.2024.00053 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning for Phishing URLs Detection: Implementation and Evaluation with Qiskit
Wei, Y., Sekiya, Y., Nakayama, M., & Todo, S. (2025) · International Conference on Information and Network Technologies (ICINT) · doi:10.1109/icint65528.2025.11030883 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Benchmarking quantum machine learning methods for intrusion detection on noisy quantum computers
Cirillo, F., Esposito, C., & Seo, J. T. (2026) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-026-00379-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Chengxi, H., Rajawat, A. S., Goyal, S. B., & Solanki, R. K. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50887-5_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Intrusion Detection Datasets for IIoT and ICS: A Taxonomic Review with a Decision-Aid Scoring Rubric
Termanini, A., Bourdoucen, H., Al‐Abri, D., & Maashri, A. A. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26134099 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Tawfik, M., Tarazi, H., Dalalah, A., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45738-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Advancements in Quantum Machine Learning for Intrusion Detection
Payares, E., & Martínez-Santos, J. C. (2023) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-8422-7.ch009 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Intrusion Detection System via Classical SVM and Quantum SVM
Upadhyay, A., Namjoshi, R., Jain, R., Patel, J., & Gayathri, M. K. (2023) · doi:10.1002/9781394167401.ch26 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mustafa, S., Li, G., Wang, K., Fu, G., Anwar, F., Arshad, G., & Lin, L. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.114909 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Research Oriented Reviewing of Quantum Machine Learning
Aishwarya, C., Venkatesan, M., & Prabhavathy, P. (2023) · International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub · doi:10.47392/irjash.2023.s022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Analysis of AI and Optimization Approaches for Cyber System Anomaly Identification
Gajendiran., R., Senthil, M., & Ramalingam, M. (2025) · International Conference on Data Science and Network Security (ICDSNS) · doi:10.1109/icdsns65743.2025.11168527 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pondavakam, S., Singh, S. K., Rishiwal, V., & Park, J. H. (2026) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.70439 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
QUANTUM MACHINE LEARNING FOR NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS, A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Nicesio, O. K., Leal, A. G., & Gava, V. L. (2023) · CONTECSI - International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management · doi:10.5748/19contecsi/pse/sec/7088 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Intrusion detection with improved quantum neural network: A bigdata perspective
Nithya, B. N., & Uppala, H. (2025) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2025.108102 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A Survey of Quantum Machine Learning: Understanding the Current Landscape and Future Opportunities
Singh, K. R., Badhiye, S. S., Gupta, K., et al. (2025) · Operations Research Forum · doi:10.1007/s43069-025-00569-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Quantum Artificial Intelligence for Critical Infrastructure: A Survey and Vision
Chen, S. Y.-C., & Chen, K. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11227684
Gül, M. F., & Bakır, H. (2026) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-025-08118-5
Novel Quantum Ensemble Machine Learning Models for IoT Intrusion Detection
Okekeogbu, C. C., Mostafa, S. A., & Patooghy, A. (2026) · IEEE Dallas Circuits and Systems Conference (DCAS) · doi:10.1109/dcas69364.2026.11544356
Adversarial Robustness in Quantum Machine Learning: A Scoping Review
Kustiawan, Y. A., & Ghauth, K. I. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15040233 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Intrusion Detection of Power Systems with Quantum Neural Networks
Peng, L., Meikang Qiu, A., & Li, C. (2025) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc58881.2025.11342482
Adhikari, I., Saffari, M., & Asrari, . (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10334218/v1
Паршин, Е. А., Zakharov, A. S., Васильевич, Т. А., Fedorov, N. N., & Bulatov, M. F. (2026) · 2018Systems of Signal Synchronization, Generating and Processing in Telecommunications (SYNCHROINFO) · doi:10.1109/synchroinfo70145.2026.11613437
Natarajan, V. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5051-4_2
Benchmarking Classical and Quantum Machine Learning for Intrusion Detection Across Multiple Datasets
Mahmoud, T. M., & Kaabouch, N. (2026) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · doi:10.1109/icecet65726.2026.11632866
AI-enabled cyber threat detection for IoT-based critical infrastructure
Dey, A. K., Gupta, G. P., & Sahu, S. P. (2026) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/bs.adcom.2026.03.003
Li, X., Wang, B., Wang, C., Cui, Y., & Liu, W. B. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3563-6_34
An Explainable Hybrid Quantum Classical Framework for Malicious QR Code DetectionPreprint
Nabila, N., Sadi, A. H. M. S., Shahriyar, M. F., & Sayeed, M. S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7305681
Hybrid quantum–classical AI models for secure communications: a systematic review
Kyiewu, B., Amponsah, C., Henry, O., Bessa-Simons, L., & Komba, R. (2026) · Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1186/s43067-026-00390-6
Survey of Quantum Kernel Methods for Detection Systems and Security Analytics
Nieto-Morales, A., & Gil-Merino, R. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05748-8_23 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Poojashree, K., Meena, S., & Celsiya, C. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5832-0.ch006
Mishra, A., Vedula, V., Mishra, A., & Sharma, S. (2026) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a19080653
Rezaei, P., Rahgozar, B., Khan, M. S., Yadollahi, M., & SaberiKamarposhti, M. (2026) · IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA) · doi:10.1109/cspa68262.2026.11517902
- Authors
- Kalinin, M., & Krundyshev, V.
- Affiliations
- Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Kalinin, Maxim
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques
- Published
- 2022-06-24
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-136
- ISSN
- 1772-9890 (ISSN-L)
- 2263-8733
- PMC
- PMC9226281
- OpenAlex
- W4283373641
- Semantic Scholar
- 327e0fe8cf65aafb440f159a3095b6c2d7a446b8
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (075-15-2021-1333, 075-15-, Priority 2030")
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- intrusion detection, quantum machine learning, quantum support vector machine, quantum convolutional neural networks, big data, malicious activity detection, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review