Cited by 54Advancements in Photolithography TechniquesAdvanced optical system designBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Resolution, LER, and sensitivity limitations of photoresists

Open access

Abstract

Recent experimental results and modeling both indicate that whereas it is possible to optimize a photoresist and process to achieve separately a desired resolution or line edge roughness or sensitivity, it will be difficult if not impossible to achieve all three simultaneously using current standard chemically amplified photoresists and processes. This tradeoff among Resolution, Line Edge Roughness (LER) and Sensitivity is termed the RLS tradeoff. Here we review the progress to date of a SEMATECH-funded program to develop an experimentally verified model of the relationship among resolution, LER and sensitivity and use it to determine approaches for "breaking" the RLS tradeoff.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.772763

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a well-documented resolution-line edge/width roughness-sensitivity trade-off, wherein simultaneously optimizing the three performance parameters is a challenge.

    “This is the well -documented resolution -line edge/width roughnesssensitivity trade -off 90 , wherein simultaneously optimizing the three performance parameters is a challenge.”

    From Extreme ultraviolet lithography (2024) · cites this paper as [90]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gallatin, G. M., Naulleau, P., Niakoula, D., Brainard, R., Hassanein, E., Matyi, R., Thackeray, J., Spear, K., & Dean, K.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • ROHM (JP)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2008-03-14
Volume
6921
Pages
69211E
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083672051
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced optical system design
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
Keywords
photoresist, resolution, line edge roughness, sensitivity, chemically amplified resists, lithography, SEMATECH

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review