The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Open accessAbstract
Relationships between a listener's identification of a spoken vowel and its properties as revealed from acoustic measurement of its sound wave have been a subject of study by many investigators. Both the utterance and the identification of a vowel depend upon the language and dialectal backgrounds and the vocal and auditory characteristics of the individuals concerned. The purpose of this paper is to discuss some of the control methods that have been used in the evaluation of these effects in a vowel study program at Bell Telephone Laboratories. The plan of the study, calibration of recording and measuring equipment, and methods for checking the performance of both speakers and listeners are described. The methods are illustrated from results of tests involving some 76 speakers and 70 listeners.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Iii vowel stimuli covered the entire range of formant frequencies produced by typical male speakers (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as Peterson & Barney, 1952
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Vowels formants analysis allows straightforward detection of high arousal emotions
Vlasenko, B., Philippou-Hübner, D., Prylipko, D., Böck, R., Siegert, I., & Wendemuth, A. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) · doi:10.1109/icme.2011.6012003 · Cited by 34
“In 1952, Paterson and Barney [14] created a classic plot of measured values of the first and second formant for 10 English vowels spoken by a wide range of male and female talkers.”
BackgroundThe role of prosody in a case of foreign accent syndrome (FAS)
Katz, W. F., Garst, D. M., & Levitt, J. S. (2008) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699200802106284 · Cited by 33
“Thus, the formant frequencies listed by Peterson and Barney (1952) are not necessarily representative of American talkers today (see Clopper, Pisoni, & de Jong, 2005, for discussion).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReference data for the American English acoustic vowel space
Flipsen, P., & Lee, S. (2012) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2012.720634 · Cited by 32
“Such an approach has yielded findings of a general pattern of decreasing formant frequencies with age as well lower formant frequencies for males versus females (e.g. Hillenbrand, Getty, Clark, & Wheeler, 1995; Lee, Potamianos, & Narayanan, 1999; Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAcoustic cues to identity and predator context in meerkat barks
Townsend, S. W., Charlton, B. D., & Manser, M. B. (2014) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.021 · Cited by 32
Choral Reading with Filtered Speech: Effect on Stuttering
Rami, M. K., Kalinowski, J. S., Rastatter, M. P., Holbert, D., & Allen, M. (2005) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.100.2.421-431 · Cited by 31
“These signals were resampled at 44100 Hz, 16 bits, normalized using a sound-editing software ( The vowels with the lowest first, second, and third formants are known to be /i/, /3/, and /u/, respectively (Peterson & Barney, 1954).”
MethodTalker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization
Assgari, A. A., & Stilp, C. E. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4934559 · Cited by 32
The Voice Source in Speech Production: Data, Analysis and Models
Ángeles, L. (2010) · Cited by 32
The Perception of Family and Register in Musical Tones
Patterson, R. D., Gaudrain, É., & Walters, T. C. (2010) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6114-3_2 · Cited by 32
“In speech, the pattern of formants that defines a given vowel type remains largely unchanged as people grow up (Peterson and Barney 1952; Lee et al. 1999; Turner et al. 2009).”
BackgroundBion, R. A. H., Escudero, P., Rauber, A. S., et al. (2006) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2006-411 · Cited by 32
Dimension‐Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production
Lehet, M., & Holt, L. L. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12413 · Cited by 28
“F0 varies substantially across gender (e.g., Peterson & Barney, 1952), so we also analyzed F0 as a function of voiced and voiceless consonants separately for male and female participants.”
BackgroundXie, X., & Myers, E. B. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01208 · Cited by 31
“Vowels may be especially vulnerable to confusion in English, given that English has a dense vowel space, with vowel categories that overlap acoustically (Hillenbrand, Getty, Clark, & Wheeler, 1995; Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
Vowel quality in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Phonetic transcription and formant analyses
Haley, K. L., Ohde, R. N., & Wertz, R. T. (2001) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687040143000519 · Cited by 32
“A similar difference between these target vowels has been reported in previous studies of normal speech production (Assman & Katz, 2000; Hillenbrand et al., 1995; Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEvans, B. (2004) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394504162042 · Cited by 32
“Figure 1 shows such a system, based in part on Peterson and Barney (1952).”
BackgroundStimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech
Rosenbaum, D. Α., Gordon, A. M., Stillings, N. A., et al. (1987) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197719 · Cited by 32
Adaptive Regularization in Neural Network Modeling
Larsen, J. O., Svarer, C., Andersen, L. N., & Hansen, L. K. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49430-8_6 · Cited by 32
“The data are based on the Peterson and Barney database [35].”
MethodAdults’ perception of native and nonnative vowels: Implications for the perceptual magnet effect
Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., Flege, J. E., & Sloane, M. E. (1999) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211973 · Cited by 35
“…1991; Kuhl et aI., 1992; Sussman & Lauckner-Morano, 1995), even though speakers of the same language and even the same dialect can differ substantialIy in their vowel productions (see Hillenbrand, Getty, Clark, & Wheeler, 1995; Joos, 1948; Labov, 1991; Labov & Ash, 1997; Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundMethodPhoneme Recognition and Confusions With Multichannel Cochlear Implants
Välimaa, T., Määttä, T. K., Löppönen, H., et al. (2002) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/084 · Cited by 32
THE VOWEL PHONOLOGY OF URBAN SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN
Purnell, T. C. (2009) · Publication of the American Dialect Society · doi:10.1215/-94-1-191 · Cited by 31
Li, F., Drew Rendall, A., Vasey, P. L., Kinsman, M., Ward-Sutherland, A., & Diano, G. (2016) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.004 · Cited by 31
“These differences were originally attributed to anatomical/physical differences in vocal apparatus between the two sexes as women have shorter vocal tracts and larynxes than men (Fitch & Giedd, 1999; Peterson & Barney, 1952; Rendall, Kollias, Ney, & Lloyd, 2005; Titze, 1994).”
Optimal features for auditory categorization
Liu, S. T., Montes-Lourido, P., Wang, X., & Sadagopan, S. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09115-y · Cited by 30
“Mechanistically, neural selectivity for MIFs may be generated (1) gradually along the ascending auditory pathway, or (2) de Marmoset A1”
InfluentialGrawunder, S., Uomini, N., Samuni, L., Bortolato, T., Girard‐Buttoz, C., Wittig, R. M., & Crockford, C. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0455 · Cited by 29
“Mapping of the chimpanzee formant measures onto the human F1 – F2 space used for vowels in American English in female speakers [40] revealed that chimpanzees cover two of the three extremes or ‘ apexes ’ of the human vowel space, [u,a], but do not reach the third apex [i].”
BackgroundResultSpeaker verification based on the fusion of speech acoustics and inverted articulatory signals
Li, M., Kim, J., Lammert, A. C., et al. (2015) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2015.05.003 · Cited by 31
Theodore, R. M., Blumstein, S. E., & Luthra, S. (2015) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0854-0 · Cited by 31
Visual face-movement sensitive cortex is relevant for auditory-only speech recognition
Riedel, P., Ragert, P., Schelinski, S., Kiebel, S. J., & von Kriegstein, K. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.016 · Cited by 30
Talker variability in audio-visual speech perception
Heald, S. L. M., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00698 · Cited by 30
“For different talkers, a given acoustic pattern may correspond to different phonemes, while conversely, a given phoneme may be represented by different acoustic patterns across different talkers (Peterson and Barney, 1952; Liberman et al., 1967; Dorman et al., 1977).”
BackgroundThe acoustics of normal and nasal vowel production.
Schwartz, M. F. (1968) · PubMed · Cited by 31
Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains
Litvak, L. M., Delgutte, B., & Eddington, D. K. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1612494 · Cited by 31
Effects of transitory lingual nerve impairment on speech: An acoustic study of vowel sounds
Niemi, M., Laaksonen, J., Vähätalo, K., Tuomainen, J., Aaltonen, O., & Happonen, R. (2002) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1053/joms.2002.33113 · Cited by 31
Unsupervised Discrimination of Clustered Data via Optimization of Binary Information Gain
Schraudolph, N. N., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1992) · Cited by 31
The Neural Code of Pitch and Harmony
Langner, G. D. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139050852 · Cited by 31
Bizley, J. K., Walker, K. M. M., King, A. J., & Schnupp, J. W. H. (2013) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4768798 · Cited by 30
“When plotted in F1–F2 space they occupy opposite poles (Peterson and Barney, 1952).”
Bouchard, K. E., Conant, D. F., Anumanchipalli, G. K., Dichter, B., Chaisanguanthum, K. S., Johnson, K. A., & Chang, E. F. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151327 · Cited by 30
“For the acoustic features, F1 through F4 all exhibit considerable separation between vowels during steady state production, and the relative magnitudes between vowels are consistent with previous literature on vowel acoustics [2,24,26].”
ResultMapping the cortical representation of speech sounds in a syllable repetition task
Markiewicz, C. J., & Bohland, J. W. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.023 · Cited by 35
“Vowels, for instance, form clusters in the F1, F2 formant frequency space [96]; a handful of voxels whose responses correlate with formants, then, could drive above-chance vowel classification.”
Song and infant-directed speech facilitate word learning
Ma, W., Fiveash, A., Margulis, E. H., Behrend, D. A., & Thompson, W. F. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819888982 · Cited by 30
“IDS production has been described as mimicking a shorter vocal tract (Kent, 1976, 1992) that may result in enhanced formant frequencies (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundThe influence of regard on language variation and change
Preston, D. R. (2013) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.015 · Cited by 30
Vowel formant dispersion as a measure of articulation proficiency
Karlsson, F., & van Doorn, J. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4746025 · Cited by 30
Hagiwara, R. (2006) · The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique · doi:10.1353/cjl.2008.0022 · Cited by 30
Using Visual Information to Train Foreign‐Language Vowel Production*
Flege, J. E. (1988) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00417.x · Cited by 30
THE SOUND OF ONE ARM SWINGING: A MODEL FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL AUDITORY DISPLAY OF PHYSICAL MOTION
Kleiman‐Weiner, M., & Berger, J. (2006) · Cited by 30
Akimov, А. G., Egorova, M. A., & Ehret, G. (2016) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13488 · Cited by 30
“…(Tembrock, 1996; Brudzynski, 2010) and human non-verbal vocalizations (Scherer, 1982; Zeskind, 2013) are spectrally complex often consisting of several harmonics of which some are amplified by the vocal tract as are formants of vowels in human speech (Peterson & Barney, 1952; Flanagan, 1972).”
BackgroundEvaluation of formant-like features on an automatic vowel classification task
de Wet, F., Weber, K., Boves, L., Cranen, B., Samy Bengio, A., & Bourlard, H. A. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1781620 · Cited by 30
How a Full Account of Segmental Perception Depends on Prosody and Vice Versa
Summerfield, Q. A. (1975) · Communication and cybernetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81000-8_4 · Cited by 30
Female voices in speech synthesis
Karlsson, I. (1991) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30306-7 · Cited by 30
The Role of Dialect Experience in Topic-Based Shifts in Speech Production
Walker, A. (2019) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394519000152 · Cited by 14
“Of course, using F2 is complicated by the fact that men on average have lower F2 than women (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundThe influence of inhibitory skill on phonological representations in production and perception☆
Lev‐Ari, S., & Peperkamp, S. (2014) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2014.09.001 · Cited by 29
Haider, C. L., Suess, N., Hauswald, A., Park, H., & Weisz, N. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119044 · Cited by 30
Experimental investigations of sociolinguistic knowledge
Casasanto, L. S. (2009) · Cited by 28
The periodic structure of vowel sounds is reflected in human electromagnetic brain responses
Alku, P., Sivonen, P., Palomäki, K. J., et al. (2001) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01708-0 · Cited by 29
Mathias, D., Thode, A. M., Straley, J. M., et al. (2009) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3097758 · Cited by 29
Unbalanced Decision Trees for multi-class classification
Ramanan, A., Suppharangsan, S., & Niranjan, M. (2007) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS) · doi:10.1109/iciinfs.2007.4579190 · Cited by 30
The role of voice source measures on automatic gender classification
Shue, Y.-L., & Iseli, M. R. (2008) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518654 · Cited by 29
“F0 for adult males is typically around 120 Hz, while F0 for adult females is around 200 Hz [2].”
BackgroundThe effects of inventory on vowel perception in French and Spanish: An MEG study
Hacquard, V., Walter, M. A., & Marantz, A. P. (2006) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.009 · Cited by 30
Bizley, J. K., & Walker, K. M. M. (2010) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858410371009 · Cited by 29
Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory
Lim, S.-J., Shinn‐Cunningham, B. G., & Perrachione, T. K. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01684-w · Cited by 30
Formant Characteristics of Vowels Produced by Mandarin Esophageal Speakers
Liu, H., & Ng, M. L. (2007) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.09.002 · Cited by 29
Tallal, P. A., Stark, R. E., Kallman, C. H., & Mellits, D. (1980) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400000722 · Cited by 29
Advancements of phonetics in the 21st century: Theoretical issues in sociophonetics
Kendall, T. S., Pharao, N., Stuart‐Smith, J., & Vaughn, C. R. (2023) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101226 · Cited by 30
Intelligibility and listener preference of telephone speech in the presence of babble noise
Hall, J. L., & Flanagan, J. L. (2010) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3263603 · Cited by 28
Gender difference in speech intelligibility using speech intelligibility tests and acoustic analyses
Kwon, H. (2010) · The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics · doi:10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.71 · Cited by 28
“In addition, vowel formant frequency values have been widely used in the study of speech to assess speech intellibility.(16)”
BackgroundMethodCorner vowels in males and females ages 4 to 20 years: Fundamental and F1–F4 formant frequencies
Vorperian, H. K., Kent, R. D., Lee, Y., et al. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5131271 · Cited by 28
Barkana, B. D., & Patel, A. (2020) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107203 · Cited by 28
Lehet, M. I., & Holt, L. L. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104328 · Cited by 24
Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure
Luthra, S., Mechtenberg, H., & Myers, E. B. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02261-w · Cited by 26
Learning of auditory equivalence classes for vowels by rats
Eriksson, J. L., & Villa, A. E. P. (2006) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.005 · Cited by 28
Compensation for vocal tract characteristics across native and non-native languages
Sjerps, M. J., & Smiljanić, R. (2013) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.005 · Cited by 28
Gilboa‐Schechtman, E., Galili, L., Sahar, Y., & Amir, O. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00147 · Cited by 30
Spectral modulation masking patterns reveal tuning to spectral envelope frequency
Saoji, A. A., & Eddins, D. A. (2007) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2751267 · Cited by 28
Tillery, K. H., Brown, C. A., & Bacon, S. P. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3664101 · Cited by 28
“Given the filtering parameters used to simulate residual lowfrequency hearing in the present study, it is possible that the first formants of some vowels were at times audible (Peterson and Barney, 1952; Hillenbrand et al., 1995).”
BackgroundEffects of Talker Variability on Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implants
Chang, Y.-P., & Fu, Q. (2006) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/095 · Cited by 28
Explaining the Structure of Feature and Phoneme Inventories: The Role of Auditory Distinctiveness
Diehl, R. L., & Lindblom, B. E. F. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-21575-1_3 · Cited by 27
The Vowels of Stressed and Unstressed Syllables in Nonnative English*
Fokes, J., & Bond, Z. S. (1989) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00596.x · Cited by 28
Relationship between fundamental and formant frequencies in voice preference
Assmann, P. F., & Nearey, T. M. (2007) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2719045 · Cited by 28
Sinnott, J. M., Street, S. L., Mosteller, K. W., et al. (1997) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00125-1 · Cited by 28
Adaptive regularization of neural classifiers
Andersen, L. N., Larsen, J. O., Hansen, L. K., et al. (2002) · doi:10.1109/nnsp.1997.622380 · Cited by 28
A Dynamic Neural Network Architecture by Sequential Partitioning of the Input Space
Shadafan, R. S., & Niranjan, M. (1994) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1994.6.6.1202 · Cited by 28
Some preliminary experiments in the recognition of connected digits
Rabiner, L. R., & Sambur, M. R. (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1976.1162794 · Cited by 28
“Based upon the Peterson and Barney [ 11 ] data, this criterion should be easily realized for this particular vowel.”
BackgroundThe acquisition of L3 English vowels by infant German–Italian bilinguals
Missaglia, F. (2009) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790710902972289 · Cited by 30
“Due to controlled experimental conditions, adequate measurement techniques and diachronic change they were considered more relevant for the scope of the present study than Peterson and Barney's ( 1952 ) data, which were obtained more than 50 years ago with 15 native and non-native children of the middle Atlantic speec…”
MethodLateral reflections are favorable in concert halls due to binaural loudness
Lokki, T., & Pätynen, J. (2011) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3647866 · Cited by 27
Age-Related Changes in Temporal and Spectral Cue Weights in Speech
Toscano, J. C., & Lansing, C. R. (2017) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830917737112 · Cited by 28
Sjerps, M. J., Zhang, C., & Peng, G. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000504 · Cited by 27
The Role of the Right Hemisphere in Processing Phonetic Variability Between Talkers
Luthra, S. (2020) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00028 · Cited by 26
A dual mechanism for intrinsic f0
Chen, W., Whalen, D. H., & Tiede, M. (2021) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101063 · Cited by 27
Cross-Modal Correspondences in Non-human Mammal Communication
Ratcliffe, V. F., Taylor, A. M., & Reby, D. (2015) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-00002509 · Cited by 27
“More specifically, within the same species, age-related differences in vocal fold growth mean that the F0 usually negatively correlates with body size across age categories in mammals (Hillenbrand et al., 1995; Peterson and Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundMeltzner, G. S., Kobler, J. B., & Hillman, R. E. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1582440 · Cited by 27
The effect of filtered speech on speaker height and weight identification
Lass, N. J., Phillips, J. K., & Bruchey, C. A. (1980) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31453-6 · Cited by 27
Perception and Acoustic Studies of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech
Ishikawa, K., Nudelman, C. J., Park, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.022 · Cited by 27
Inspiratory pressure threshold training for glottal airway limitation in laryngeal papilloma
Sapienza, C. M., Brown, J., Martin, D., & Davenport, P. W. (1999) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80043-5 · Cited by 27
Morris, R. J. (1997) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0021-9924(96)00057-3 · Cited by 27
Surface form typicality and asymmetric transfer in episodic memory for spoken words.
Nygaard, L. C., Burt, S. A., & Queen, J. S. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1228 · Cited by 35
Speech perception based on spectral peaks versus spectral shape
Hillenbrand, J. M., Houde, R. A., & Gayvert, R. T. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2188369 · Cited by 27
Improving the Consistency of Formant Measurement
Duckworth, M., McDougall, K., de Jong, G., & Shockey, L. (2011) · International Journal of Speech Language and the Law · doi:10.1558/ijsll.v18i1.35 · Cited by 28
Children’s perception of speaker sex
Bennett, S., & Montero-Diaz, L. (1982) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30908-8 · Cited by 27
Experiments with computer-controlled displays in second-language learning
Kalikow, D. N., & Swets, J. A. (1972) · IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics · doi:10.1109/tau.1972.1162353 · Cited by 27
“It is well known from early work in acoustic phonetics [ 3 ] that the first two formant frequencies are highly correlated with tongue-body position (high-low and back-front, respectively).”
BackgroundA Perceptual Study of American English Diphthongs
Gay, T. (1970) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383097001300201 · Cited by 27
Speaker normalization and adaptation using second-order connectionist networks
Watrous, R. L. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.182692 · Cited by 27
Phonetic training for learners of Arabic
Burnham, K. R. (2013) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 29
A cross-linguistic study of Taiwanese tone perception by Taiwanese and English listeners
Sun, K.-C., & Huang, T. (2012) · Journal of East Asian Linguistics · doi:10.1007/s10831-012-9092-9 · Cited by 25
Increasing diversity of neural responses to speech sounds across the central auditory pathway
Ranasinghe, K. G., Vrana, W. A., Matney, C. J., & Kilgard, M. P. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.08.005 · Cited by 26
“Unique combinations of the first two formant frequencies (F1 & F2) and their trajectories can be used to define many of the English vowels (Peterson & Barney, 1952).”
BackgroundVoices of Africa: acoustic predictors of human male vocal attractiveness
Šebesta, P., Kleisner, K., Tureček, P., Kočnar, T., Akoko, R. M., Třebický, V., & Havlı́ček, J. (2017) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.03.014 · Cited by 26
The baboon: A model for the study of language evolution
Fagot, J., Boë, L.-J., Berthomier, F., Claidière, N., Malassis, R., Meguerditchian, A., Rey, A., & Montant, M. (2018) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.006 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L.
- Affiliations
- Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., Murray Hill, New Jersey
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1952-03-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2056133372
- Cited by
- 2,837
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 118
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- vowel recognition, listener identification, equipment calibration, auditory characteristics, speech perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review