The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers
Abstract
Speech recognition performance was measured in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners with maskers consisting of either steady-state speech-spectrum-shaped noise or a competing sentence. Target sentences from a male talker were presented in the presence of one of three competing talkers (same male, different male, or female) or speech-spectrum-shaped noise generated from this talker at several target-to-masker ratios. For the normal-hearing listeners, target-masker combinations were processed through a noise-excited vocoder designed to simulate a cochlear implant. With unprocessed stimuli, a normal-hearing control group maintained high levels of intelligibility down to target-to-masker ratios as low as 0 dB and showed a release from masking, producing better performance with single-talker maskers than with steady-state noise. In contrast, no masking release was observed in either implant or normal-hearing subjects listening through an implant simulation. The performance of the simulation and implant groups did not improve when the single-talker masker was a different talker compared to the same talker as the target speech, as was found in the normal-hearing control. These results are interpreted as evidence for a significant role of informational masking and modulation interference in cochlear implant speech recognition with fluctuating maskers. This informational masking may originate from increased target-masker similarity when spectral resolution is reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple comparisons among means
Dunn, O. J. (1961) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 · Cited by 5,006
A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later
Greenwood, D. D. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.399052 · Cited by 1,890
Kawahara, H., Masuda-Katsuse, I., & de Cheveigné, A. (1999) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(98)00085-5 · Cited by 1,831
A METHOD FOR JUDGING ALL CONTRASTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE*
SCHEFFÉ, H. (1953) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/40.1-2.87 · Cited by 1,705
IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements
(1969) · IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics · doi:10.1109/tau.1969.1162058 · Cited by 1,232
Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers
Brungart, D. S. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1345696 · Cited by 1,139
Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., & Wang, X. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1381538 · Cited by 1,049
A Method for Judging all Contrasts in the Analysis of Variance
Scheffe, H. (1953) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333100 · Cited by 915
Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.400247 · Cited by 856
The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer
Hawley, M. L., Litovsky, R. Y., & Culling, J. F. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1639908 · Cited by 538
Self-citation
Cited by
Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation
Zeng, F.-G., Rebscher, S., Harrison, W., Sun, X., & Feng, H. (2008) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2008.2008250 · Cited by 878
Self-citationCombining acoustic and electrical hearing
Gantz, B. J., & Turner, C. W. (2003) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-200310000-00012 · Cited by 377
Bee, M. A., & Micheyl, C. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.235 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Stickney, G. S., Zeng, F.-G., Litovsky, R., & Assmann, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1081-1091
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2023233074
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1772399
- The paper
- Stickney, G. S., Zeng, F.-G., Litovsky, R., & Assmann, P. (2004). Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1772399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.