The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Open accessAbstract
Relationships between a listener's identification of a spoken vowel and its properties as revealed from acoustic measurement of its sound wave have been a subject of study by many investigators. Both the utterance and the identification of a vowel depend upon the language and dialectal backgrounds and the vocal and auditory characteristics of the individuals concerned. The purpose of this paper is to discuss some of the control methods that have been used in the evaluation of these effects in a vowel study program at Bell Telephone Laboratories. The plan of the study, calibration of recording and measuring equipment, and methods for checking the performance of both speakers and listeners are described. The methods are illustrated from results of tests involving some 76 speakers and 70 listeners.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Iii vowel stimuli covered the entire range of formant frequencies produced by typical male speakers (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as Peterson & Barney, 1952
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
SPEECH RECOGNITION IN DEAF SUBJECTS WITH MULTICHANNEL INTRACOCHLEAR ELECTRODESa
Eddington, D. K. (1983) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31637.x · Cited by 146
Agamaite, J. A., Chang, C.-J., Osmanski, M. S., & Wang, X. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4934268 · Cited by 148
“Download to IP: 162.129.251.85 On: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:53:02 formants of vowels) tend to be indicative of perceptual classification boundaries (Peterson and Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundInfluentialCallan, D. E., Kent, R. D., Guenther, F. H., & Vorperian, H. K. (2000) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4303.721 · Cited by 146
Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Fox, R. A. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.409931 · Cited by 144
Watt, D. J. L., & Fabricius, A. H. (2002) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 141
Bent, T., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.97 · Cited by 137
“The stimulus frequency range was between the average fundamental frequency ranges for adult male and female speakers (Peterson & Barney, 1952) and therefore within the fundamental frequency range covered by adult speakers.”
BackgroundTalker-specific perceptual adaptation during online speech perception
Trude, A. M., & Brown‐Schmidt, S. (2011) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.597153 · Cited by 138
“), and at the same time, a particular phoneme can be conveyed with different acoustic signals (Gordon, 1988 ; Liberman, Cooper, Shankweiler, & Studdert-Kennedy, 1967 ; Peterson & Barney, 1952 ).”
BackgroundSpeech Production Characteristics of the Hearing Impaired
Osberger, M. J., & McGarr, N. S. (1982) · Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608608-9.50013-9 · Cited by 139
“High vowels are produced on a higher Fo than low vowels, resulting in an inverse relationship between Fo and the frequency location of the first formant of the vowel (House & Fairbanks, 1953; Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundPeelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1315 · Cited by 138
Mutual information maximization: models of cortical self-organization
Becker, S. (1996) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/0954898x.1996.11978653 · Cited by 139
“We used the Peterson‐Barney data set consisting of the first two formants extracted from 10 vowels spoken by multiple male and female speakers [ 23 ].”
MethodVowel formant discrimination: Towards more ordinary listening conditions
Kewley-Port, D., & Zheng, Y. (1999) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.428134 · Cited by 138
Maximum Likelihood Competitive Learning
Nowlan, S. J. (1989) · Cited by 138
Human Vocal Attractiveness as Signaled by Body Size Projection
Xu, Y., Lee, A., Wu, W.-L., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062397 · Cited by 137
“Male vocal folds are longer than those of females, leading to a lower fundamental frequency [20].”
BackgroundPhillips, D. P., & Farmer, M. E. (1990) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(90)90001-u · Cited by 137
Linguistics in Pursuit of Justice
Baugh, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316597750 · Cited by 137
Auditory Gap Detection, Perceptual Channels, and Temporal Resolution in Speech Perception
Phillips, D. P. (1999) · Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1748505 · Cited by 133
Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: Evidence from a word reconstruction task
Ooijen, B. V. (1996) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201084 · Cited by 135
LIEBERMAN, P. H., Laitman, J. T., Reidenberg, J. S., & Gannon, P. J. (1992) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90046-c · Cited by 129
The motor theory of speech perception: A critical review.
Lane, H. L. (1965) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0021986 · Cited by 127
Auditory Cortical Detection and Discrimination Correlates with Communicative Significance
Liu, R. C., & Schreiner, C. E. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050173 · Cited by 130
“In the context of species-specific communication, this issue is complicated by the fact that many sounds with the same meaning are variable in their physical characteristics, such as speech phonemes spoken by different people [1,2].”
BackgroundResultWord-level information influences phonetic learning in adults and infants
Feldman, N. H., Myers, E. B., White, K. S., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.007 · Cited by 126
Linear correlates in the speech signal: The orderly output constraint
Sussman, H. M., Fruchter, D. E., Hilbert, J., & Sirosh, J. (1998) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x98001174 · Cited by 131
Rich memory and distributed phonology
Port, R. F. (2009) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2009.06.001 · Cited by 134
“…on linguistic variation (e.g., Labov, 1994; Bybee, 2001) along with generations of literature from experimental phonetics (e.g., Peterson and Barney, 1952; Lisker and Abramson, 1964, 1967; Local, 2003; Hawkins, 2003; Johnson, 2001, 2006; Hay and Drager, 2007) have shown that the variety of…”
BackgroundCorticofugal modulation of midbrain sound processing in the house mouse
Yan, J., & Ehret, G. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02046.x · Cited by 129
“It has clearly been shown in bats (Suga, 1988; Preisler & Schmidt, 1995), mice (Ehret & Haack, 1982; Ehret, 1992), and humans (Peterson & Barney, 1952; Flanagan, 1972) that the identi®cation and discrimination of multiharmonic sounds depend, in the frequency domain, on the relative intensity of…”
BackgroundSpeech Perception and Spoken Word Recognition: Past and Present
Jusczyk, P. W., & Luce, P. A. (2002) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-200202000-00002 · Cited by 132
“Peterson and Barney (1952) collected data on the production of different English vowels by 76 talkers.”
BackgroundMack, M. (1989) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03204982 · Cited by 128
On the nature of the foreign accent syndrome: A case study
Blumstein, S. E., ALEXANDER, M. P., Ryalls, J., Katz, W. F., & Dworetzky, B. A. (1987) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(87)90071-x · Cited by 126
Conversational role influences speech imitation
Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C., & Krauss, R. M. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03196699 · Cited by 133
“Vowels are likely candidates for convergence, due to their inherent productive and perceptual variability ( Peterson & Barney, 1952; Pisoni & Tash, 1974) and to their participation in dialectal and indexical variation (Labov, 1974, 1986).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialJansen, W. (2004) · Cited by 125
Skuk, V. G., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2013) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0314 · Cited by 131
Structure in talker variability: How much is there and how much can it help?
Kleinschmidt, D. (2018) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1500698 · Cited by 128
“…anatomy of the vocal tract (Fitch & Giedd, 1999; Johnson, 1993) and factors pertaining to a talker’s social-indexical group memberships, such as age (Lee, Potamianos, & Narayanan, 1999), gender (Perry, Ohde, & Ashmead, 2001; Peterson & Barney, 1952), and dialect (Labov, Ash, & Boberg, 2006).”
BackgroundUchanski, R. M., & Geers, A. E. (2003) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000051744.24290.c1 · Cited by 124
“…of 3105 Hz and 1355 Hz (8- and 9-yr-old talkers in Eguchi & Hirsh, 1969), 2776 Hz and 1067 Hz (11- to 14-yr-old talkers in Angelocci et al., 1964), 2414 Hz and 1146 Hz (12- to 16-yr-old talkers in Monsen, 1976b), and 3200 Hz and 1060 Hz (children of unknown ages in Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundLearning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.
Sheffert, S. M., Pisoni, D. B., Fellowes, J. M., & Remez, R. E. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1447 · Cited by 133
Contrast Tuning in Auditory Cortex
Barbour, D. L., & Wang, X. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080425 · Cited by 121
Baum, S. R., Blumstein, S. E., Naeser, M. A., et al. (1990) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(90)90003-y · Cited by 123
Effects of consonant context on the perception of French vowels
Gottfried, T. L. (1984) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30858-7 · Cited by 122
Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch
Henton, C. G. (1989) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/0271-5309(89)90026-8 · Cited by 122
Grossberg, S. (2017) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2016.11.003 · Cited by 120
On Maximum Depth and Related Classifiers
Ghosh, A. K., & Chaudhuri, P. (2005) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2005.00423.x · Cited by 121
“This data set was created by Peterson & Barney (1952) by a spectrographic analysis of vowels in words formed by ‘h’ followed by a vowel and then followed by ‘d’.”
MethodThe Foreign Accent Syndrome: A Reconsideration
Kurowski, K. M., Blumstein, S. E., & ALEXANDER, M. P. (1996) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0059 · Cited by 119
“from Peterson and Barney (1952).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAnalysis of English Nonsense Syllable Recognition in Noise
Benkı́, J. R. (2003) · Phonetica · doi:10.1159/000071450 · Cited by 120
“Hillenbrand, J.M.; Getty, L.A.; Clark, M.J.; Wheeler, K.: Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.”
BackgroundInfluentialStrange, W., Weber, A., Levy, E. S., et al. (2007) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2749716 · Cited by 120
Temporal-based acoustic-phonetic patterns in read speech: some evidence for speaker sex differences
Whiteside, S. P. (1996) · Journal of the International Phonetic Association · doi:10.1017/s0025100300005302 · Cited by 119
Dissecting neural computations in the human auditory pathway using deep neural networks for speech
Li, Y., Anumanchipalli, G. K., Mohamed, A., Chen, P., Carney, L. H., Lu, J., Wu, J., & Chang, E. F. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01468-4 · Cited by 126
Infants' Ability to Match Dynamic Phonetic and Gender Information in the Face and Voice
Patterson, M., & Werker, J. F. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.2001.2644 · Cited by 127
“In addition, vowels produced by a man, woman, or child are different in terms of formant frequency ( Peterson & Barney, 1952 ).”
BackgroundBoë, L.-J., Heim, J.-L., Honda, K., et al. (2007) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2007.06.006 · Cited by 117
Major and minor music compared to excited and subdued speech
Bowling, D. L., Gill, K. Z., Choi, J. D., Prinz, J., & Purves, D. (2010) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3268504 · Cited by 116
EARSHOT: A Minimal Neural Network Model of Incremental Human Speech Recognition
Magnuson, J. S., You, H., Luthra, S., Li, M. M. Q., Nam, H., Escabı́, M. A., Brown, K., Allopenna, P. D., Theodore, R. M., Monto, N. R., et al. (2020) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12823 · Cited by 117
Dynamics of Vowel Articulation
Alfonso, P. J., & Baer, T. (1982) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383098202500203 · Cited by 115
Lifting the curtain on the Wizard of Oz: Biased voice-based impressions of speaker size.
Rendall, D., Vokey, J. R., & Nemeth, C. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1208 · Cited by 116
Acoustic Characteristics of Normal and Pathological Voices
Davis, S. B. (1979) · Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608601-0.50010-3 · Cited by 115
Queen, R. M. (2012) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2012.0078 · Cited by 114
Aging Affects Neural Synchronization to Speech-Related Acoustic Modulations
Goossens, T., Vercammen, C., Wouters, J. M., & Wieringen, A. V. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00133 · Cited by 110
“We calculated the 4, 20, 40, and 80Hz neural SNR per hemisphere by means of log-transformation of the average SNR across the eight electrodes selected in the LH or RH (see Figure 2).”
BackgroundInfluentialTraining Japanese Listeners to Perceive American English Vowels: Influence of Training Sets
Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/103 · Cited by 116
Benders, T. (2013) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.09.001 · Cited by 112
“…do not necessarily result from an affective speaking style, but could also show that caregivers attempt to imitate their infant (Dodane & Al-Tamimi, 2007): Infants have a smaller vocal tract than adults and therefore they produce their vowels with overall higher formants (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundA parametric model of the vocal tract area function for vowel and consonant simulation
Story, B. H. (2005) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1869752 · Cited by 114
What the Voice Reveals: Within- and Between-Category Stereotyping on the Basis of Voice
Ko, S. J., Judd, C. M., & Blair, I. V. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206286627 · Cited by 113
“…(very) scale.3 ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC CHARACTERISTICS Our choice of acoustic characteristics was guided by results from established acoustical research (e.g., Byrd, 1994; Coleman, 1976; Graddol & Swann, 1983; Kramer, 1977; Peterson & Barney, 1952; Ray, 1986; Tusing & Dillard, 2000; Whiteside, 2001).”
BackgroundMethodExploiting deep neural networks for detection-based speech recognition
Siniscalchi, S. M., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Lee, C. (2012) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2012.11.008 · Cited by 111
“In [60], for example, the authors have found that there is a great overlap between formant frequencies for different vowel sounds by different talkers.”
BackgroundThe influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues
Parikh, G., & Loizou, P. C. (2005) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2118407 · Cited by 113
Improved cortical entrainment to infant communication calls in mothers compared with virgin mice
Liu, R. C., Linden, J. F., & Schreiner, C. E. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04840.x · Cited by 112
“Here, we explored whether one particular acoustic feature that defines these calls ) the repetition rate of calls within a bout ) is represented differently in the auditory cortex of these two animal groups.”
BackgroundXu, Y. (2010) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.04.003 · Cited by 112
“But in fact, this type of lab speech is already a big improvement over earlier recordings in which syllables or even vowels are recorded in isolation (e.g., Peterson & Barney, 1952), because the inclusion of a carrier allows the control of the effect of immediate phonetic context.”
BackgroundThe influence of Gujarati and Tamil L1s on Indian English: a preliminary study
Wiltshire, C. R., & Harnsberger, J. D. (2006) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00448.x · Cited by 112
Prosodic Development in Normal and Autistic Children
Baltaxe, C. A. M., & Simmons, J. Q. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4806-2_7 · Cited by 114
Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions
Simpson, A. P. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1356020 · Cited by 112
Preston, D. R. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118335598.ch7 · Cited by 115
“The first (#2 in table 2.3) is called “ultra-low” since it represented an onset considerably below the norm (for F1) for height of /a/ as given in Peterson and Barney (1952), an acoustic study of “General American” vowels The third token to which the sample was to be matched is called “actual,” and…”
BackgroundInfluentialA framework for the study of vocal registers
Titze, I. R. (1988) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(88)80075-4 · Cited by 111
Using Variability to Guide Dimensional Weighting: Associative Mechanisms in Early Word Learning
Apfelbaum, K. S., & McMurray, B. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01181.x · Cited by 113
“A cue like first formant frequency is a weak cue for voicing (Summerfield & Haggard, 1977), while it fairly robust cue to vowel height (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
Formant estimation for speech recognition
Welling, L., & Ney, H. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.650308 · Cited by 111
Speculations about the selective basis for modern human craniofacial form
Lieberman, D. E. (2008) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20154 · Cited by 109
Künzel, H. J. (2001) · International Journal of Speech Language and the Law · doi:10.1558/ijsll.v8i1.80 · Cited by 110
Loose Lips and Silver Tongues, or, Projecting Sexual Orientation Through Speech
Munson, B., & Babel, M. (2007) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00028.x · Cited by 110
Discrimination of speaker size from syllable phrases
Ives, D. T., Smith, D. R. R., & Patterson, R. D. (2005) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2118427 · Cited by 110
“Thus we find that Gonzalez (2004) found a weak relationship between formant frequency and height that was stronger for women than for men, whereas Rendall et al. (2005) found a weak relationship between formant frequency and height that was stronger for men than for women.”
Kingston, J. K. C. (2003) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309030460020201 · Cited by 108
“…many American English speakers now pronounce their own high back vowels /u, U / fairly far forward on the palate (de Jong, 1995; Hillenbrand et al., 1995; cf. Peterson & Barney, 1952) and thus with F2 values high enough to bring these vowels close to the German front rounded vowels / y, Y /.”
BackgroundKuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D. (1982) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202536 · Cited by 109
Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production
Perkell, J. S., Lane, H. L., Svirsky, M. A., et al. (1992) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.402932 · Cited by 108
Differences in the F0 Patterns of Speech: Tone Language Versus Stress Language
Eady, S. J. (1982) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383098202500103 · Cited by 108
Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory
Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1995) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205458 · Cited by 107
Effects of speaker gender on voice onset time in Korean stops
Oh, E. (2011) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.002 · Cited by 107
Gender Categorization Is Abnormal in Cochlear Implant Users
Fuller, C. D., Gaudrain, É., Clarke, J., Galvin, J. J., Fu, Q., Free, R. H., & Başkent, D. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-014-0483-7 · Cited by 104
ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF VOWEL PRODUCTION IN YOUNG CHILDREN
LIEBERMAN, P. H. (1980) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-770601-6.50012-7 · Cited by 105
The Interlingual Identification of Spanish and English Vowels: Orthographic Evidence
Flege, J. E. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749108400993 · Cited by 105
Acoustic Interpretation of the Voice Range Profile (Phonetogram)
Titze, I. R. (1992) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3501.21 · Cited by 105
Continuous Automatic Speech Recognition by Lipreading
Goldschen, A. J., Garcia, O. N., & Petajan, E. D. (1997) · Computational imaging and vision · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8935-2_14 · Cited by 110
“Recalling the vowel triangle from Peterson and Barney [42], the viseme group {/ax/,/ih/,/iy/} includes vowels associated with similar tongue height (high).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhonemes: Lexical access and beyond
Kazanina, N., Bowers, J. S., & Idsardi, W. J. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1362-0 · Cited by 118
“Prototypicality effects across acoustic realisations Even when the speaker, word, or context are fixed, segments have a range of admissible acoustic realisations, with some tokens being more frequent or prototypical than others (e.g. Lisker & Abramson, 1964; Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundAllen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (1999) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.427949 · Cited by 103
Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensional acoustic categories.
Goudbeek, M. B., Swingley, D., & Smits, R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0015781 · Cited by 101
“These dimensions are important in the perception of vowel sounds (e.g., Ainsworth, 1972; Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundEvaluating generalised additive mixed modelling strategies for dynamic speech analysis
Sóskuthy, M. (2021) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2020.101017 · Cited by 103
Neural Bases of Talker Normalization
Wong, P. C. M., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929041920522 · Cited by 103
“For example, in the classic study by Peterson and Barney (1952) , recordings of American English vowels produced by adult men, adult women, and children yielded considerable overlap between the categories /I/ (as in ‘‘bit’’) and /a/ (as in ‘‘bet’’) in a space whose axes corresponded to the first and second resonance f…”
BackgroundDiscrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users
Gaudrain, É., & Başkent, D. (2017) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000480 · Cited by 100
“Estimates in the literature vary from 13% (Fitch & Giedd 1999) or 15% (Fant 1970) to about 18% (Turner et al. 2009, based on the data of Peterson & Barney 1952).”
BackgroundChanging the vocal characteristics of a postoperative transsexual patient: A longitudinal study
Mount, K. H., & Salmon, S. J. (1988) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/0021-9924(88)90031-7 · Cited by 102
Role of experience for language-specific functional mappings of vowel sounds
Kluender, K. R., Lotto, A. J., Holt, L. L., & Bloedel, S. L. (1998) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.423939 · Cited by 106
Masataka, N. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489754 · Cited by 106
The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context
Reinisch, E., & Sjerps, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.002 · Cited by 100
“However, in order to properly evaluate these cues, listeners have to deal with a large amount of variation (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundLehman, J. J., Bless, D. M., & Brandenburg, J. H. (1988) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/019459988809800205 · Cited by 102
Perception and production of French close and close-mid rounded vowels by Japanese-speaking learners
Kamiyama, T., & Vaissière, J. (2009) · Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère · doi:10.4000/aile.4533 · Cited by 103
“Hillenbrand et al. compared their fi ndings with the data of Peterson and Barney (1952), showing that the average values of the fi rst two formants of /u/ pronounced in /hVd/ context were higher in their data both for male and female speakers.”
Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., & Nishi, K. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1353594 · Cited by 101
Vowel Quality in Hongyan Qiang
Evans, J. P. (2006) · Language and Linguistics 語言暨語言學 · Cited by 101
Speaking Fundamental Frequency and Vowel Formant Frequencies: Effects on Perception of Gender
Gelfer, M. P., & Bennett, Q. E. (2013) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.11.008 · Cited by 101
“In the case of the vowel formant frequencies of male and female speakers, our results were similar to those of Hillenbrand et al,(20) and to a lesser degree, Peterson and Barney.(19) This is not surprising, given that the technology used in the present study was more comparable to that used by Hillenbrand et al(20) th…”
ResultIdentification of vowels in “vowelless” syllables
Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., & Edman, T. R. (1983) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203059 · Cited by 100
Assessing transcription agreement: Methodological aspects
Catia Cucchiarini, A. (1996) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699209608985167 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L.
- Affiliations
- Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., Murray Hill, New Jersey
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1952-03-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2056133372
- Cited by
- 2,837
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 118
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- vowel recognition, listener identification, equipment calibration, auditory characteristics, speech perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
