Cited by 48Advancements in Photolithography TechniquesOptical Coatings and GratingsAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Advances in multilayer reflective coatings for extreme ultraviolet lithography

Abstract

Multilayer mirror coatings which reflect extreme UV (EUV) radiation are a key enabling technology for EUV lithography but must meet stringent requirements in terms of film quality, stability, and thickness control across multi optical elements up to 300 nm in diameter. Deposition technology has been dramatically improved to meet those specifications for thickness control and repeatability over large curved optical substrates. Coating uniformity was improved to +/- 0.055 percent peak-to-valley (P-V) on 140- mm flats and +/- 0.1 percent P-V across 160 mm curved substrates. the run-to-run reproducibility of the reflectance peak wavelength was improved to 0.13 percent on flats to enable fabrication of wavelength-matched sets of optics. Multilayers with reflectances of 67.5 percent at 13.42 nm and 70.2 percent at 11.34 nm are typically achieved for Mo/Si and Mo/Be multilayers, respectively. Also, we have recently achieved a reflectance of 70.1 percent at 13.5 nm for a Mo/Si multilayer deposited with a modified process. The reflectance and stress of these multilayers appear to be stable relative to the requirements for application to EUV lithography. These improvements in EUV multilayer mirror technology enable us to meet the stringent specifications for coating the large optical substrates for our next- generation EUV lithography system. The primary remaining issues are improving the run-to-run wavelength repeatability on curved optics to realize the maximum optical throughput, and verifying long-term stability of the multilayers within the environment of a production EUV lithographic system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.351156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Folta, J. A., Bajt, S., Barbee, Jr., Grabner, R. F., Mirkarimi, P. B., Nguyen, T. D., Schmidt, M. A., Spiller, E. A., Walton, C. C., Wedowski, M., & Montcalm, C.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
1999-06-25
Volume
3676
Pages
702
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088009928
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Optical Coatings and Gratings
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Keywords
EUV lithography, EUV multilayer mirrors, Mo/Si multilayers, coating uniformity, coating thickness control, reflectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review