The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66
Open accessAbstract
This document presents recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) for quality assurance of computed-tomography- (CT) simulators and CT-simulation process. This report was prepared by Task Group No. 66 of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. It was approved by the Radiation Therapy Committee and by the AAPM Science Council.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kalender, W. A., Seissler, W., Klotz, E., & Vock, P. (1990) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.176.1.2353088 · Cited by 1,036
Fraass, B., Doppke, K., Hunt, M., Kutcher, G., Starkschall, G., Stern, R., & Van Dyke, J. (1998) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598373 · Cited by 911
A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography
Shope, T. B., Gagne, R. M., & Johnson, G. C. (1981) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.594995 · Cited by 435
Stovall, M., Blackwell, C. R., Cundiff, J., Novack, D. H., Palta, J. R., Wagner, L. K., Webster, E. W., & Shalek, R. J. (1995) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.597525 · Cited by 400
Self-citationGoitein, M., Abrams, M., Rowell, D., Pollari, H., & Wiles, J. (1983) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(83)90003-2 · Cited by 392
Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system
McCollough, C. H., & Zink, F. E. (1999) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598777 · Cited by 386
Self-citationComputation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiotherapy treatment design
Sherouse, G. W., Novins, K., & Chaney, E. L. (1990) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(90)90074-t · Cited by 193
Kalender, W. A., Polacin, A., & Süss, C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00001 · Cited by 182
Technical advances in multi–slice spiral CT
Fuchs, T. O. J., Kachelrieß, M., & Kalender, W. A. (2000) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00269-2 · Cited by 136
Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners
Lin, P. P., Beck, T., Borras, C., et al. (1993) · doi:10.37206/38 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Clerkin, C., Brennan, S., & Mullaney, L. M. (2018) · Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2018.07.012 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Mutic, S., Palta, J. R., Butker, E. K., Das, I. J., Huq, M. S., Loo, L.-N. D., Salter, B. J., McCollough, C. H., & Van Dyk, J.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-24
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2762-2792
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127499245
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.1609271
- The paper
- Mutic, S., Palta, J. R., Butker, E. K., Das, I. J., Huq, M. S., Loo, L.-N. D., Salter, B. J., McCollough, C. H., & Van Dyk, J. (2003). Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1609271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
